可持续转型中的紧急锁定:能源系统分散化的例子

IF 5.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy, Sustainability and Society Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-13 DOI:10.1186/s13705-026-00574-y
D. Bauknecht, S. Bolwig, K. Kubeczko, S. Olbrich, H. Rohracher, A. J. Wieczorek
{"title":"可持续转型中的紧急锁定:能源系统分散化的例子","authors":"D. Bauknecht,&nbsp;S. Bolwig,&nbsp;K. Kubeczko,&nbsp;S. Olbrich,&nbsp;H. Rohracher,&nbsp;A. J. Wieczorek","doi":"10.1186/s13705-026-00574-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Energy systems are currently undergoing fundamental transformations, with several possible energy futures emerging, including various decentralised ones. However, transformations are characterised by uncertainty, and it is difficult to assess the sustainability of these different energy futures. There is a danger that premature choices could lead to lock-ins to sub-optimal pathways as seen from a broad sustainability perspective. This paper explores the role of potential lock-ins on the pathways towards emerging configurations of decentralised, carbon-neutral energy systems. Our analysis draws on four emerging ideal-type decentralisation configurations of ‘energy futures’ (individual system optimisation, individual autonomy, collective system optimisation, and collective autonomy) and the institutional, actor and technological preconditions required for them to become dominant forms of energy system organisation.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>We developed a forward-looking, ex-ante approach to identify emergent lock-ins that may be created along the transition pathways.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These new lock-ins have implications for the sustainability of decentralised energy futures and how such sustainability should be assessed. Such an analysis can inform sustainable energy policies, helping to keep different options open and to avoid a premature lock-in to potentially sub-optimal socio-technical energy configurations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":539,"journal":{"name":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13705-026-00574-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergent lock-ins in sustainability transitions: the example of energy system decentralisation\",\"authors\":\"D. Bauknecht,&nbsp;S. Bolwig,&nbsp;K. Kubeczko,&nbsp;S. Olbrich,&nbsp;H. Rohracher,&nbsp;A. J. Wieczorek\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13705-026-00574-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Energy systems are currently undergoing fundamental transformations, with several possible energy futures emerging, including various decentralised ones. However, transformations are characterised by uncertainty, and it is difficult to assess the sustainability of these different energy futures. There is a danger that premature choices could lead to lock-ins to sub-optimal pathways as seen from a broad sustainability perspective. This paper explores the role of potential lock-ins on the pathways towards emerging configurations of decentralised, carbon-neutral energy systems. Our analysis draws on four emerging ideal-type decentralisation configurations of ‘energy futures’ (individual system optimisation, individual autonomy, collective system optimisation, and collective autonomy) and the institutional, actor and technological preconditions required for them to become dominant forms of energy system organisation.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>We developed a forward-looking, ex-ante approach to identify emergent lock-ins that may be created along the transition pathways.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These new lock-ins have implications for the sustainability of decentralised energy futures and how such sustainability should be assessed. Such an analysis can inform sustainable energy policies, helping to keep different options open and to avoid a premature lock-in to potentially sub-optimal socio-technical energy configurations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy, Sustainability and Society\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13705-026-00574-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy, Sustainability and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-026-00574-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/4/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-026-00574-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源系统目前正在经历根本性的变革,出现了几种可能的能源未来,包括各种分散的能源。然而,转型的特点是不确定性,很难评估这些不同能源未来的可持续性。从广泛的可持续性角度来看,过早的选择可能导致锁定在次优路径上,这是一种危险。本文探讨了潜在锁定在通往分散的碳中性能源系统新兴配置的途径上的作用。我们的分析借鉴了“能源未来”的四种新兴的理想型分散配置(个体系统优化、个体自治、集体系统优化和集体自治),以及它们成为能源系统组织的主导形式所需的制度、行动者和技术先决条件。我们开发了一种前瞻性的事前方法来识别可能在过渡路径上产生的紧急锁定。这些新的锁定对分散能源未来的可持续性以及如何评估这种可持续性具有影响。这样的分析可以为可持续能源政策提供信息,有助于保持不同的选择余地,并避免过早锁定潜在的次优社会技术能源配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergent lock-ins in sustainability transitions: the example of energy system decentralisation

Background

Energy systems are currently undergoing fundamental transformations, with several possible energy futures emerging, including various decentralised ones. However, transformations are characterised by uncertainty, and it is difficult to assess the sustainability of these different energy futures. There is a danger that premature choices could lead to lock-ins to sub-optimal pathways as seen from a broad sustainability perspective. This paper explores the role of potential lock-ins on the pathways towards emerging configurations of decentralised, carbon-neutral energy systems. Our analysis draws on four emerging ideal-type decentralisation configurations of ‘energy futures’ (individual system optimisation, individual autonomy, collective system optimisation, and collective autonomy) and the institutional, actor and technological preconditions required for them to become dominant forms of energy system organisation.

Results

We developed a forward-looking, ex-ante approach to identify emergent lock-ins that may be created along the transition pathways.

Conclusions

These new lock-ins have implications for the sustainability of decentralised energy futures and how such sustainability should be assessed. Such an analysis can inform sustainable energy policies, helping to keep different options open and to avoid a premature lock-in to potentially sub-optimal socio-technical energy configurations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy, Sustainability and Society
Energy, Sustainability and Society Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
4.10%
发文量
45
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy, Sustainability and Society is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. It covers topics ranging from scientific research to innovative approaches for technology implementation to analysis of economic, social and environmental impacts of sustainable energy systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书