基于深度学习的自动肩关节分割,用于确定Hill-Sachs损伤是在轨道上还是在轨道上。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2026-04-22 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671261436434
Fangzheng Zhou, Yaohui Yang, Zhiyao Zhao, Hairui Zhang, Xiaoning Liu
{"title":"基于深度学习的自动肩关节分割,用于确定Hill-Sachs损伤是在轨道上还是在轨道上。","authors":"Fangzheng Zhou, Yaohui Yang, Zhiyao Zhao, Hairui Zhang, Xiaoning Liu","doi":"10.1177/23259671261436434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate quantification of the glenoid track is critical for determining optimal treatment strategies in patients with anterior shoulder instability. However, conventional computed tomography (CT)-based assessment methods require approximately 2 hours of manual segmentation and suffer from limited interobserver consistency, which may compromise diagnostic accuracy and surgical planning. Deep learning has demonstrated significant potential in medical image analysis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To propose a deep learning-based framework for automated CT segmentation and bone defect quantification in anterior shoulder dislocation to enhance diagnostic efficiency and consistency.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort Study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A deep learning model was developed by adapting the TotalSegmentator framework to perform automated segmentation and 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of CT images from 43 patients with anterior shoulder dislocation. Glenoid track width (GTW) and Hill-Sachs interval (HSI) were manually assessed using the Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique by 1 senior shoulder and elbow surgeon and 2 junior physicians. Semi-automated determination of the on-track/off-track status was also performed. Segmentation performance and measurement method reliability were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model achieved excellent segmentation accuracy, with mean Dice similarity coefficients exceeding 0.95 for both the scapula and humerus. Segmentation time was significantly reduced compared with manual segmentation, requiring only 30 seconds per case. Based on the segmented images, the GTW measured using the Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique demonstrated almost perfect intra- and interobserver agreement (ICC > 0.90). HSI measurements showed almost perfect intraobserver reliability (ICC > 0.90) and substantial interobserver agreement (ICC ≥ 0.80). The semi-automated determination of on-track/off-track status improved workflow efficiency, saving approximately 2 hours compared with the fully manual approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study integrates deep learning techniques into the entire diagnostic workflow for shoulder dislocation, enabling rapid, accurate quantification of bony defects. The reliability of using the Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique for measuring glenoid parameters on 3D models was validated, offering an efficient tool for surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"14 4","pages":"23259671261436434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13111818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning-Based Automatic Glenohumeral Joint Segmentation for Determining Whether the Hill-Sachs Lesion Is On-Track or Off-Track.\",\"authors\":\"Fangzheng Zhou, Yaohui Yang, Zhiyao Zhao, Hairui Zhang, Xiaoning Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23259671261436434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate quantification of the glenoid track is critical for determining optimal treatment strategies in patients with anterior shoulder instability. However, conventional computed tomography (CT)-based assessment methods require approximately 2 hours of manual segmentation and suffer from limited interobserver consistency, which may compromise diagnostic accuracy and surgical planning. Deep learning has demonstrated significant potential in medical image analysis.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To propose a deep learning-based framework for automated CT segmentation and bone defect quantification in anterior shoulder dislocation to enhance diagnostic efficiency and consistency.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort Study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A deep learning model was developed by adapting the TotalSegmentator framework to perform automated segmentation and 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of CT images from 43 patients with anterior shoulder dislocation. Glenoid track width (GTW) and Hill-Sachs interval (HSI) were manually assessed using the Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique by 1 senior shoulder and elbow surgeon and 2 junior physicians. Semi-automated determination of the on-track/off-track status was also performed. Segmentation performance and measurement method reliability were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model achieved excellent segmentation accuracy, with mean Dice similarity coefficients exceeding 0.95 for both the scapula and humerus. Segmentation time was significantly reduced compared with manual segmentation, requiring only 30 seconds per case. Based on the segmented images, the GTW measured using the Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique demonstrated almost perfect intra- and interobserver agreement (ICC > 0.90). HSI measurements showed almost perfect intraobserver reliability (ICC > 0.90) and substantial interobserver agreement (ICC ≥ 0.80). The semi-automated determination of on-track/off-track status improved workflow efficiency, saving approximately 2 hours compared with the fully manual approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study integrates deep learning techniques into the entire diagnostic workflow for shoulder dislocation, enabling rapid, accurate quantification of bony defects. The reliability of using the Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique for measuring glenoid parameters on 3D models was validated, offering an efficient tool for surgical planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"23259671261436434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13111818/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671261436434\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671261436434","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:准确量化肩关节轨迹对于确定前路肩关节不稳患者的最佳治疗策略至关重要。然而,传统的基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的评估方法需要大约2小时的人工分割,并且观察者之间的一致性有限,这可能会影响诊断的准确性和手术计划。深度学习在医学图像分析中显示出巨大的潜力。目的:提出一种基于深度学习的肩前脱位CT自动分割和骨缺损量化框架,以提高诊断效率和一致性。研究设计:队列研究(诊断);证据水平,3。方法:采用TotalSegmentator框架建立深度学习模型,对43例肩关节前脱位患者的CT图像进行自动分割和三维重建。1名高级肩关节外科医生和2名初级医生使用三分之二肩关节高度技术手动评估关节臼轨迹宽度(GTW)和Hill-Sachs间隙(HSI)。还进行了半自动化的轨道/脱轨状态测定。分别用Dice相似系数和类内相关系数(intracclass correlation coefficient, ICC)评价了分割效果和测量方法的可靠性。结果:该模型具有较好的分割精度,肩胛骨和肱骨的平均Dice相似系数均超过0.95。与人工分割相比,分割时间大大缩短,每个案例只需要30秒。基于分割图像,使用三分之二关节盂高度技术测量的GTW显示了几乎完美的观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性(ICC > 0.90)。HSI测量显示几乎完美的观察者内信度(ICC > 0.90)和大量的观察者间一致性(ICC≥0.80)。半自动化的轨道/轨道状态确定提高了工作流程效率,与全手动方法相比节省了大约2小时。结论:本研究将深度学习技术整合到肩关节脱位的整个诊断流程中,能够快速、准确地量化骨缺损。使用三分之二关节盂高度技术在三维模型上测量关节盂参数的可靠性得到验证,为手术计划提供了有效的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Learning-Based Automatic Glenohumeral Joint Segmentation for Determining Whether the Hill-Sachs Lesion Is On-Track or Off-Track.

Background: Accurate quantification of the glenoid track is critical for determining optimal treatment strategies in patients with anterior shoulder instability. However, conventional computed tomography (CT)-based assessment methods require approximately 2 hours of manual segmentation and suffer from limited interobserver consistency, which may compromise diagnostic accuracy and surgical planning. Deep learning has demonstrated significant potential in medical image analysis.

Purpose: To propose a deep learning-based framework for automated CT segmentation and bone defect quantification in anterior shoulder dislocation to enhance diagnostic efficiency and consistency.

Study design: Cohort Study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: A deep learning model was developed by adapting the TotalSegmentator framework to perform automated segmentation and 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of CT images from 43 patients with anterior shoulder dislocation. Glenoid track width (GTW) and Hill-Sachs interval (HSI) were manually assessed using the Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique by 1 senior shoulder and elbow surgeon and 2 junior physicians. Semi-automated determination of the on-track/off-track status was also performed. Segmentation performance and measurement method reliability were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively.

Results: The model achieved excellent segmentation accuracy, with mean Dice similarity coefficients exceeding 0.95 for both the scapula and humerus. Segmentation time was significantly reduced compared with manual segmentation, requiring only 30 seconds per case. Based on the segmented images, the GTW measured using the Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique demonstrated almost perfect intra- and interobserver agreement (ICC > 0.90). HSI measurements showed almost perfect intraobserver reliability (ICC > 0.90) and substantial interobserver agreement (ICC ≥ 0.80). The semi-automated determination of on-track/off-track status improved workflow efficiency, saving approximately 2 hours compared with the fully manual approach.

Conclusion: This study integrates deep learning techniques into the entire diagnostic workflow for shoulder dislocation, enabling rapid, accurate quantification of bony defects. The reliability of using the Two-Thirds Glenoid Height Technique for measuring glenoid parameters on 3D models was validated, offering an efficient tool for surgical planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书