2025韩国心肺复苏指南:第10部分。强化生存链的教育和制度实施。

IF 3.4 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-31 DOI:10.15441/ceem.26.097
Yunhee Oh, Youdong Sohn, Mi Jin Lee, Sang-Hoon Na, Jundong Moon, Heeje Yun, Hoon Jung, Chang Hee Lee, Sung Phil Chung, Do Kyun Kim, Tae-Youn Kim, Gyuhong Shim, Young Hwa Jung, Chun Song Youn, Jisook Lee, Youngbin Jang, Yong Soo Jang, Gyu Chong Cho, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Ju Sun Heo, Sung Oh Hwang
{"title":"2025韩国心肺复苏指南:第10部分。强化生存链的教育和制度实施。","authors":"Yunhee Oh, Youdong Sohn, Mi Jin Lee, Sang-Hoon Na, Jundong Moon, Heeje Yun, Hoon Jung, Chang Hee Lee, Sung Phil Chung, Do Kyun Kim, Tae-Youn Kim, Gyuhong Shim, Young Hwa Jung, Chun Song Youn, Jisook Lee, Youngbin Jang, Yong Soo Jang, Gyu Chong Cho, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Ju Sun Heo, Sung Oh Hwang","doi":"10.15441/ceem.26.097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2025 Korean education and system implementation guidelines were updated using a structured evidence evaluation process and recent systematic reviews. The guidelines present a comprehensive update that aims to bridge the gap between educational theory and clinical performance and emphasize the transition toward high-fidelity, field-based training environments through the implementation of in situ simulation and rapid cycle deliberate practice to foster automaticity in high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and team coordination. The integration of real-time feedback devices during training and the adoption of structured \"hot\" and \"cold\" debriefing to maximize learning outcomes are critical shifts in this update. Furthermore, these guidelines enhance teamwork competency by recommending the integration of a dedicated CPR coach within the hospital code team. Despite acknowledging the potential of digital health, a cautious approach toward gamified and blended learning is maintained. The guidelines prioritize face-to-face instruction to ensure psychomotor proficiency. From a policy perspective, the 2025 update removes the prehospital termination of resuscitation criteria in alignment with domestic legal constraints and social consensus. In addition to context-based training strategies within hospitals, we discussed the mandatory age for CPR training. We also added recommendations to address the \"decoupling\" between high automated external defibrillator awareness and low bystander utilization rates in the prehospital setting. In conclusion, the 2025 Korean guidelines emphasize repetitive, evidence-based educational methods and systematic policy refinements to enhance resuscitation quality and survival outcomes across clinical and community settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":"13 Suppl 1","pages":"S169-S184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13277416/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Part 10. Education and system implementation for enhanced chain of survival.\",\"authors\":\"Yunhee Oh, Youdong Sohn, Mi Jin Lee, Sang-Hoon Na, Jundong Moon, Heeje Yun, Hoon Jung, Chang Hee Lee, Sung Phil Chung, Do Kyun Kim, Tae-Youn Kim, Gyuhong Shim, Young Hwa Jung, Chun Song Youn, Jisook Lee, Youngbin Jang, Yong Soo Jang, Gyu Chong Cho, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Ju Sun Heo, Sung Oh Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.15441/ceem.26.097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The 2025 Korean education and system implementation guidelines were updated using a structured evidence evaluation process and recent systematic reviews. The guidelines present a comprehensive update that aims to bridge the gap between educational theory and clinical performance and emphasize the transition toward high-fidelity, field-based training environments through the implementation of in situ simulation and rapid cycle deliberate practice to foster automaticity in high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and team coordination. The integration of real-time feedback devices during training and the adoption of structured \\\"hot\\\" and \\\"cold\\\" debriefing to maximize learning outcomes are critical shifts in this update. Furthermore, these guidelines enhance teamwork competency by recommending the integration of a dedicated CPR coach within the hospital code team. Despite acknowledging the potential of digital health, a cautious approach toward gamified and blended learning is maintained. The guidelines prioritize face-to-face instruction to ensure psychomotor proficiency. From a policy perspective, the 2025 update removes the prehospital termination of resuscitation criteria in alignment with domestic legal constraints and social consensus. In addition to context-based training strategies within hospitals, we discussed the mandatory age for CPR training. We also added recommendations to address the \\\"decoupling\\\" between high automated external defibrillator awareness and low bystander utilization rates in the prehospital setting. In conclusion, the 2025 Korean guidelines emphasize repetitive, evidence-based educational methods and systematic policy refinements to enhance resuscitation quality and survival outcomes across clinical and community settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"S169-S184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13277416/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.26.097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/5/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.26.097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用结构化证据评估过程和最近的系统审查,更新了2025年韩国教育和系统实施指南。该指南提供了一个全面的更新,旨在弥合教育理论和临床表现之间的差距,并强调通过实施原位模拟和快速循环故意练习向高保真,基于现场的培训环境过渡,以培养高质量心肺复苏(CPR)的自动化和团队协调。在培训过程中集成实时反馈设备和采用结构化的“热”和“冷”汇报以最大限度地提高学习成果是此次更新的关键转变。此外,这些指南通过建议在医院代码团队中整合专门的CPR教练来提高团队合作能力。尽管承认数字健康的潜力,但对游戏化和混合学习仍持谨慎态度。指导方针优先考虑面对面指导,以确保精神运动的熟练程度。从政策角度来看,2025年更新版根据国内法律限制和社会共识取消了院前终止复苏标准。除了医院内基于情境的培训策略外,我们还讨论了心肺复苏术培训的法定年龄。我们还增加了一些建议,以解决院前环境中高自动化体外除颤器意识与低旁观者使用率之间的“脱钩”。总之,2025年韩国指南强调重复的、循证的教育方法和系统的政策改进,以提高临床和社区环境中的复苏质量和生存结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Part 10. Education and system implementation for enhanced chain of survival.

The 2025 Korean education and system implementation guidelines were updated using a structured evidence evaluation process and recent systematic reviews. The guidelines present a comprehensive update that aims to bridge the gap between educational theory and clinical performance and emphasize the transition toward high-fidelity, field-based training environments through the implementation of in situ simulation and rapid cycle deliberate practice to foster automaticity in high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and team coordination. The integration of real-time feedback devices during training and the adoption of structured "hot" and "cold" debriefing to maximize learning outcomes are critical shifts in this update. Furthermore, these guidelines enhance teamwork competency by recommending the integration of a dedicated CPR coach within the hospital code team. Despite acknowledging the potential of digital health, a cautious approach toward gamified and blended learning is maintained. The guidelines prioritize face-to-face instruction to ensure psychomotor proficiency. From a policy perspective, the 2025 update removes the prehospital termination of resuscitation criteria in alignment with domestic legal constraints and social consensus. In addition to context-based training strategies within hospitals, we discussed the mandatory age for CPR training. We also added recommendations to address the "decoupling" between high automated external defibrillator awareness and low bystander utilization rates in the prehospital setting. In conclusion, the 2025 Korean guidelines emphasize repetitive, evidence-based educational methods and systematic policy refinements to enhance resuscitation quality and survival outcomes across clinical and community settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书