预后因素研究:为什么它在骨科中很重要以及我们如何做得更好。

IF 3.1 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Zaid A Hamoodi, Richard D Riley, Gary S Collins, Lianne Kearsley-Fleet, Jamie C Sergeant, Adam C Watts
{"title":"预后因素研究:为什么它在骨科中很重要以及我们如何做得更好。","authors":"Zaid A Hamoodi, Richard D Riley, Gary S Collins, Lianne Kearsley-Fleet, Jamie C Sergeant, Adam C Watts","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.75.BJO-2025-0385.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>By studying and predicting health outcomes, prognosis research can inform joint decision-making between a patient and clinician, and help to improve future health and care. The scope of prognosis research is broad. It can describe the natural history of a condition; identify prognostic factors (variables associated with future outcomes); develop and validate prediction models for estimating an individual's outcome risk; and identify intervention effects that vary by specified individual characteristics. Research on prognostic factors enables personalized treatment, as it helps identify patient risk profiles that guide clinical decisions, trial design, and resource allocation, and it is a stepping stone into developing prognostic models for individualized risk predictions. However, it is imperative for prognosis research to have high standards of study design, analysis, and reporting. Inadequately executed research can lead to misleading prognostic information, resulting in inappropriate treatment or advice for some patients. A better understanding of the fundamentals of modern prognosis research methods can empower clinicians to more accurately appraise research findings in this field. This will lead to the identification and implementation of high-quality prognostic research findings, to improve healthcare and patient outcomes. However, prognostic research in orthopaedics often exhibits poor methodology, inconsistent reporting, and over-reliance on statistical significance. Recent advances in methodological guidance have provided important recommendations for study design, analysis, and reporting. Accurate interpretation requires adjusted analyses that consider known prognostic factors to prevent misleading conclusions. Key components include study registration, sample size planning, clear protocols and transparent reporting. Following these principles can greatly enhance the quality and clinical relevance of trauma and orthopaedic research. This overview introduces types of prognosis studies and then focuses on prognostic factor research and its importance within the field of Trauma and Orthopaedics (T&O). It outlines the latest advances, identifies current limitations, and directs readers towards best practices that should be adopted by researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"7 5","pages":"613-618"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13150463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic factor research: why it matters in orthopaedics and how we do it better.\",\"authors\":\"Zaid A Hamoodi, Richard D Riley, Gary S Collins, Lianne Kearsley-Fleet, Jamie C Sergeant, Adam C Watts\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.75.BJO-2025-0385.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>By studying and predicting health outcomes, prognosis research can inform joint decision-making between a patient and clinician, and help to improve future health and care. The scope of prognosis research is broad. It can describe the natural history of a condition; identify prognostic factors (variables associated with future outcomes); develop and validate prediction models for estimating an individual's outcome risk; and identify intervention effects that vary by specified individual characteristics. Research on prognostic factors enables personalized treatment, as it helps identify patient risk profiles that guide clinical decisions, trial design, and resource allocation, and it is a stepping stone into developing prognostic models for individualized risk predictions. However, it is imperative for prognosis research to have high standards of study design, analysis, and reporting. Inadequately executed research can lead to misleading prognostic information, resulting in inappropriate treatment or advice for some patients. A better understanding of the fundamentals of modern prognosis research methods can empower clinicians to more accurately appraise research findings in this field. This will lead to the identification and implementation of high-quality prognostic research findings, to improve healthcare and patient outcomes. However, prognostic research in orthopaedics often exhibits poor methodology, inconsistent reporting, and over-reliance on statistical significance. Recent advances in methodological guidance have provided important recommendations for study design, analysis, and reporting. Accurate interpretation requires adjusted analyses that consider known prognostic factors to prevent misleading conclusions. Key components include study registration, sample size planning, clear protocols and transparent reporting. Following these principles can greatly enhance the quality and clinical relevance of trauma and orthopaedic research. This overview introduces types of prognosis studies and then focuses on prognostic factor research and its importance within the field of Trauma and Orthopaedics (T&O). It outlines the latest advances, identifies current limitations, and directs readers towards best practices that should be adopted by researchers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"613-618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13150463/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.75.BJO-2025-0385.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.75.BJO-2025-0385.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过研究和预测健康结果,预后研究可以为患者和临床医生之间的联合决策提供信息,并有助于改善未来的健康和护理。预后研究的范围是广泛的。它可以描述一种疾病的自然历史;确定预后因素(与未来结果相关的变量);开发和验证预测模型,以估计个人的结果风险;并确定干预效果因特定的个体特征而异。对预后因素的研究可以实现个性化治疗,因为它有助于确定指导临床决策、试验设计和资源分配的患者风险概况,并且是开发个性化风险预测的预后模型的垫脚石。然而,预后研究必须有高标准的研究设计、分析和报告。执行不充分的研究可能导致误导性的预后信息,导致对一些患者不适当的治疗或建议。更好地了解现代预后研究方法的基本原理可以使临床医生更准确地评估该领域的研究成果。这将导致识别和实施高质量的预后研究结果,以改善医疗保健和患者的结果。然而,骨科预后研究经常表现出方法不佳、报告不一致和过度依赖统计显著性。方法学指导的最新进展为研究设计、分析和报告提供了重要的建议。准确的解释需要调整分析,考虑已知的预后因素,以防止误导性的结论。关键组成部分包括研究注册、样本量计划、明确的协议和透明的报告。遵循这些原则可以大大提高创伤和骨科研究的质量和临床相关性。本文概述了预后研究的类型,然后重点介绍了预后因素研究及其在创伤与骨科(T&O)领域的重要性。它概述了最新的进展,确定了当前的局限性,并指导读者了解研究人员应该采用的最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic factor research: why it matters in orthopaedics and how we do it better.

By studying and predicting health outcomes, prognosis research can inform joint decision-making between a patient and clinician, and help to improve future health and care. The scope of prognosis research is broad. It can describe the natural history of a condition; identify prognostic factors (variables associated with future outcomes); develop and validate prediction models for estimating an individual's outcome risk; and identify intervention effects that vary by specified individual characteristics. Research on prognostic factors enables personalized treatment, as it helps identify patient risk profiles that guide clinical decisions, trial design, and resource allocation, and it is a stepping stone into developing prognostic models for individualized risk predictions. However, it is imperative for prognosis research to have high standards of study design, analysis, and reporting. Inadequately executed research can lead to misleading prognostic information, resulting in inappropriate treatment or advice for some patients. A better understanding of the fundamentals of modern prognosis research methods can empower clinicians to more accurately appraise research findings in this field. This will lead to the identification and implementation of high-quality prognostic research findings, to improve healthcare and patient outcomes. However, prognostic research in orthopaedics often exhibits poor methodology, inconsistent reporting, and over-reliance on statistical significance. Recent advances in methodological guidance have provided important recommendations for study design, analysis, and reporting. Accurate interpretation requires adjusted analyses that consider known prognostic factors to prevent misleading conclusions. Key components include study registration, sample size planning, clear protocols and transparent reporting. Following these principles can greatly enhance the quality and clinical relevance of trauma and orthopaedic research. This overview introduces types of prognosis studies and then focuses on prognostic factor research and its importance within the field of Trauma and Orthopaedics (T&O). It outlines the latest advances, identifies current limitations, and directs readers towards best practices that should be adopted by researchers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书