认真对待精算公平:在保险中道德地使用遗传学需要什么?

IF 3.4 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Journal of Law and the Biosciences Pub Date : 2026-05-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/jlb/lsag017
Harisan Nasir, Benjamin E Berkman, Leila Jamal, Chloe Connor, Anya E R Prince
{"title":"认真对待精算公平:在保险中道德地使用遗传学需要什么?","authors":"Harisan Nasir, Benjamin E Berkman, Leila Jamal, Chloe Connor, Anya E R Prince","doi":"10.1093/jlb/lsag017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whether life insurers should be able to consider genetic information during underwriting is a long-standing debate often characterized by strong opinions on both sides. Insurers push for full access to applicants' genetic information, and consumer advocates often call for a ban on insurer use of the information. Both sides employ concepts of fairness and discrimination in supporting their position. This article considers the concept of actuarial fairness, where individuals are expected to pay for the risks they bring to an insurance pool. Currently, law and policy adopting this standard most often take a deferential approach, allowing insurers to utilize genetic information with wide latitude. This article takes seriously a middle-ground approach, broadly labeled as actuarial utility. Building from prior literature examining this issue, this article proposes a framework US policy can adopt to assist in the assessment of the actuarial utility of genetic information with a particular focus on emerging genetic technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":56266,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","volume":"13 1","pages":"lsag017"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13174401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking actuarial fairness seriously: what is required for the ethical use of genetics in insurance?\",\"authors\":\"Harisan Nasir, Benjamin E Berkman, Leila Jamal, Chloe Connor, Anya E R Prince\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jlb/lsag017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Whether life insurers should be able to consider genetic information during underwriting is a long-standing debate often characterized by strong opinions on both sides. Insurers push for full access to applicants' genetic information, and consumer advocates often call for a ban on insurer use of the information. Both sides employ concepts of fairness and discrimination in supporting their position. This article considers the concept of actuarial fairness, where individuals are expected to pay for the risks they bring to an insurance pool. Currently, law and policy adopting this standard most often take a deferential approach, allowing insurers to utilize genetic information with wide latitude. This article takes seriously a middle-ground approach, broadly labeled as actuarial utility. Building from prior literature examining this issue, this article proposes a framework US policy can adopt to assist in the assessment of the actuarial utility of genetic information with a particular focus on emerging genetic technologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and the Biosciences\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"lsag017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13174401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and the Biosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsag017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsag017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人寿保险公司是否应该在承保过程中考虑遗传信息是一个长期存在的争论,通常以双方的强烈意见为特征。保险公司要求全面获取申请人的基因信息,消费者权益倡导者经常呼吁禁止保险公司使用这些信息。双方都用公平和歧视的概念来支持自己的立场。本文考虑了精算公平的概念,即期望个人为他们给保险池带来的风险买单。目前,采用这一标准的法律和政策通常采取一种恭敬的方式,允许保险公司在广泛的范围内利用遗传信息。本文认真地采用了一种中间方法,广泛地称为精算实用程序。根据先前研究这一问题的文献,本文提出了一个框架,美国政策可以采用,以协助评估遗传信息的精算效用,特别关注新兴的遗传技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taking actuarial fairness seriously: what is required for the ethical use of genetics in insurance?

Whether life insurers should be able to consider genetic information during underwriting is a long-standing debate often characterized by strong opinions on both sides. Insurers push for full access to applicants' genetic information, and consumer advocates often call for a ban on insurer use of the information. Both sides employ concepts of fairness and discrimination in supporting their position. This article considers the concept of actuarial fairness, where individuals are expected to pay for the risks they bring to an insurance pool. Currently, law and policy adopting this standard most often take a deferential approach, allowing insurers to utilize genetic information with wide latitude. This article takes seriously a middle-ground approach, broadly labeled as actuarial utility. Building from prior literature examining this issue, this article proposes a framework US policy can adopt to assist in the assessment of the actuarial utility of genetic information with a particular focus on emerging genetic technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Law and the Biosciences
Journal of Law and the Biosciences Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Law and the Biosciences (JLB) is the first fully Open Access peer-reviewed legal journal focused on the advances at the intersection of law and the biosciences. A co-venture between Duke University, Harvard University Law School, and Stanford University, and published by Oxford University Press, this open access, online, and interdisciplinary academic journal publishes cutting-edge scholarship in this important new field. The Journal contains original and response articles, essays, and commentaries on a wide range of topics, including bioethics, neuroethics, genetics, reproductive technologies, stem cells, enhancement, patent law, and food and drug regulation. JLB is published as one volume with three issues per year with new articles posted online on an ongoing basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书