“在我们的血液里”:英国民族党杂志身份中的考古学和“土著”

IF 0.4 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Lorna-Jane Richardson
{"title":"“在我们的血液里”:英国民族党杂志身份中的考古学和“土著”","authors":"Lorna-Jane Richardson","doi":"10.1080/14655187.2025.2505375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the first diachronic analysis of the appropriation of archaeological themes in British far-right politics, focusing on the British National Party’s publication Identity from 2000 to 2009. By examining how scientific archaeological data has been manipulated to promote racist politics, this research shows how archaeological expertise can be mobilized in service of what Fortier terms ‘genetic indigenisation’ (2011: 170). The study reveals continuities between the BNP’s rhetoric and contemporary far-right groups, particularly in the manipulation of archaeological and ancient DNA research. Set against the backdrop of recent anti-immigration protests and extremist violence in the UK in 2024, this research highlights archaeology’s vulnerability to misuse and challenges assumptions about anti-expert discourse in far-right spaces. This demonstrates that academic knowledge can be selectively assembled to support contemporary nationalist agendas. This paper contributes to broader a broader understanding of far-right exploitation of heritage and argues for greater scrutiny of archaeology's role in political discourse.","PeriodicalId":45023,"journal":{"name":"Public Archaeology","volume":"23 1-4","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/99332/1/Richardson_2025_PublicArchaeology.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘In Our Blood’: Archaeology and ‘Indigeneity’ in the British National Party’s Magazine <i>Identity</i>\",\"authors\":\"Lorna-Jane Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14655187.2025.2505375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the first diachronic analysis of the appropriation of archaeological themes in British far-right politics, focusing on the British National Party’s publication Identity from 2000 to 2009. By examining how scientific archaeological data has been manipulated to promote racist politics, this research shows how archaeological expertise can be mobilized in service of what Fortier terms ‘genetic indigenisation’ (2011: 170). The study reveals continuities between the BNP’s rhetoric and contemporary far-right groups, particularly in the manipulation of archaeological and ancient DNA research. Set against the backdrop of recent anti-immigration protests and extremist violence in the UK in 2024, this research highlights archaeology’s vulnerability to misuse and challenges assumptions about anti-expert discourse in far-right spaces. This demonstrates that academic knowledge can be selectively assembled to support contemporary nationalist agendas. This paper contributes to broader a broader understanding of far-right exploitation of heritage and argues for greater scrutiny of archaeology's role in political discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"23 1-4\",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/99332/1/Richardson_2025_PublicArchaeology.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2025.2505375\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2025.2505375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文首次对英国极右翼政治中考古主题的挪用进行历时分析,重点关注2000年至2009年英国国家党出版的《身份》。通过研究科学考古数据是如何被操纵来促进种族主义政治的,这项研究显示了考古专业知识是如何被动员起来为Fortier所说的“遗传本土化”服务的(2011:170)。这项研究揭示了BNP的言论与当代极右翼团体之间的连续性,特别是在对考古和古代DNA研究的操纵方面。以2024年英国最近的反移民抗议和极端主义暴力为背景,本研究强调了考古学在误用方面的脆弱性,并挑战了关于极右翼空间中反专家话语的假设。这表明,学术知识可以选择性地汇集起来,以支持当代民族主义议程。本文有助于更广泛地理解极右翼对遗产的利用,并主张对考古学在政治话语中的作用进行更严格的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘In Our Blood’: Archaeology and ‘Indigeneity’ in the British National Party’s Magazine Identity
This paper presents the first diachronic analysis of the appropriation of archaeological themes in British far-right politics, focusing on the British National Party’s publication Identity from 2000 to 2009. By examining how scientific archaeological data has been manipulated to promote racist politics, this research shows how archaeological expertise can be mobilized in service of what Fortier terms ‘genetic indigenisation’ (2011: 170). The study reveals continuities between the BNP’s rhetoric and contemporary far-right groups, particularly in the manipulation of archaeological and ancient DNA research. Set against the backdrop of recent anti-immigration protests and extremist violence in the UK in 2024, this research highlights archaeology’s vulnerability to misuse and challenges assumptions about anti-expert discourse in far-right spaces. This demonstrates that academic knowledge can be selectively assembled to support contemporary nationalist agendas. This paper contributes to broader a broader understanding of far-right exploitation of heritage and argues for greater scrutiny of archaeology's role in political discourse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Archaeology
Public Archaeology ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书