J Patrick Park, Kevin Yan Zhao, Tanya Cierson, Bardia Barimani, Eric Belzile, De Q Tran, Anthony Albers
{"title":"全髋关节置换术后疼痛控制:一项前瞻性随机对照试验,比较无辅助物的脊髓麻醉、髂筋膜阻滞、囊周神经群阻滞和局部麻醉浸润。","authors":"J Patrick Park, Kevin Yan Zhao, Tanya Cierson, Bardia Barimani, Eric Belzile, De Q Tran, Anthony Albers","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.75.BJO-2026-0003.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Postoperative pain management for total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains an area for improvement. This study compared the impact of suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (FIB) versus local anaesthetic infiltration (LAI), versus pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, and versus spinal anaesthesia alone, on early postoperative pain in patients who underwent inpatient primary THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre, assessor- and participant-blinded randomized controlled trial. A total of 240 patients undergoing THA under spinal anaesthesia were randomized to LAI, FIB, PENG block, or control in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was pain at four hours postoperatively (visual analogue scale (VAS)). Secondary outcomes included VAS at other timepoints, opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, and length of hospital stay (LOS). A VAS difference of 2 cm was considered clinically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 participants were randomized, with 222 in the final analysis. Only LAI (mean VAS 1.6 (SD 2.2)) significantly decreased postoperative pain compared with the control group (mean VAS 3.0 (SD 2.7); p = 0.004) at four hours. VAS at four hours was not significantly different between LAI, FIB, and PENG block groups in direct comparisons. FIB (23.3 mg morphine equivalents (MEQ) (SD 18.4), p = 0.001) and LAI (22.2 mg MEQ (SD 18.7), p = 0.001) significantly decreased opioid consumption compared with the control group (36.7 mg MEQ (SD 24.5)) at 24 hours postoperatively. The same was found at 48 hours postoperatively. LAI significantly improved patient satisfaction scores at four hours compared with the control group (1.3 (SD 0.6) vs 1.9 (SD 1.2), p = 0.043). There was no difference in LOS between study groups. One patient had femoral nerve motor deficit following PENG block, with full recovery at six months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LAI combined with spinal anaesthesia reduced early postoperative pain and improved patient satisfaction with pain control compared with spinal anaesthesia alone. LAI and FIB both decreased opioid consumption in the first 24 and 48 hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"7 5","pages":"601-612"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13150464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain control following total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing spinal anaesthesia without adjuncts versus fascia iliaca block versus pericapsular nerve group block versus local anaesthetic infiltration.\",\"authors\":\"J Patrick Park, Kevin Yan Zhao, Tanya Cierson, Bardia Barimani, Eric Belzile, De Q Tran, Anthony Albers\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.75.BJO-2026-0003.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Postoperative pain management for total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains an area for improvement. This study compared the impact of suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (FIB) versus local anaesthetic infiltration (LAI), versus pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, and versus spinal anaesthesia alone, on early postoperative pain in patients who underwent inpatient primary THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre, assessor- and participant-blinded randomized controlled trial. A total of 240 patients undergoing THA under spinal anaesthesia were randomized to LAI, FIB, PENG block, or control in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was pain at four hours postoperatively (visual analogue scale (VAS)). Secondary outcomes included VAS at other timepoints, opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, and length of hospital stay (LOS). A VAS difference of 2 cm was considered clinically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 participants were randomized, with 222 in the final analysis. Only LAI (mean VAS 1.6 (SD 2.2)) significantly decreased postoperative pain compared with the control group (mean VAS 3.0 (SD 2.7); p = 0.004) at four hours. VAS at four hours was not significantly different between LAI, FIB, and PENG block groups in direct comparisons. FIB (23.3 mg morphine equivalents (MEQ) (SD 18.4), p = 0.001) and LAI (22.2 mg MEQ (SD 18.7), p = 0.001) significantly decreased opioid consumption compared with the control group (36.7 mg MEQ (SD 24.5)) at 24 hours postoperatively. The same was found at 48 hours postoperatively. LAI significantly improved patient satisfaction scores at four hours compared with the control group (1.3 (SD 0.6) vs 1.9 (SD 1.2), p = 0.043). There was no difference in LOS between study groups. One patient had femoral nerve motor deficit following PENG block, with full recovery at six months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LAI combined with spinal anaesthesia reduced early postoperative pain and improved patient satisfaction with pain control compared with spinal anaesthesia alone. LAI and FIB both decreased opioid consumption in the first 24 and 48 hours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"601-612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13150464/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.75.BJO-2026-0003.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.75.BJO-2026-0003.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:全髋关节置换术(THA)术后疼痛管理仍是一个有待改进的领域。本研究比较了腹股沟上髂筋膜阻滞(FIB)与局部麻醉浸润(LAI)、与包膜神经阻滞(PENG)以及单独脊髓麻醉对住院原发性THA患者术后早期疼痛的影响。方法:这是一项单中心、评估者和参与者双盲的随机对照试验。240例脊柱麻醉下行THA的患者按1:1:1:1的比例随机分为LAI、FIB、PENG阻滞或对照组。主要结果为术后4小时疼痛(视觉模拟评分(VAS))。次要结局包括其他时间点的VAS、阿片类药物消耗、患者满意度和住院时间(LOS)。VAS差异2 cm被认为具有临床意义。结果:共纳入受试者240人,最终分析222人。与对照组(平均VAS 3.0 (SD 2.7))相比,只有LAI(平均VAS 1.6 (SD 2.2))显著降低了术后疼痛;P = 0.004)。在直接比较中,LAI、FIB和PENG阻滞组4小时VAS无显著差异。FIB (23.3 mg吗啡当量(MEQ) (SD 18.4), p = 0.001)和LAI (22.2 mg MEQ (SD 18.7), p = 0.001)与对照组(36.7 mg MEQ (SD 24.5))相比,术后24小时阿片类药物消耗显著减少。术后48小时也有相同的发现。与对照组相比,LAI显著提高了4小时患者满意度评分(1.3 (SD 0.6) vs 1.9 (SD 1.2), p = 0.043)。研究小组之间的LOS没有差异。1例患者在PENG阻滞后出现股神经运动障碍,术后6个月完全恢复。结论:与单用脊髓麻醉相比,LAI联合脊髓麻醉可减轻术后早期疼痛,提高患者对疼痛控制的满意度。LAI和FIB在前24小时和48小时内都减少了阿片类药物的消耗。
Pain control following total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing spinal anaesthesia without adjuncts versus fascia iliaca block versus pericapsular nerve group block versus local anaesthetic infiltration.
Aims: Postoperative pain management for total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains an area for improvement. This study compared the impact of suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (FIB) versus local anaesthetic infiltration (LAI), versus pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, and versus spinal anaesthesia alone, on early postoperative pain in patients who underwent inpatient primary THA.
Methods: This was a single-centre, assessor- and participant-blinded randomized controlled trial. A total of 240 patients undergoing THA under spinal anaesthesia were randomized to LAI, FIB, PENG block, or control in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was pain at four hours postoperatively (visual analogue scale (VAS)). Secondary outcomes included VAS at other timepoints, opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, and length of hospital stay (LOS). A VAS difference of 2 cm was considered clinically significant.
Results: A total of 240 participants were randomized, with 222 in the final analysis. Only LAI (mean VAS 1.6 (SD 2.2)) significantly decreased postoperative pain compared with the control group (mean VAS 3.0 (SD 2.7); p = 0.004) at four hours. VAS at four hours was not significantly different between LAI, FIB, and PENG block groups in direct comparisons. FIB (23.3 mg morphine equivalents (MEQ) (SD 18.4), p = 0.001) and LAI (22.2 mg MEQ (SD 18.7), p = 0.001) significantly decreased opioid consumption compared with the control group (36.7 mg MEQ (SD 24.5)) at 24 hours postoperatively. The same was found at 48 hours postoperatively. LAI significantly improved patient satisfaction scores at four hours compared with the control group (1.3 (SD 0.6) vs 1.9 (SD 1.2), p = 0.043). There was no difference in LOS between study groups. One patient had femoral nerve motor deficit following PENG block, with full recovery at six months postoperatively.
Conclusion: LAI combined with spinal anaesthesia reduced early postoperative pain and improved patient satisfaction with pain control compared with spinal anaesthesia alone. LAI and FIB both decreased opioid consumption in the first 24 and 48 hours.