心理:基于异质性信息网络的心理偏好评估

IF 8.1 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
IEEE Transactions on Big Data Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-13 DOI:10.1109/TBDATA.2026.3653641
Qingren Wang;Xu Wen;Juan Hou;Hong Zhong;Yiwen Zhang
{"title":"心理:基于异质性信息网络的心理偏好评估","authors":"Qingren Wang;Xu Wen;Juan Hou;Hong Zhong;Yiwen Zhang","doi":"10.1109/TBDATA.2026.3653641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In psychometry, psychometric profiles of an individual subject as well as correlations among the psychometric profiles are crucial supports for assessing the psychometric preference of the individual subject. Intuitively, while sufficient psychometric profiles in terms of amount and types yield high assessment accuracy, too many psychometric profiles increase workloads of subjects, because measuring a psychometric profile of an individual subject requires filling out one psychological questionnaire at least. The trade-off between assessment accuracy and participant burden constitutes a core challenge in psychometric research, because it directly affects both the statistical validity of findings and the cognitive feasibility of large-scale evaluation. Existing assessment frameworks often struggle to reconcile efficiency with precision. This challenge underscores the need for a new modeling paradigm capable of reducing measurement redundancy while preserving interpretability and reliability. Therefore, inspired by the semantic field, this paper defines a new concept, namely <i>profile field</i>, and proposes a novel framework, i.e., <i>PsycHin</i>, to achieve the trade-off. Specifically, <i>PsycHin</i> can be decomposed into three phases: <inline-formula><tex-math>$i$</tex-math></inline-formula>) modeling the psychologically cognitive processes, where <i>PsycHin</i> learns multiple explicit and implicit correlations among psychometric profiles based on a heterogeneous information network and defines a profile meta structure to guide instance extraction; <inline-formula><tex-math>$ii$</tex-math></inline-formula>) fitting data and calculating similarities among subjects, where <i>PsycHin</i> utilizes <i>tanh</i> to make up for the rating biases caused by the discrete scores from options of psychological questionnaires and employs entropy to measure the cognitive levels of subjects on same objects; and <inline-formula><tex-math>$iii$</tex-math></inline-formula>) constructing profile fields, where <i>PsycHin</i> calculates the importance of psychometric profiles and filters the noisy ones by leveraging the contribution rates of psychometric profiles. Our experimental results not only show that <i>PsycHin</i> performs well, but also demonstrate that incorporating the heterogeneous information network into psychometric preference assessment does improve the performance of <i>PsycHin</i>.","PeriodicalId":13106,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Big Data","volume":"12 3","pages":"962-976"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PsycHin: Finding the Trade-Off With Heterogeneous Information Network Toward Psychometric Preference Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Qingren Wang;Xu Wen;Juan Hou;Hong Zhong;Yiwen Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TBDATA.2026.3653641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In psychometry, psychometric profiles of an individual subject as well as correlations among the psychometric profiles are crucial supports for assessing the psychometric preference of the individual subject. Intuitively, while sufficient psychometric profiles in terms of amount and types yield high assessment accuracy, too many psychometric profiles increase workloads of subjects, because measuring a psychometric profile of an individual subject requires filling out one psychological questionnaire at least. The trade-off between assessment accuracy and participant burden constitutes a core challenge in psychometric research, because it directly affects both the statistical validity of findings and the cognitive feasibility of large-scale evaluation. Existing assessment frameworks often struggle to reconcile efficiency with precision. This challenge underscores the need for a new modeling paradigm capable of reducing measurement redundancy while preserving interpretability and reliability. Therefore, inspired by the semantic field, this paper defines a new concept, namely <i>profile field</i>, and proposes a novel framework, i.e., <i>PsycHin</i>, to achieve the trade-off. Specifically, <i>PsycHin</i> can be decomposed into three phases: <inline-formula><tex-math>$i$</tex-math></inline-formula>) modeling the psychologically cognitive processes, where <i>PsycHin</i> learns multiple explicit and implicit correlations among psychometric profiles based on a heterogeneous information network and defines a profile meta structure to guide instance extraction; <inline-formula><tex-math>$ii$</tex-math></inline-formula>) fitting data and calculating similarities among subjects, where <i>PsycHin</i> utilizes <i>tanh</i> to make up for the rating biases caused by the discrete scores from options of psychological questionnaires and employs entropy to measure the cognitive levels of subjects on same objects; and <inline-formula><tex-math>$iii$</tex-math></inline-formula>) constructing profile fields, where <i>PsycHin</i> calculates the importance of psychometric profiles and filters the noisy ones by leveraging the contribution rates of psychometric profiles. Our experimental results not only show that <i>PsycHin</i> performs well, but also demonstrate that incorporating the heterogeneous information network into psychometric preference assessment does improve the performance of <i>PsycHin</i>.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Big Data\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"962-976\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Big Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11347540/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Big Data","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11347540/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在心理测量学中,个体被测者的心理测量特征以及心理测量特征之间的相关性是评估个体被测者心理测量偏好的重要依据。从直观上看,虽然在数量和类型上足够的心理测量资料可以提高评估的准确性,但过多的心理测量资料会增加受试者的工作量,因为测量单个受试者的心理测量资料至少需要填写一份心理问卷。评估准确性和参与者负担之间的权衡是心理测量学研究的核心挑战,因为它直接影响到调查结果的统计效度和大规模评估的认知可行性。现有的评估框架常常难以协调效率和准确性。这一挑战强调需要一种新的建模范式,能够在保持可解释性和可靠性的同时减少测量冗余。因此,受语义场的启发,本文定义了一个新的概念,即profile field,并提出了一个新的框架,即PsycHin来实现这种权衡。具体来说,PsycHin可以分为三个阶段:$i$)心理认知过程建模,其中心理测量模型基于异构信息网络学习心理测量模型之间的多种显式和隐式关联,并定义一个模型元结构来指导实例提取;$ii$)拟合数据并计算受试者之间的相似性,其中PsycHin利用tanh来弥补心理问卷选项离散得分造成的评分偏差,并利用熵来衡量受试者对同一对象的认知水平;和$iii$)构造剖面字段,其中PsycHin计算心理测量剖面的重要性,并通过利用心理测量剖面的贡献率过滤噪声。我们的实验结果不仅表明了PsycHin的良好表现,而且表明将异构信息网络纳入心理偏好评估确实提高了PsycHin的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PsycHin: Finding the Trade-Off With Heterogeneous Information Network Toward Psychometric Preference Assessment
In psychometry, psychometric profiles of an individual subject as well as correlations among the psychometric profiles are crucial supports for assessing the psychometric preference of the individual subject. Intuitively, while sufficient psychometric profiles in terms of amount and types yield high assessment accuracy, too many psychometric profiles increase workloads of subjects, because measuring a psychometric profile of an individual subject requires filling out one psychological questionnaire at least. The trade-off between assessment accuracy and participant burden constitutes a core challenge in psychometric research, because it directly affects both the statistical validity of findings and the cognitive feasibility of large-scale evaluation. Existing assessment frameworks often struggle to reconcile efficiency with precision. This challenge underscores the need for a new modeling paradigm capable of reducing measurement redundancy while preserving interpretability and reliability. Therefore, inspired by the semantic field, this paper defines a new concept, namely profile field, and proposes a novel framework, i.e., PsycHin, to achieve the trade-off. Specifically, PsycHin can be decomposed into three phases: $i$) modeling the psychologically cognitive processes, where PsycHin learns multiple explicit and implicit correlations among psychometric profiles based on a heterogeneous information network and defines a profile meta structure to guide instance extraction; $ii$) fitting data and calculating similarities among subjects, where PsycHin utilizes tanh to make up for the rating biases caused by the discrete scores from options of psychological questionnaires and employs entropy to measure the cognitive levels of subjects on same objects; and $iii$) constructing profile fields, where PsycHin calculates the importance of psychometric profiles and filters the noisy ones by leveraging the contribution rates of psychometric profiles. Our experimental results not only show that PsycHin performs well, but also demonstrate that incorporating the heterogeneous information network into psychometric preference assessment does improve the performance of PsycHin.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Big Data publishes peer-reviewed articles focusing on big data. These articles present innovative research ideas and application results across disciplines, including novel theories, algorithms, and applications. Research areas cover a wide range, such as big data analytics, visualization, curation, management, semantics, infrastructure, standards, performance analysis, intelligence extraction, scientific discovery, security, privacy, and legal issues specific to big data. The journal also prioritizes applications of big data in fields generating massive datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书