老年人身体活动和认知训练的随机对照试验:PhABHeaD研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2026-05-07 DOI:10.1186/s13063-026-09681-9
Nicolas Cherbuin, Joseph M Northey, Erin I Walsh, Richard A Burns, Hollie Speer, Nicholas Lawlis, Tergel Namsrai, Amanda Scott, Vicki McCarthy, Jo Lane, Jeroen J A van Boxtel, Amit Lampit, Anne Brüstle, Ben Rattray
{"title":"老年人身体活动和认知训练的随机对照试验:PhABHeaD研究。","authors":"Nicolas Cherbuin, Joseph M Northey, Erin I Walsh, Richard A Burns, Hollie Speer, Nicholas Lawlis, Tergel Namsrai, Amanda Scott, Vicki McCarthy, Jo Lane, Jeroen J A van Boxtel, Amit Lampit, Anne Brüstle, Ben Rattray","doi":"10.1186/s13063-026-09681-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robust empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of physical and cognitive training in preventing and delaying cognitive decline. Emerging research suggests distinct neurobiological mechanisms underpin the effects of these different training modalities. An unresolved question is whether the mechanisms through which these training modalities impart their effect interact synergistically to improve cognitive outcomes, rather than exerting additive effects, differ. In addition, past research has been inconsistent in adequately controlling for or documenting the dosage of physical and/or cognitive training. Consequently, the aim of this study is to assess the relative effectiveness of physical and cognitive training conducted in isolation or concurrently, whilst rigorously controlling and documenting the treatment parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a three-arm randomised controlled trial conducted over a 3-month period, comparing cognitive training, physical activity, and a combination of both interventions. Older cognitively healthy participants (n = 126) aged 60-75 years will be recruited from the community. The physical only training will require participants to cycle on a cycle ergometer at above 60% of their age-predicted heart rate maximum for 50 min with a 3-min warm-up and cool-down period. The cognitive only training will require participants to complete up to five different cognitive tasks selected from a set of eight on the BrainHQ platform during each 50-min training session. The concurrent cognitive and physical training will require participants to undertake both treatments at the same time. Primary outcomes, assessed pre- and post- intervention, will include speed of processing and episodic memory assessed with the NIH Toolbox, as well as general driving skills assessed on a driving simulator.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings will inform the design of interventions and population health advice aimed at mitigating cognitive decline. If a substantial synergetic effect is detected, it may lead to the use of more widespread concurrent physical and cognitive training and the potential development of methods to make concurrent training practical. Findings will also provide important clarification as to the relative benefit of the two modes of training.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospective registration with Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12624001088538) on 10th September 2024 and World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry (U1111-1280-3851).</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomised controlled trial of physical activity and cognitive training in older adults: the PhABHeaD study.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Cherbuin, Joseph M Northey, Erin I Walsh, Richard A Burns, Hollie Speer, Nicholas Lawlis, Tergel Namsrai, Amanda Scott, Vicki McCarthy, Jo Lane, Jeroen J A van Boxtel, Amit Lampit, Anne Brüstle, Ben Rattray\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-026-09681-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robust empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of physical and cognitive training in preventing and delaying cognitive decline. Emerging research suggests distinct neurobiological mechanisms underpin the effects of these different training modalities. An unresolved question is whether the mechanisms through which these training modalities impart their effect interact synergistically to improve cognitive outcomes, rather than exerting additive effects, differ. In addition, past research has been inconsistent in adequately controlling for or documenting the dosage of physical and/or cognitive training. Consequently, the aim of this study is to assess the relative effectiveness of physical and cognitive training conducted in isolation or concurrently, whilst rigorously controlling and documenting the treatment parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a three-arm randomised controlled trial conducted over a 3-month period, comparing cognitive training, physical activity, and a combination of both interventions. Older cognitively healthy participants (n = 126) aged 60-75 years will be recruited from the community. The physical only training will require participants to cycle on a cycle ergometer at above 60% of their age-predicted heart rate maximum for 50 min with a 3-min warm-up and cool-down period. The cognitive only training will require participants to complete up to five different cognitive tasks selected from a set of eight on the BrainHQ platform during each 50-min training session. The concurrent cognitive and physical training will require participants to undertake both treatments at the same time. Primary outcomes, assessed pre- and post- intervention, will include speed of processing and episodic memory assessed with the NIH Toolbox, as well as general driving skills assessed on a driving simulator.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings will inform the design of interventions and population health advice aimed at mitigating cognitive decline. If a substantial synergetic effect is detected, it may lead to the use of more widespread concurrent physical and cognitive training and the potential development of methods to make concurrent training practical. Findings will also provide important clarification as to the relative benefit of the two modes of training.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospective registration with Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12624001088538) on 10th September 2024 and World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry (U1111-1280-3851).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-09681-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-09681-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:强有力的经验证据支持体育和认知训练在预防和延缓认知能力下降方面的有效性。新兴研究表明,不同的神经生物学机制支撑着这些不同训练方式的效果。一个尚未解决的问题是,这些训练方式的作用机制是否相互作用,协同提高认知结果,而不是发挥叠加效应,存在差异。此外,过去的研究在充分控制或记录身体和/或认知训练的剂量方面并不一致。因此,本研究的目的是评估单独或同时进行的身体和认知训练的相对有效性,同时严格控制和记录治疗参数。方法:本研究是一项为期3个月的三组随机对照试验,比较了认知训练、体育活动和两种干预措施的组合。从社区招募60-75岁认知健康的老年参与者(n = 126)。体能训练将要求参与者以超过其年龄预测心率60%的最高速度在自行车计力器上骑行50分钟,并进行3分钟的热身和冷却时间。在每次50分钟的训练中,认知训练将要求参与者在BrainHQ平台上从8个不同的认知任务中选择完成多达5个不同的认知任务。同时进行的认知和体能训练将要求参与者同时进行两种治疗。干预前后评估的主要结果将包括用NIH工具箱评估的处理速度和情景记忆,以及在驾驶模拟器上评估的一般驾驶技能。讨论:研究结果将为旨在减轻认知能力下降的干预措施和人口健康建议的设计提供信息。如果检测到实质性的协同效应,可能会导致更广泛地使用同时进行的身体和认知训练,并有可能开发出使同时进行的训练可行的方法。调查结果也将对两种训练模式的相对益处提供重要的澄清。试验注册:于2024年9月10日在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12624001088538)和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册中心(U1111-1280-3851)进行前瞻性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A randomised controlled trial of physical activity and cognitive training in older adults: the PhABHeaD study.

Background: Robust empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of physical and cognitive training in preventing and delaying cognitive decline. Emerging research suggests distinct neurobiological mechanisms underpin the effects of these different training modalities. An unresolved question is whether the mechanisms through which these training modalities impart their effect interact synergistically to improve cognitive outcomes, rather than exerting additive effects, differ. In addition, past research has been inconsistent in adequately controlling for or documenting the dosage of physical and/or cognitive training. Consequently, the aim of this study is to assess the relative effectiveness of physical and cognitive training conducted in isolation or concurrently, whilst rigorously controlling and documenting the treatment parameters.

Methods: This study is a three-arm randomised controlled trial conducted over a 3-month period, comparing cognitive training, physical activity, and a combination of both interventions. Older cognitively healthy participants (n = 126) aged 60-75 years will be recruited from the community. The physical only training will require participants to cycle on a cycle ergometer at above 60% of their age-predicted heart rate maximum for 50 min with a 3-min warm-up and cool-down period. The cognitive only training will require participants to complete up to five different cognitive tasks selected from a set of eight on the BrainHQ platform during each 50-min training session. The concurrent cognitive and physical training will require participants to undertake both treatments at the same time. Primary outcomes, assessed pre- and post- intervention, will include speed of processing and episodic memory assessed with the NIH Toolbox, as well as general driving skills assessed on a driving simulator.

Discussion: Findings will inform the design of interventions and population health advice aimed at mitigating cognitive decline. If a substantial synergetic effect is detected, it may lead to the use of more widespread concurrent physical and cognitive training and the potential development of methods to make concurrent training practical. Findings will also provide important clarification as to the relative benefit of the two modes of training.

Trial registration: Prospective registration with Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12624001088538) on 10th September 2024 and World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry (U1111-1280-3851).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书