超越再分析:实体肿瘤蛋白质组学数据重用的关键问题。

IF 3.6 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Federica Franzetti, Nicole Giugni, Manuel Airoldi, Heather Bondi, Tiziana Alberio, Mauro Fasano
{"title":"超越再分析:实体肿瘤蛋白质组学数据重用的关键问题。","authors":"Federica Franzetti, Nicole Giugni, Manuel Airoldi, Heather Bondi, Tiziana Alberio, Mauro Fasano","doi":"10.3390/proteomes14020016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proteomics represents a fundamental layer for understanding the molecular complexity of solid tumors by quantifying protein abundance and capturing proteoforms and post-translational modifications undetected in genomics or transcriptomics analyses. As mass spectrometry-based technologies and public proteomics repositories have expanded, opportunities for large-scale data reuse have grown accordingly. Nevertheless, data availability has not been translated into straightforward reuse: differences in experimental design, acquisition strategies, quantification workflows and metadata quality still limit the reproducibility and cross-study comparability. In this review, proteomics data reuse is defined as the systematic reanalysis and integration of publicly available datasets to support precision oncology applications such as biomarker assessment and antibody-drug conjugate target prioritization. We discuss reuse as an end-to-end analytical process, focusing on data analysis workflows, harmonization strategies, and the impact of heterogeneous experimental and analytical choices on interoperability. The increased application of artificial intelligence in proteomics data integration and reuse is also addressed, highlighting its analytical potential while underscoring the risks of overinterpretation when biological context and data structure are not adequately considered. Using colorectal and prostate cancer as representative examples, we illustrate how proteomics data reuse can support biological discovery and translational research, while critically examining the factors that limit robustness and clinical relevance.</p>","PeriodicalId":20877,"journal":{"name":"Proteomes","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13108149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Reanalysis: Critical Issues in Data Reuse for Solid Tumor Proteomics.\",\"authors\":\"Federica Franzetti, Nicole Giugni, Manuel Airoldi, Heather Bondi, Tiziana Alberio, Mauro Fasano\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/proteomes14020016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Proteomics represents a fundamental layer for understanding the molecular complexity of solid tumors by quantifying protein abundance and capturing proteoforms and post-translational modifications undetected in genomics or transcriptomics analyses. As mass spectrometry-based technologies and public proteomics repositories have expanded, opportunities for large-scale data reuse have grown accordingly. Nevertheless, data availability has not been translated into straightforward reuse: differences in experimental design, acquisition strategies, quantification workflows and metadata quality still limit the reproducibility and cross-study comparability. In this review, proteomics data reuse is defined as the systematic reanalysis and integration of publicly available datasets to support precision oncology applications such as biomarker assessment and antibody-drug conjugate target prioritization. We discuss reuse as an end-to-end analytical process, focusing on data analysis workflows, harmonization strategies, and the impact of heterogeneous experimental and analytical choices on interoperability. The increased application of artificial intelligence in proteomics data integration and reuse is also addressed, highlighting its analytical potential while underscoring the risks of overinterpretation when biological context and data structure are not adequately considered. Using colorectal and prostate cancer as representative examples, we illustrate how proteomics data reuse can support biological discovery and translational research, while critically examining the factors that limit robustness and clinical relevance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proteomes\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13108149/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proteomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes14020016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes14020016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蛋白质组学通过量化蛋白质丰度和捕获基因组学或转录组学分析中未检测到的蛋白质形态和翻译后修饰,代表了理解实体肿瘤分子复杂性的基础。随着基于质谱的技术和公共蛋白质组学存储库的扩展,大规模数据重用的机会也相应增加。然而,数据的可用性并没有转化为直接的重用:实验设计、获取策略、量化工作流程和元数据质量的差异仍然限制了再现性和交叉研究的可比性。在这篇综述中,蛋白质组学数据重用被定义为系统地重新分析和整合公开可用的数据集,以支持精确的肿瘤学应用,如生物标志物评估和抗体-药物偶联靶点优先排序。我们将重用作为端到端分析过程进行讨论,重点关注数据分析工作流、协调策略以及异构实验和分析选择对互操作性的影响。还讨论了人工智能在蛋白质组学数据集成和重用中的应用,强调了其分析潜力,同时强调了在未充分考虑生物背景和数据结构时过度解释的风险。以结直肠癌和前列腺癌为例,我们说明了蛋白质组学数据重用如何支持生物学发现和转化研究,同时严格检查限制稳健性和临床相关性的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond Reanalysis: Critical Issues in Data Reuse for Solid Tumor Proteomics.

Proteomics represents a fundamental layer for understanding the molecular complexity of solid tumors by quantifying protein abundance and capturing proteoforms and post-translational modifications undetected in genomics or transcriptomics analyses. As mass spectrometry-based technologies and public proteomics repositories have expanded, opportunities for large-scale data reuse have grown accordingly. Nevertheless, data availability has not been translated into straightforward reuse: differences in experimental design, acquisition strategies, quantification workflows and metadata quality still limit the reproducibility and cross-study comparability. In this review, proteomics data reuse is defined as the systematic reanalysis and integration of publicly available datasets to support precision oncology applications such as biomarker assessment and antibody-drug conjugate target prioritization. We discuss reuse as an end-to-end analytical process, focusing on data analysis workflows, harmonization strategies, and the impact of heterogeneous experimental and analytical choices on interoperability. The increased application of artificial intelligence in proteomics data integration and reuse is also addressed, highlighting its analytical potential while underscoring the risks of overinterpretation when biological context and data structure are not adequately considered. Using colorectal and prostate cancer as representative examples, we illustrate how proteomics data reuse can support biological discovery and translational research, while critically examining the factors that limit robustness and clinical relevance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proteomes
Proteomes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Proteomes (ISSN 2227-7382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of proteome science. Proteomes covers the multi-disciplinary topics of structural and functional biology, protein chemistry, cell biology, methodology used for protein analysis, including mass spectrometry, protein arrays, bioinformatics, HTS assays, etc. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers. Scope: -whole proteome analysis of any organism -disease/pharmaceutical studies -comparative proteomics -protein-ligand/protein interactions -structure/functional proteomics -gene expression -methodology -bioinformatics -applications of proteomics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书