老年急性肺栓塞抗凝患者出血风险评分的短期表现。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Thrombosis research Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-11 DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2026.109744
Yuzhi Tao, Xianglong Meng, Han Tian, Xincheng Li, Rui Liang, Yinong Chen, Hong Chen, Chunling Dong, Yiwei Shi, Xiaomao Xu, Maoyun Wang, Ling Zhu, Yingqun Ji, Juhong Shi, Hong Chen, Zhe Cheng, Yanxia Li, Chaosheng Deng, Qin Luo, Pinyao Lu, Chen Wang
{"title":"老年急性肺栓塞抗凝患者出血风险评分的短期表现。","authors":"Yuzhi Tao,&nbsp;Xianglong Meng,&nbsp;Han Tian,&nbsp;Xincheng Li,&nbsp;Rui Liang,&nbsp;Yinong Chen,&nbsp;Hong Chen,&nbsp;Chunling Dong,&nbsp;Yiwei Shi,&nbsp;Xiaomao Xu,&nbsp;Maoyun Wang,&nbsp;Ling Zhu,&nbsp;Yingqun Ji,&nbsp;Juhong Shi,&nbsp;Hong Chen,&nbsp;Zhe Cheng,&nbsp;Yanxia Li,&nbsp;Chaosheng Deng,&nbsp;Qin Luo,&nbsp;Pinyao Lu,&nbsp;Chen Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.thromres.2026.109744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Older patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) are at increased risk of bleeding, which is associated with adverse outcomes, making early risk assessment particularly important. This study evaluated the short-term performance of commonly used bleeding risk scores in patients aged ≥65 years.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An analysis was conducted in a multicenter, prospective study of patients aged ≥65 years with PE receiving anticoagulation (<span><span>NCT02943343</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, 2016). The performance of the PE-SARD, Kuijer, RIETE, BACS, and ATRIA scores was evaluated using the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Calibration was assessed with calibration plots. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were calculated. The primary outcomes were major bleeding (MB) at 7 and 14 days.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 3661 anticoagulated patients aged ≥65 years with acute PE, MB occurred in 18 (0.5%) and 36 (1.0%) patients at 7 and 14 days, respectively, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) in 69 (1.9%) and 105 (2.9%) patients. Patients with bleeding events had higher mortality than those without bleeding. Discrimination for short-term MB was low to moderate across scores, with RIETE (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.65–0.87) and PE-SARD (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.63–0.85) showing the most consistent performance at 7 days. Overall discrimination declined at 14 days. All scores demonstrated limited ability to predict CRNMB, and no model showed a consistent net clinical benefit.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In older patients with PE, bleeding risk scores showed low-to-moderate discrimination for short-term bleeding, with moderate early performance observed only in selected scores. None of the scores reliably identified CRNMB, highlighting the limitations of baseline risk assessment in acute care settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23064,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis research","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 109744"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-term performance of bleeding risk scores in anticoagulated older patients with acute pulmonary embolism\",\"authors\":\"Yuzhi Tao,&nbsp;Xianglong Meng,&nbsp;Han Tian,&nbsp;Xincheng Li,&nbsp;Rui Liang,&nbsp;Yinong Chen,&nbsp;Hong Chen,&nbsp;Chunling Dong,&nbsp;Yiwei Shi,&nbsp;Xiaomao Xu,&nbsp;Maoyun Wang,&nbsp;Ling Zhu,&nbsp;Yingqun Ji,&nbsp;Juhong Shi,&nbsp;Hong Chen,&nbsp;Zhe Cheng,&nbsp;Yanxia Li,&nbsp;Chaosheng Deng,&nbsp;Qin Luo,&nbsp;Pinyao Lu,&nbsp;Chen Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.thromres.2026.109744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Older patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) are at increased risk of bleeding, which is associated with adverse outcomes, making early risk assessment particularly important. This study evaluated the short-term performance of commonly used bleeding risk scores in patients aged ≥65 years.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An analysis was conducted in a multicenter, prospective study of patients aged ≥65 years with PE receiving anticoagulation (<span><span>NCT02943343</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, 2016). The performance of the PE-SARD, Kuijer, RIETE, BACS, and ATRIA scores was evaluated using the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Calibration was assessed with calibration plots. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were calculated. The primary outcomes were major bleeding (MB) at 7 and 14 days.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 3661 anticoagulated patients aged ≥65 years with acute PE, MB occurred in 18 (0.5%) and 36 (1.0%) patients at 7 and 14 days, respectively, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) in 69 (1.9%) and 105 (2.9%) patients. Patients with bleeding events had higher mortality than those without bleeding. Discrimination for short-term MB was low to moderate across scores, with RIETE (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.65–0.87) and PE-SARD (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.63–0.85) showing the most consistent performance at 7 days. Overall discrimination declined at 14 days. All scores demonstrated limited ability to predict CRNMB, and no model showed a consistent net clinical benefit.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In older patients with PE, bleeding risk scores showed low-to-moderate discrimination for short-term bleeding, with moderate early performance observed only in selected scores. None of the scores reliably identified CRNMB, highlighting the limitations of baseline risk assessment in acute care settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis research\",\"volume\":\"263 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109744\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384826001635\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/6/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384826001635","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年肺栓塞(PE)患者出血风险增加,与不良结局相关,因此早期风险评估尤为重要。本研究评估了≥65岁患者常用出血风险评分的短期表现。方法:对年龄≥65岁PE患者接受抗凝治疗的多中心前瞻性研究(NCT02943343, 2016)进行分析。PE-SARD、Kuijer、RIETE、BACS和ATRIA评分采用随时间变化的曲线下面积(AUC)分析进行评估。用校准图评估校准。计算敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值。主要结局为第7天和第14天大出血(MB)。结果:在3661例≥65岁的急性PE抗凝患者中,7天和14天分别有18例(0.5%)和36例(1.0%)发生MB, 69例(1.9%)和105例(2.9%)患者出现临床相关非大出血(CRNMB)。出血患者的死亡率高于无出血患者。对短期MB的辨别在评分上是低到中等的,RIETE (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.87)和PE-SARD (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.85)在7天表现出最一致的表现。总体歧视在第14天下降。所有评分显示预测CRNMB的能力有限,没有模型显示出一致的净临床益处。结论:在老年PE患者中,出血风险评分对短期出血表现出低到中度的区分,仅在选定的评分中观察到中度的早期表现。没有一个评分可靠地识别CRNMB,突出了在急性护理环境中基线风险评估的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short-term performance of bleeding risk scores in anticoagulated older patients with acute pulmonary embolism

Background

Older patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) are at increased risk of bleeding, which is associated with adverse outcomes, making early risk assessment particularly important. This study evaluated the short-term performance of commonly used bleeding risk scores in patients aged ≥65 years.

Methods

An analysis was conducted in a multicenter, prospective study of patients aged ≥65 years with PE receiving anticoagulation (NCT02943343, 2016). The performance of the PE-SARD, Kuijer, RIETE, BACS, and ATRIA scores was evaluated using the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Calibration was assessed with calibration plots. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were calculated. The primary outcomes were major bleeding (MB) at 7 and 14 days.

Results

Among 3661 anticoagulated patients aged ≥65 years with acute PE, MB occurred in 18 (0.5%) and 36 (1.0%) patients at 7 and 14 days, respectively, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) in 69 (1.9%) and 105 (2.9%) patients. Patients with bleeding events had higher mortality than those without bleeding. Discrimination for short-term MB was low to moderate across scores, with RIETE (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.65–0.87) and PE-SARD (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.63–0.85) showing the most consistent performance at 7 days. Overall discrimination declined at 14 days. All scores demonstrated limited ability to predict CRNMB, and no model showed a consistent net clinical benefit.

Conclusions

In older patients with PE, bleeding risk scores showed low-to-moderate discrimination for short-term bleeding, with moderate early performance observed only in selected scores. None of the scores reliably identified CRNMB, highlighting the limitations of baseline risk assessment in acute care settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis research
Thrombosis research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
364
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Thrombosis Research is an international journal dedicated to the swift dissemination of new information on thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular biology, aimed at advancing both science and clinical care. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, editorials, opinions, and critiques, covering both basic and clinical studies. Priority is given to research that promises novel approaches in the diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and prevention of thrombotic and hemorrhagic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书