Sanna Kulojärvi, Sara Palander, Toni Haapa, Erika Jarva, Agostinho A C Araújo, Kristina Mikkonen, Jonna Juntunen
{"title":"护生临床实践中导师同伴学习的经验:质性研究的系统回顾。","authors":"Sanna Kulojärvi, Sara Palander, Toni Haapa, Erika Jarva, Agostinho A C Araújo, Kristina Mikkonen, Jonna Juntunen","doi":"10.1111/jan.70637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To synthesise the best available evidence on mentors' experiences in mentoring nursing students during peer learning clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review of qualitative studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative or mixed-methods (with a qualitative component) studies that met the inclusion criteria based on the phenomenon of interest were included. The selected studies were critically appraised using the standardised JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. Findings from qualitative research were extracted and synthesised by using the JBI meta-aggregation approach.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in September 2024 across six databases: Scopus, CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, ProQuest (Education collection) and MEDIC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 542 studies were screened, and 17 met the inclusion criteria. Three synthesised findings were identified: (1) Importance of pedagogical support for peer learning, (2) Mentors' support needs for mentoring in a peer learning model and (3) Characteristics of a favourable peer learning environment in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mentors perceive peer learning as beneficial for nursing students' learning. The transition from the traditional mentoring model to the peer learning model requires distinct pedagogical approaches and competences from mentors, which can be enhanced by strengthening mentors' peer-learning competence.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>It is essential to support mentors' competence in mentoring through peer learning by providing mentoring education. Learning models based on collaborative learning are beneficial for improving performance in clinical placements because they enable more nursing students to learn simultaneously in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This systematic review provides synthesised evidence of mentors' experiences in mentoring nursing students during peer learning in clinical practice. Mentors' role is to provide pedagogical support for nursing students in clinical practice conducted with peer learning. Before implementing peer learning in clinical practice, it is essential to consider the conditions for peer learning across various clinical settings and to provide support for mentors as they mentor nursing students through peer learning. These findings can support healthcare administrators, educators, mentoring education providers and mentors of peer learning in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>The protocol is registered in The Open Science Framework (OSF): 10.17605/OSF.IO/5F9HP.</p>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mentors' Experiences of Nursing Students' Peer Learning in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Sanna Kulojärvi, Sara Palander, Toni Haapa, Erika Jarva, Agostinho A C Araújo, Kristina Mikkonen, Jonna Juntunen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.70637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To synthesise the best available evidence on mentors' experiences in mentoring nursing students during peer learning clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review of qualitative studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative or mixed-methods (with a qualitative component) studies that met the inclusion criteria based on the phenomenon of interest were included. The selected studies were critically appraised using the standardised JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. Findings from qualitative research were extracted and synthesised by using the JBI meta-aggregation approach.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in September 2024 across six databases: Scopus, CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, ProQuest (Education collection) and MEDIC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 542 studies were screened, and 17 met the inclusion criteria. Three synthesised findings were identified: (1) Importance of pedagogical support for peer learning, (2) Mentors' support needs for mentoring in a peer learning model and (3) Characteristics of a favourable peer learning environment in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mentors perceive peer learning as beneficial for nursing students' learning. The transition from the traditional mentoring model to the peer learning model requires distinct pedagogical approaches and competences from mentors, which can be enhanced by strengthening mentors' peer-learning competence.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>It is essential to support mentors' competence in mentoring through peer learning by providing mentoring education. Learning models based on collaborative learning are beneficial for improving performance in clinical placements because they enable more nursing students to learn simultaneously in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This systematic review provides synthesised evidence of mentors' experiences in mentoring nursing students during peer learning in clinical practice. Mentors' role is to provide pedagogical support for nursing students in clinical practice conducted with peer learning. Before implementing peer learning in clinical practice, it is essential to consider the conditions for peer learning across various clinical settings and to provide support for mentors as they mentor nursing students through peer learning. These findings can support healthcare administrators, educators, mentoring education providers and mentors of peer learning in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>The protocol is registered in The Open Science Framework (OSF): 10.17605/OSF.IO/5F9HP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70637\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70637","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:综合现有的最佳证据,探讨导师在护理学生同侪学习临床实践中指导护理学生的经验。设计:对定性研究的系统回顾。方法:根据感兴趣的现象纳入符合纳入标准的定性或混合方法(含定性成分)研究。使用标准化的JBI关键评估清单对选定的研究进行严格评估。通过使用JBI元聚合方法提取和综合定性研究的结果。数据来源:于2024年9月在Scopus、CINAHL、Ovid MEDLINE、Web of Science、ProQuest (Education collection)和MEDIC 6个数据库中进行了全面检索。结果:共筛选542项研究,其中17项符合纳入标准。本研究确定了三个综合发现:(1)教学支持对同伴学习的重要性;(2)同伴学习模式中导师对指导的支持需求;(3)临床实践中良好同伴学习环境的特征。结论:导师认为同伴学习有利于护生学习。从传统的师徒模式向同伴学习模式的转变,需要导师具有不同的教学方法和能力,而这可以通过加强导师的同伴学习能力来提高。对专业和/或患者护理的影响:通过提供指导教育,通过同伴学习来支持导师的指导能力是至关重要的。基于协作学习的学习模式有利于提高临床实习的表现,因为它们使更多的护理学生在临床实践中同时学习。影响:本系统综述提供了临床实践中导师在指导护理学生同伴学习中的经验的综合证据。导师的作用是为护理学生在临床实践中进行同伴学习提供教学支持。在临床实践中实施同伴学习之前,必须考虑不同临床环境中同伴学习的条件,并为导师提供支持,因为他们通过同伴学习指导护理学生。这些发现可以为临床实践中的医疗管理人员、教育工作者、指导教育提供者和同伴学习导师提供支持。报告方法:本综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明。患者或公众的贡献:本研究的设计、实施或报告中没有患者或公众的参与。协议注册:协议在开放科学框架(OSF): 10.17605/OSF. io /5F9HP中注册。
Mentors' Experiences of Nursing Students' Peer Learning in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.
Aim: To synthesise the best available evidence on mentors' experiences in mentoring nursing students during peer learning clinical practice.
Design: A systematic review of qualitative studies.
Methods: Qualitative or mixed-methods (with a qualitative component) studies that met the inclusion criteria based on the phenomenon of interest were included. The selected studies were critically appraised using the standardised JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. Findings from qualitative research were extracted and synthesised by using the JBI meta-aggregation approach.
Data sources: A comprehensive search was conducted in September 2024 across six databases: Scopus, CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, ProQuest (Education collection) and MEDIC.
Results: A total of 542 studies were screened, and 17 met the inclusion criteria. Three synthesised findings were identified: (1) Importance of pedagogical support for peer learning, (2) Mentors' support needs for mentoring in a peer learning model and (3) Characteristics of a favourable peer learning environment in clinical practice.
Conclusion: Mentors perceive peer learning as beneficial for nursing students' learning. The transition from the traditional mentoring model to the peer learning model requires distinct pedagogical approaches and competences from mentors, which can be enhanced by strengthening mentors' peer-learning competence.
Implications for the profession and/or patient care: It is essential to support mentors' competence in mentoring through peer learning by providing mentoring education. Learning models based on collaborative learning are beneficial for improving performance in clinical placements because they enable more nursing students to learn simultaneously in clinical practice.
Impact: This systematic review provides synthesised evidence of mentors' experiences in mentoring nursing students during peer learning in clinical practice. Mentors' role is to provide pedagogical support for nursing students in clinical practice conducted with peer learning. Before implementing peer learning in clinical practice, it is essential to consider the conditions for peer learning across various clinical settings and to provide support for mentors as they mentor nursing students through peer learning. These findings can support healthcare administrators, educators, mentoring education providers and mentors of peer learning in clinical practice.
Reporting method: This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.
Patient or public contribution: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Protocol registration: The protocol is registered in The Open Science Framework (OSF): 10.17605/OSF.IO/5F9HP.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.