{"title":"老年受试者的简单运动和音位加工反应时间。","authors":"M P Rastatter, S B Hood","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Simple motor reaction time (RT) was measured for arm movement in response to a known monosyllable presented by earphone. The required direction of movement (L or R) was known to S. Choice RT was also measured: only one word of a pair of taped monosyllabic words, differing only in the prevocalic consonant (e.g., tea-key) was presented by earphone. Simultaneously, a picture of each word appeared on response plates, one to the L and one to the R of the center rest position. S had to touch the response plate with the picture of the word heard. Subtracting simple from choice RT, in msec, yielded an estimate of auditory-phonemic processing (decoding) time. Data were collected from generally normal, healthy, elderly Ss [Grp I (10 M, 10 F) of 72 yrs mean age, and Grp II (7 M, 9 F) of 84 yrs mean age] and a control group (9 M, 9 F) of 21 yrs mean age. An ANOVA with repeated measures showed that significant differences existed among the 3 groups. A similar ANOVA procedure on phonemic processing time revealed that significant differences existed between the younger and the older Ss, but not between Grps I vs II. Collectively, these findings were taken to suggest that advanced age does not affect all behavioral operations in a generalized fashion. It was suggested that auditory-phonemic processing is more resistant to the aging process than manual responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":76646,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of auditory research","volume":"26 3","pages":"157-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simple motor and phonemic processing reaction times of elderly subjects.\",\"authors\":\"M P Rastatter, S B Hood\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Simple motor reaction time (RT) was measured for arm movement in response to a known monosyllable presented by earphone. The required direction of movement (L or R) was known to S. Choice RT was also measured: only one word of a pair of taped monosyllabic words, differing only in the prevocalic consonant (e.g., tea-key) was presented by earphone. Simultaneously, a picture of each word appeared on response plates, one to the L and one to the R of the center rest position. S had to touch the response plate with the picture of the word heard. Subtracting simple from choice RT, in msec, yielded an estimate of auditory-phonemic processing (decoding) time. Data were collected from generally normal, healthy, elderly Ss [Grp I (10 M, 10 F) of 72 yrs mean age, and Grp II (7 M, 9 F) of 84 yrs mean age] and a control group (9 M, 9 F) of 21 yrs mean age. An ANOVA with repeated measures showed that significant differences existed among the 3 groups. A similar ANOVA procedure on phonemic processing time revealed that significant differences existed between the younger and the older Ss, but not between Grps I vs II. Collectively, these findings were taken to suggest that advanced age does not affect all behavioral operations in a generalized fashion. It was suggested that auditory-phonemic processing is more resistant to the aging process than manual responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of auditory research\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"157-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of auditory research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of auditory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简单运动反应时间(RT)测量手臂运动对已知单音节耳机的反应。s知道所需的移动方向(L或R),选择RT也被测量:在一对录音单音节单词中,只有一个单词通过耳机呈现,不同的只是前声母辅音(例如,tea-key)。与此同时,每个单词的图片出现在响应板上,一个指向中间休息位置的L,一个指向R。S必须触摸带有所听单词图片的反应板。从选择RT中减去simple,在msec中,得到了听觉音素处理(解码)时间的估计。数据收集于一般正常、健康的老年Ss [I组(10 M, 10 F)平均年龄72岁,II组(7 M, 9 F)平均年龄84岁]和对照组(9 M, 9 F)平均年龄21岁。重复测量的方差分析显示,三组间存在显著差异。对音素加工时间进行类似的方差分析,发现年轻和年长学生之间存在显著差异,但第1组和第2组之间不存在显著差异。总的来说,这些发现表明,高龄并不会普遍影响所有的行为操作。结果表明,听觉音素加工比手动反应更能抵抗老化过程。
Simple motor and phonemic processing reaction times of elderly subjects.
Simple motor reaction time (RT) was measured for arm movement in response to a known monosyllable presented by earphone. The required direction of movement (L or R) was known to S. Choice RT was also measured: only one word of a pair of taped monosyllabic words, differing only in the prevocalic consonant (e.g., tea-key) was presented by earphone. Simultaneously, a picture of each word appeared on response plates, one to the L and one to the R of the center rest position. S had to touch the response plate with the picture of the word heard. Subtracting simple from choice RT, in msec, yielded an estimate of auditory-phonemic processing (decoding) time. Data were collected from generally normal, healthy, elderly Ss [Grp I (10 M, 10 F) of 72 yrs mean age, and Grp II (7 M, 9 F) of 84 yrs mean age] and a control group (9 M, 9 F) of 21 yrs mean age. An ANOVA with repeated measures showed that significant differences existed among the 3 groups. A similar ANOVA procedure on phonemic processing time revealed that significant differences existed between the younger and the older Ss, but not between Grps I vs II. Collectively, these findings were taken to suggest that advanced age does not affect all behavioral operations in a generalized fashion. It was suggested that auditory-phonemic processing is more resistant to the aging process than manual responses.