{"title":"药物包被球囊血管成形术治疗大血管新生冠状动脉病变的中期结果:大血管与小血管的比较","authors":"Wenjie Wang, Zhonghua Sun, Yong Zeng, Xianpeng Yu","doi":"10.21037/cdt-2025-1-634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although a number of studies involving small-vessel <i>de novo</i> coronary disease have indicated that drug-coated balloons (DCBs) angioplasty, provides clinical benefits, the clinical value of DCB in large-vessel lesions remains unclear. We therefore conducted a real-world study to evaluate the midterm clinical outcomes of DCB treatment in patients with <i>de novo</i> coronary lesions >3.0 mm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of 1,514 consecutive patients who received paclitaxel DCB angioplasty to treat <i>de novo</i> coronary lesions at Beijing Anzhen Hospital between June 2019 and November 2021. Lesions with a reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥3.0 mm were defined as large-vessel disease (LVD), and lesions with an RVD ≤2.75 mm were defined as small-vessel disease (SVD). The LVD and SVD groups included 462 and 1,052 patients, respectively. The end points of the study were all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Outcomes were compared between the LVD and SVD groups. The median follow-up was 34.2 months [interquartile range (IQR), 31.3 to 39.7 months] in the overall cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,514 patients, 43 (2.8%) died, 21 (1.4%) experienced MI, and 21 (1.4%) experienced stroke; 167 (11.0%) underwent TVR. No significant differences were observed in mortality rate (LVD: 2.4%; SVD: 3.0%; P=0.32), MI (LVD: 1.1%; SVD: 1.5%; P=0.37), stroke (LVD: 0.9%; SVD: 1.6%, P=0.19) and TVR (LVD: 11.9%; SVD: 10.6%, P=0.92). After multivariate adjustment, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for LVD versus SVD were 1.092 (0.447-2.670; P=0.85) for death, 1.424 (0.464-4.369; P=0.54) for MI, 1.604 (0.529-4.864; P=0.40) for stroke, and 0.995 (0.719-1.378; P=0.98) for TVR, with no significant differences observed in any endpoints between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings from this study indicate that the prognosis of DCB for patients with <i>de novo</i> lesions in vessels exceeding 3.0 mm are not significantly different compared to those of DCB for patients with SVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9592,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy","volume":"16 3","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13345803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mid-term outcomes of using drug-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of large vessel <i>de novo</i> coronary lesions: comparison of large and small vessels.\",\"authors\":\"Wenjie Wang, Zhonghua Sun, Yong Zeng, Xianpeng Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/cdt-2025-1-634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although a number of studies involving small-vessel <i>de novo</i> coronary disease have indicated that drug-coated balloons (DCBs) angioplasty, provides clinical benefits, the clinical value of DCB in large-vessel lesions remains unclear. We therefore conducted a real-world study to evaluate the midterm clinical outcomes of DCB treatment in patients with <i>de novo</i> coronary lesions >3.0 mm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of 1,514 consecutive patients who received paclitaxel DCB angioplasty to treat <i>de novo</i> coronary lesions at Beijing Anzhen Hospital between June 2019 and November 2021. Lesions with a reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥3.0 mm were defined as large-vessel disease (LVD), and lesions with an RVD ≤2.75 mm were defined as small-vessel disease (SVD). The LVD and SVD groups included 462 and 1,052 patients, respectively. The end points of the study were all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Outcomes were compared between the LVD and SVD groups. The median follow-up was 34.2 months [interquartile range (IQR), 31.3 to 39.7 months] in the overall cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,514 patients, 43 (2.8%) died, 21 (1.4%) experienced MI, and 21 (1.4%) experienced stroke; 167 (11.0%) underwent TVR. No significant differences were observed in mortality rate (LVD: 2.4%; SVD: 3.0%; P=0.32), MI (LVD: 1.1%; SVD: 1.5%; P=0.37), stroke (LVD: 0.9%; SVD: 1.6%, P=0.19) and TVR (LVD: 11.9%; SVD: 10.6%, P=0.92). After multivariate adjustment, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for LVD versus SVD were 1.092 (0.447-2.670; P=0.85) for death, 1.424 (0.464-4.369; P=0.54) for MI, 1.604 (0.529-4.864; P=0.40) for stroke, and 0.995 (0.719-1.378; P=0.98) for TVR, with no significant differences observed in any endpoints between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings from this study indicate that the prognosis of DCB for patients with <i>de novo</i> lesions in vessels exceeding 3.0 mm are not significantly different compared to those of DCB for patients with SVD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13345803/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt-2025-1-634\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt-2025-1-634","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mid-term outcomes of using drug-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of large vessel de novo coronary lesions: comparison of large and small vessels.
Background: Although a number of studies involving small-vessel de novo coronary disease have indicated that drug-coated balloons (DCBs) angioplasty, provides clinical benefits, the clinical value of DCB in large-vessel lesions remains unclear. We therefore conducted a real-world study to evaluate the midterm clinical outcomes of DCB treatment in patients with de novo coronary lesions >3.0 mm.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 1,514 consecutive patients who received paclitaxel DCB angioplasty to treat de novo coronary lesions at Beijing Anzhen Hospital between June 2019 and November 2021. Lesions with a reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥3.0 mm were defined as large-vessel disease (LVD), and lesions with an RVD ≤2.75 mm were defined as small-vessel disease (SVD). The LVD and SVD groups included 462 and 1,052 patients, respectively. The end points of the study were all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Outcomes were compared between the LVD and SVD groups. The median follow-up was 34.2 months [interquartile range (IQR), 31.3 to 39.7 months] in the overall cohort.
Results: Of the 1,514 patients, 43 (2.8%) died, 21 (1.4%) experienced MI, and 21 (1.4%) experienced stroke; 167 (11.0%) underwent TVR. No significant differences were observed in mortality rate (LVD: 2.4%; SVD: 3.0%; P=0.32), MI (LVD: 1.1%; SVD: 1.5%; P=0.37), stroke (LVD: 0.9%; SVD: 1.6%, P=0.19) and TVR (LVD: 11.9%; SVD: 10.6%, P=0.92). After multivariate adjustment, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for LVD versus SVD were 1.092 (0.447-2.670; P=0.85) for death, 1.424 (0.464-4.369; P=0.54) for MI, 1.604 (0.529-4.864; P=0.40) for stroke, and 0.995 (0.719-1.378; P=0.98) for TVR, with no significant differences observed in any endpoints between the two groups.
Conclusions: The findings from this study indicate that the prognosis of DCB for patients with de novo lesions in vessels exceeding 3.0 mm are not significantly different compared to those of DCB for patients with SVD.
期刊介绍:
The journal ''Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy'' (Print ISSN: 2223-3652; Online ISSN: 2223-3660) accepts basic and clinical science submissions related to Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery. The mission of the journal is the rapid exchange of scientific information between clinicians and scientists worldwide. To reach this goal, the journal will focus on novel media, using a web-based, digital format in addition to traditional print-version. This includes on-line submission, review, publication, and distribution. The digital format will also allow submission of extensive supporting visual material, both images and video. The website www.thecdt.org will serve as the central hub and also allow posting of comments and on-line discussion. The web-site of the journal will be linked to a number of international web-sites (e.g. www.dxy.cn), which will significantly expand the distribution of its contents.