药物包被球囊血管成形术治疗大血管新生冠状动脉病变的中期结果:大血管与小血管的比较

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy Pub Date : 2026-06-18 Epub Date: 2026-04-23 DOI:10.21037/cdt-2025-1-634
Wenjie Wang, Zhonghua Sun, Yong Zeng, Xianpeng Yu
{"title":"药物包被球囊血管成形术治疗大血管新生冠状动脉病变的中期结果:大血管与小血管的比较","authors":"Wenjie Wang, Zhonghua Sun, Yong Zeng, Xianpeng Yu","doi":"10.21037/cdt-2025-1-634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although a number of studies involving small-vessel <i>de novo</i> coronary disease have indicated that drug-coated balloons (DCBs) angioplasty, provides clinical benefits, the clinical value of DCB in large-vessel lesions remains unclear. We therefore conducted a real-world study to evaluate the midterm clinical outcomes of DCB treatment in patients with <i>de novo</i> coronary lesions >3.0 mm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of 1,514 consecutive patients who received paclitaxel DCB angioplasty to treat <i>de novo</i> coronary lesions at Beijing Anzhen Hospital between June 2019 and November 2021. Lesions with a reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥3.0 mm were defined as large-vessel disease (LVD), and lesions with an RVD ≤2.75 mm were defined as small-vessel disease (SVD). The LVD and SVD groups included 462 and 1,052 patients, respectively. The end points of the study were all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Outcomes were compared between the LVD and SVD groups. The median follow-up was 34.2 months [interquartile range (IQR), 31.3 to 39.7 months] in the overall cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,514 patients, 43 (2.8%) died, 21 (1.4%) experienced MI, and 21 (1.4%) experienced stroke; 167 (11.0%) underwent TVR. No significant differences were observed in mortality rate (LVD: 2.4%; SVD: 3.0%; P=0.32), MI (LVD: 1.1%; SVD: 1.5%; P=0.37), stroke (LVD: 0.9%; SVD: 1.6%, P=0.19) and TVR (LVD: 11.9%; SVD: 10.6%, P=0.92). After multivariate adjustment, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for LVD versus SVD were 1.092 (0.447-2.670; P=0.85) for death, 1.424 (0.464-4.369; P=0.54) for MI, 1.604 (0.529-4.864; P=0.40) for stroke, and 0.995 (0.719-1.378; P=0.98) for TVR, with no significant differences observed in any endpoints between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings from this study indicate that the prognosis of DCB for patients with <i>de novo</i> lesions in vessels exceeding 3.0 mm are not significantly different compared to those of DCB for patients with SVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9592,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy","volume":"16 3","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13345803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mid-term outcomes of using drug-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of large vessel <i>de novo</i> coronary lesions: comparison of large and small vessels.\",\"authors\":\"Wenjie Wang, Zhonghua Sun, Yong Zeng, Xianpeng Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/cdt-2025-1-634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although a number of studies involving small-vessel <i>de novo</i> coronary disease have indicated that drug-coated balloons (DCBs) angioplasty, provides clinical benefits, the clinical value of DCB in large-vessel lesions remains unclear. We therefore conducted a real-world study to evaluate the midterm clinical outcomes of DCB treatment in patients with <i>de novo</i> coronary lesions >3.0 mm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of 1,514 consecutive patients who received paclitaxel DCB angioplasty to treat <i>de novo</i> coronary lesions at Beijing Anzhen Hospital between June 2019 and November 2021. Lesions with a reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥3.0 mm were defined as large-vessel disease (LVD), and lesions with an RVD ≤2.75 mm were defined as small-vessel disease (SVD). The LVD and SVD groups included 462 and 1,052 patients, respectively. The end points of the study were all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Outcomes were compared between the LVD and SVD groups. The median follow-up was 34.2 months [interquartile range (IQR), 31.3 to 39.7 months] in the overall cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,514 patients, 43 (2.8%) died, 21 (1.4%) experienced MI, and 21 (1.4%) experienced stroke; 167 (11.0%) underwent TVR. No significant differences were observed in mortality rate (LVD: 2.4%; SVD: 3.0%; P=0.32), MI (LVD: 1.1%; SVD: 1.5%; P=0.37), stroke (LVD: 0.9%; SVD: 1.6%, P=0.19) and TVR (LVD: 11.9%; SVD: 10.6%, P=0.92). After multivariate adjustment, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for LVD versus SVD were 1.092 (0.447-2.670; P=0.85) for death, 1.424 (0.464-4.369; P=0.54) for MI, 1.604 (0.529-4.864; P=0.40) for stroke, and 0.995 (0.719-1.378; P=0.98) for TVR, with no significant differences observed in any endpoints between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings from this study indicate that the prognosis of DCB for patients with <i>de novo</i> lesions in vessels exceeding 3.0 mm are not significantly different compared to those of DCB for patients with SVD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13345803/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt-2025-1-634\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt-2025-1-634","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管许多涉及小血管新生冠状动脉疾病的研究表明,药物包被球囊(DCBs)血管成形术提供了临床益处,但DCB在大血管病变中的临床价值尚不清楚。因此,我们进行了一项真实世界的研究,以评估DCB治疗新发冠状动脉病变患者的中期临床结果。方法:我们对2019年6月至2021年11月在北京安贞医院接受紫杉醇DCB血管成形术治疗新发冠状动脉病变的1,514例连续患者进行了回顾性研究。参考血管直径(RVD)≥3.0 mm定义为大血管病变(LVD), RVD≤2.75 mm定义为小血管病变(SVD)。LVD组和SVD组分别包括462例和1052例患者。研究的终点是全因死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、卒中和靶血管重建术(TVR)。比较LVD组和SVD组的结果。整个队列的中位随访时间为34.2个月[四分位间距(IQR), 31.3至39.7个月]。结果:1514例患者中,43例(2.8%)死亡,21例(1.4%)发生心肌梗死,21例(1.4%)发生脑卒中;167例(11.0%)行TVR。两组死亡率(LVD: 2.4%, SVD: 3.0%, P=0.32)、心肌梗死(LVD: 1.1%, SVD: 1.5%, P=0.37)、卒中(LVD: 0.9%, SVD: 1.6%, P=0.19)和TVR (LVD: 11.9%, SVD: 10.6%, P=0.92)无显著差异。多因素调整后,LVD与SVD的校正风险比(hr)[95%可信区间(CI)]分别为:死亡1.092 (0.447-2.670,P=0.85)、心肌梗死1.424 (0.464-4.369,P=0.54)、卒中1.604 (0.529-4.864,P=0.40)、TVR 0.995 (0.719-1.378, P=0.98),两组间任何终点均无显著差异。结论:本研究结果表明,血管新生病变超过3.0 mm的患者DCB的预后与SVD患者DCB的预后无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mid-term outcomes of using drug-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of large vessel de novo coronary lesions: comparison of large and small vessels.

Background: Although a number of studies involving small-vessel de novo coronary disease have indicated that drug-coated balloons (DCBs) angioplasty, provides clinical benefits, the clinical value of DCB in large-vessel lesions remains unclear. We therefore conducted a real-world study to evaluate the midterm clinical outcomes of DCB treatment in patients with de novo coronary lesions >3.0 mm.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 1,514 consecutive patients who received paclitaxel DCB angioplasty to treat de novo coronary lesions at Beijing Anzhen Hospital between June 2019 and November 2021. Lesions with a reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥3.0 mm were defined as large-vessel disease (LVD), and lesions with an RVD ≤2.75 mm were defined as small-vessel disease (SVD). The LVD and SVD groups included 462 and 1,052 patients, respectively. The end points of the study were all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Outcomes were compared between the LVD and SVD groups. The median follow-up was 34.2 months [interquartile range (IQR), 31.3 to 39.7 months] in the overall cohort.

Results: Of the 1,514 patients, 43 (2.8%) died, 21 (1.4%) experienced MI, and 21 (1.4%) experienced stroke; 167 (11.0%) underwent TVR. No significant differences were observed in mortality rate (LVD: 2.4%; SVD: 3.0%; P=0.32), MI (LVD: 1.1%; SVD: 1.5%; P=0.37), stroke (LVD: 0.9%; SVD: 1.6%, P=0.19) and TVR (LVD: 11.9%; SVD: 10.6%, P=0.92). After multivariate adjustment, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for LVD versus SVD were 1.092 (0.447-2.670; P=0.85) for death, 1.424 (0.464-4.369; P=0.54) for MI, 1.604 (0.529-4.864; P=0.40) for stroke, and 0.995 (0.719-1.378; P=0.98) for TVR, with no significant differences observed in any endpoints between the two groups.

Conclusions: The findings from this study indicate that the prognosis of DCB for patients with de novo lesions in vessels exceeding 3.0 mm are not significantly different compared to those of DCB for patients with SVD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy
Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The journal ''Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy'' (Print ISSN: 2223-3652; Online ISSN: 2223-3660) accepts basic and clinical science submissions related to Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery. The mission of the journal is the rapid exchange of scientific information between clinicians and scientists worldwide. To reach this goal, the journal will focus on novel media, using a web-based, digital format in addition to traditional print-version. This includes on-line submission, review, publication, and distribution. The digital format will also allow submission of extensive supporting visual material, both images and video. The website www.thecdt.org will serve as the central hub and also allow posting of comments and on-line discussion. The web-site of the journal will be linked to a number of international web-sites (e.g. www.dxy.cn), which will significantly expand the distribution of its contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书