人工智能支持的思考-配对-分享教学对学生二次方程学习动机和问题解决能力的影响:社会建构主义视角

IF 5.7 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Belaynesh Kassanew, Cathy Weng, Melese Astatke, Yamral Kassanew
{"title":"人工智能支持的思考-配对-分享教学对学生二次方程学习动机和问题解决能力的影响:社会建构主义视角","authors":"Belaynesh Kassanew,&nbsp;Cathy Weng,&nbsp;Melese Astatke,&nbsp;Yamral Kassanew","doi":"10.1002/jcal.70271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Quadratic equations are a cornerstone of algebra and serve as a gateway to advanced mathematical concepts. Despite their importance, students frequently struggle with conceptual understanding, procedural accuracy, and sustained motivation when learning mathematics, particularly quadratic equations. Traditional instruction often fails to address these difficulties, leading to persistent misconceptions and disengagement. Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise in offering adaptive feedback and customised support, but research mainly focuses on its role in helping individual learners. On the other hand, the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) model, grounded in Vygotsky's social constructivist theory, has been proven effective in fostering collaboration, critical thinking, and communication. However, limited studies have explored how AI can be systematically integrated into structured collaborative learning approaches such as TPS to enhance both problem-solving and motivation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study introduces a novel instructional model that embeds AI scaffolding into each phase of the TPS process. Rather than replacing teacher facilitation, AI functions as a supportive scaffold that delivers individualised prompts during the <i>Think</i> stage, facilitates peer negotiation in the <i>Pair</i> stage, and provides clarification or reinforcement in the <i>Share</i> stage. This integration ensures consistent, contextualised guidance while maintaining the collaborative essence of TPS. The study therefore, aims to examine the effectiveness of AI-supported TPS instruction in enhancing junior high school students' problem-solving skills and motivation in learning quadratic equations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study employed a quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group. A total of 43 junior high school students participated, with the experimental group receiving AI-enhanced TPS instruction and the control group following traditional TPS instruction with online Google searches. Data were collected using two instruments: a problem-solving test to measure students' learning outcomes and a mathematics motivation questionnaire to assess intrinsic motivation, interest, and self-efficacy. The data were analysed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to control for pre-test differences and determine the impact of the intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings indicate significant improvements in both problem-solving skills and motivation for the experimental group compared to the control group. Integrating AI tools within the TPS framework not only enhances cognitive outcomes but also fosters greater student engagement, highlighting the potential of technology to transform mathematics education.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of AI-Supported Think-Pair-Share Instruction on Students' Problem-Solving Skills and Motivation in Learning Quadratic Equations: A Social Constructivist Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Belaynesh Kassanew,&nbsp;Cathy Weng,&nbsp;Melese Astatke,&nbsp;Yamral Kassanew\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcal.70271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Quadratic equations are a cornerstone of algebra and serve as a gateway to advanced mathematical concepts. Despite their importance, students frequently struggle with conceptual understanding, procedural accuracy, and sustained motivation when learning mathematics, particularly quadratic equations. Traditional instruction often fails to address these difficulties, leading to persistent misconceptions and disengagement. Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise in offering adaptive feedback and customised support, but research mainly focuses on its role in helping individual learners. On the other hand, the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) model, grounded in Vygotsky's social constructivist theory, has been proven effective in fostering collaboration, critical thinking, and communication. However, limited studies have explored how AI can be systematically integrated into structured collaborative learning approaches such as TPS to enhance both problem-solving and motivation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Rationale and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study introduces a novel instructional model that embeds AI scaffolding into each phase of the TPS process. Rather than replacing teacher facilitation, AI functions as a supportive scaffold that delivers individualised prompts during the <i>Think</i> stage, facilitates peer negotiation in the <i>Pair</i> stage, and provides clarification or reinforcement in the <i>Share</i> stage. This integration ensures consistent, contextualised guidance while maintaining the collaborative essence of TPS. The study therefore, aims to examine the effectiveness of AI-supported TPS instruction in enhancing junior high school students' problem-solving skills and motivation in learning quadratic equations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study employed a quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group. A total of 43 junior high school students participated, with the experimental group receiving AI-enhanced TPS instruction and the control group following traditional TPS instruction with online Google searches. Data were collected using two instruments: a problem-solving test to measure students' learning outcomes and a mathematics motivation questionnaire to assess intrinsic motivation, interest, and self-efficacy. The data were analysed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to control for pre-test differences and determine the impact of the intervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings indicate significant improvements in both problem-solving skills and motivation for the experimental group compared to the control group. Integrating AI tools within the TPS framework not only enhances cognitive outcomes but also fosters greater student engagement, highlighting the potential of technology to transform mathematics education.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"volume\":\"42 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcal.70271\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcal.70271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

二次方程是代数的基石,也是通往高级数学概念的门户。尽管它们很重要,但学生在学习数学,特别是二次方程时,经常在概念理解、程序准确性和持续动机方面挣扎。传统的教学往往不能解决这些困难,导致持续的误解和脱离接触。人工智能(AI)有望提供自适应反馈和定制支持,但研究主要集中在它在帮助个体学习者方面的作用。另一方面,基于维果茨基社会建构主义理论的思考-配对-分享(Think-Pair-Share, TPS)模式已被证明在促进协作、批判性思维和沟通方面是有效的。然而,有限的研究探索了如何将人工智能系统地集成到结构化的协作学习方法(如TPS)中,以增强解决问题和激励。本研究介绍了一种新的教学模型,该模型将人工智能脚手架嵌入到TPS过程的每个阶段。人工智能并没有取代教师的引导,而是作为一个支持性的脚手架,在思考阶段提供个性化的提示,在配对阶段促进同伴协商,在分享阶段提供澄清或强化。这种整合确保了一致的、情境化的指导,同时保持了TPS的协作本质。因此,本研究旨在检验人工智能支持的TPS教学在提高初中生解决问题的能力和学习二次方程的动机方面的有效性。方法采用准实验设计,设非等效对照组。共有43名初中生参与,实验组接受人工智能增强TPS教学,对照组接受传统TPS教学并在线搜索谷歌。数据收集使用两种工具:解决问题的测试,以衡量学生的学习成果和数学动机问卷评估内在动机,兴趣和自我效能感。使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)对数据进行分析,以控制测试前差异并确定干预的影响。结果与结论与对照组相比,实验组在解决问题的能力和动机方面都有显著提高。将人工智能工具整合到TPS框架中,不仅可以提高认知结果,还可以促进学生的更多参与,突出了技术改变数学教育的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of AI-Supported Think-Pair-Share Instruction on Students' Problem-Solving Skills and Motivation in Learning Quadratic Equations: A Social Constructivist Perspective

Background

Quadratic equations are a cornerstone of algebra and serve as a gateway to advanced mathematical concepts. Despite their importance, students frequently struggle with conceptual understanding, procedural accuracy, and sustained motivation when learning mathematics, particularly quadratic equations. Traditional instruction often fails to address these difficulties, leading to persistent misconceptions and disengagement. Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise in offering adaptive feedback and customised support, but research mainly focuses on its role in helping individual learners. On the other hand, the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) model, grounded in Vygotsky's social constructivist theory, has been proven effective in fostering collaboration, critical thinking, and communication. However, limited studies have explored how AI can be systematically integrated into structured collaborative learning approaches such as TPS to enhance both problem-solving and motivation.

Rationale and Objectives

This study introduces a novel instructional model that embeds AI scaffolding into each phase of the TPS process. Rather than replacing teacher facilitation, AI functions as a supportive scaffold that delivers individualised prompts during the Think stage, facilitates peer negotiation in the Pair stage, and provides clarification or reinforcement in the Share stage. This integration ensures consistent, contextualised guidance while maintaining the collaborative essence of TPS. The study therefore, aims to examine the effectiveness of AI-supported TPS instruction in enhancing junior high school students' problem-solving skills and motivation in learning quadratic equations.

Methods

This study employed a quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group. A total of 43 junior high school students participated, with the experimental group receiving AI-enhanced TPS instruction and the control group following traditional TPS instruction with online Google searches. Data were collected using two instruments: a problem-solving test to measure students' learning outcomes and a mathematics motivation questionnaire to assess intrinsic motivation, interest, and self-efficacy. The data were analysed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to control for pre-test differences and determine the impact of the intervention.

Results and Conclusions

The findings indicate significant improvements in both problem-solving skills and motivation for the experimental group compared to the control group. Integrating AI tools within the TPS framework not only enhances cognitive outcomes but also fosters greater student engagement, highlighting the potential of technology to transform mathematics education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书