外科伤口感染:4,468例清洁伤口的前瞻性研究。

M J Gil-Egea, M T Pi-Sunyer, A Verdaguer, F Sanz, A Sitges-Serra, L T Eleizegui
{"title":"外科伤口感染:4,468例清洁伤口的前瞻性研究。","authors":"M J Gil-Egea,&nbsp;M T Pi-Sunyer,&nbsp;A Verdaguer,&nbsp;F Sanz,&nbsp;A Sitges-Serra,&nbsp;L T Eleizegui","doi":"10.1017/s0195941700066236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A prospective four-year study on the infection rate of clean operative wounds is presented. From January 1982 to June 1985, a nurse epidemiologist and a medical team assessed 4,468 operative procedures, from the day of surgery to the patients' discharge from the hospital. The infection rate was 3.2%. A higher incidence of wound infection was detected in patients requiring emergency operations (5.1%), in drained wounds (5.4%), and in patients with conditions thought to predispose to infection, such as advanced cancer, hepatic cirrhosis, diabetes, nephrotic syndrome, previous splenectomy, and treatment with immunosuppressive drugs (7.8%). Age over 65 did not influence infection rates. There were up to tenfold differences in infection indices between surgeons performing the same clean procedures. The continued monitoring of clean wound infection rates allowed the early detection and control of infection outbreaks. Providing periodic information on infection rates to the different surgical services was associated with decreasing infection rates over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":77726,"journal":{"name":"Infection control : IC","volume":"8 7","pages":"277-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s0195941700066236","citationCount":"78","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical wound infections: prospective study of 4,468 clean wounds.\",\"authors\":\"M J Gil-Egea,&nbsp;M T Pi-Sunyer,&nbsp;A Verdaguer,&nbsp;F Sanz,&nbsp;A Sitges-Serra,&nbsp;L T Eleizegui\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0195941700066236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A prospective four-year study on the infection rate of clean operative wounds is presented. From January 1982 to June 1985, a nurse epidemiologist and a medical team assessed 4,468 operative procedures, from the day of surgery to the patients' discharge from the hospital. The infection rate was 3.2%. A higher incidence of wound infection was detected in patients requiring emergency operations (5.1%), in drained wounds (5.4%), and in patients with conditions thought to predispose to infection, such as advanced cancer, hepatic cirrhosis, diabetes, nephrotic syndrome, previous splenectomy, and treatment with immunosuppressive drugs (7.8%). Age over 65 did not influence infection rates. There were up to tenfold differences in infection indices between surgeons performing the same clean procedures. The continued monitoring of clean wound infection rates allowed the early detection and control of infection outbreaks. Providing periodic information on infection rates to the different surgical services was associated with decreasing infection rates over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection control : IC\",\"volume\":\"8 7\",\"pages\":\"277-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s0195941700066236\",\"citationCount\":\"78\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection control : IC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0195941700066236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection control : IC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0195941700066236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

摘要

对清洁手术伤口的感染率进行了为期四年的前瞻性研究。从1982年1月至1985年6月,一名护士流行病学家和一个医疗小组评估了4 468次手术程序,从手术当天到病人出院。感染率为3.2%。需要紧急手术的患者(5.1%)、引流伤口(5.4%)以及被认为易感染的患者(如晚期癌症、肝硬化、糖尿病、肾病综合征、既往脾切除术和免疫抑制药物治疗)的伤口感染发生率较高(7.8%)。65岁以上的年龄对感染率没有影响。在进行相同清洁手术的外科医生之间,感染指数的差异高达10倍。对清洁伤口感染率的持续监测有助于早期发现和控制感染暴发。随着时间的推移,向不同的外科部门提供关于感染率的定期信息与感染率下降有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical wound infections: prospective study of 4,468 clean wounds.

A prospective four-year study on the infection rate of clean operative wounds is presented. From January 1982 to June 1985, a nurse epidemiologist and a medical team assessed 4,468 operative procedures, from the day of surgery to the patients' discharge from the hospital. The infection rate was 3.2%. A higher incidence of wound infection was detected in patients requiring emergency operations (5.1%), in drained wounds (5.4%), and in patients with conditions thought to predispose to infection, such as advanced cancer, hepatic cirrhosis, diabetes, nephrotic syndrome, previous splenectomy, and treatment with immunosuppressive drugs (7.8%). Age over 65 did not influence infection rates. There were up to tenfold differences in infection indices between surgeons performing the same clean procedures. The continued monitoring of clean wound infection rates allowed the early detection and control of infection outbreaks. Providing periodic information on infection rates to the different surgical services was associated with decreasing infection rates over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信