退行性颈椎病的疼痛和感觉异常模式:前瞻性队列中的神经性感觉特征和术后转变。

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yasushi Oshima, Masahiko Sumitani, Yoshitaka Matsubayashi, Hideki Nakamoto, Hiroyuki Nakarai, Hiroyasu Kodama, Tomohiko Shirokoshi, Yudai Kumanomido, Yoshiki Shimokawa, Daiki Urayama, Atsushi Yoshida, Yoshisato Toriyama, So Kato, Yuki Taniguchi, Sakae Tanaka
{"title":"退行性颈椎病的疼痛和感觉异常模式:前瞻性队列中的神经性感觉特征和术后转变。","authors":"Yasushi Oshima, Masahiko Sumitani, Yoshitaka Matsubayashi, Hideki Nakamoto, Hiroyuki Nakarai, Hiroyasu Kodama, Tomohiko Shirokoshi, Yudai Kumanomido, Yoshiki Shimokawa, Daiki Urayama, Atsushi Yoshida, Yoshisato Toriyama, So Kato, Yuki Taniguchi, Sakae Tanaka","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Pain and paresthesia are common in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), yet their relationship and postoperative course remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To categorize patients undergoing surgery for DCM using preoperative pain and paresthesia severity, characterize neuropathic sensory signatures, and quantify postoperative transitions among groups.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Prospective cohort study at a single academic institution.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Of 408 eligible surgical DCM cases, 306 with complete preoperative and 1-year postoperative datasets were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>NRS for hand pain and hand paresthesia; EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D); the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ); Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI); and painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an NRS threshold of 7 to define \"high\" symptoms, patients were classified as Group A (low pain/low paresthesia), Group B (low pain/high paresthesia), and Group C (high pain/high paresthesia). High pain/low paresthesia was rare (n=2, 0.6%) and excluded. Group differences were assessed using parametric/nonparametric tests with multiplicity-adjusted post hoc comparisons. Associations between NRS pain/paresthesia and NPSI items were assessed by Spearman correlation. Postoperative transitions were summarized using a transition matrix and tested for asymmetry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, 159 (51.9%) patients were Group A, 85 (27.8%) Group B, and 60 (19.6%) Group C. Groups B and C had worse preoperative EQ-5D and JOACMEQ scores than Group A, whereas Groups B and C did not differ. At 1 year, EQ-5D and JOACMEQ improved and converged across preoperative groups, despite residual pain/paresthesia in a subset. Paresthesia NRS correlated most closely with NPSI tingling, whereas pain NRS showed higher scores across multiple NPSI domains. Groups B and C shared prominent tingling, but Group C showed broader NPSI elevation and higher PDQ scores. Postoperative transition analysis showed net movement toward Group A, with Group B reaching Group A more frequently than Group C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We investigated pain-paresthesia patterns in DCM patients. Among patients with severe paresthesia, concomitant severe pain was associated with broader neuropathic sensory signatures. Although EQ-5D and JOACMEQ converged after surgery, the likelihood of reaching the low pain/low paresthesia state differed between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain and Paresthesia Patterns in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Neuropathic Sensory Features and Postoperative Transitions in a Prospective Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Yasushi Oshima, Masahiko Sumitani, Yoshitaka Matsubayashi, Hideki Nakamoto, Hiroyuki Nakarai, Hiroyasu Kodama, Tomohiko Shirokoshi, Yudai Kumanomido, Yoshiki Shimokawa, Daiki Urayama, Atsushi Yoshida, Yoshisato Toriyama, So Kato, Yuki Taniguchi, Sakae Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Pain and paresthesia are common in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), yet their relationship and postoperative course remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To categorize patients undergoing surgery for DCM using preoperative pain and paresthesia severity, characterize neuropathic sensory signatures, and quantify postoperative transitions among groups.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Prospective cohort study at a single academic institution.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Of 408 eligible surgical DCM cases, 306 with complete preoperative and 1-year postoperative datasets were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>NRS for hand pain and hand paresthesia; EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D); the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ); Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI); and painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an NRS threshold of 7 to define \\\"high\\\" symptoms, patients were classified as Group A (low pain/low paresthesia), Group B (low pain/high paresthesia), and Group C (high pain/high paresthesia). High pain/low paresthesia was rare (n=2, 0.6%) and excluded. Group differences were assessed using parametric/nonparametric tests with multiplicity-adjusted post hoc comparisons. Associations between NRS pain/paresthesia and NPSI items were assessed by Spearman correlation. Postoperative transitions were summarized using a transition matrix and tested for asymmetry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, 159 (51.9%) patients were Group A, 85 (27.8%) Group B, and 60 (19.6%) Group C. Groups B and C had worse preoperative EQ-5D and JOACMEQ scores than Group A, whereas Groups B and C did not differ. At 1 year, EQ-5D and JOACMEQ improved and converged across preoperative groups, despite residual pain/paresthesia in a subset. Paresthesia NRS correlated most closely with NPSI tingling, whereas pain NRS showed higher scores across multiple NPSI domains. Groups B and C shared prominent tingling, but Group C showed broader NPSI elevation and higher PDQ scores. Postoperative transition analysis showed net movement toward Group A, with Group B reaching Group A more frequently than Group C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We investigated pain-paresthesia patterns in DCM patients. Among patients with severe paresthesia, concomitant severe pain was associated with broader neuropathic sensory signatures. Although EQ-5D and JOACMEQ converged after surgery, the likelihood of reaching the low pain/low paresthesia state differed between groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.016\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疼痛和感觉异常在退行性颈椎病(DCM)中很常见,但它们与术后病程的关系尚不清楚。目的:通过术前疼痛和感觉异常严重程度对DCM手术患者进行分类,表征神经性感觉特征,并量化各组之间的术后转变。研究设计/设置:单一学术机构的前瞻性队列研究。患者样本:在408例符合条件的手术DCM病例中,分析了306例完整的术前和术后1年数据集。结局指标:手部疼痛和手部感觉异常的NRS;EuroQol 5维(EQ-5D);日本骨科协会颈椎病评估问卷(JOACMEQ);神经性疼痛症状量表(NPSI);和painDETECT问卷(PDQ)。方法:采用NRS阈值7定义“高”症状,将患者分为A组(低痛/低感觉异常)、B组(低痛/高感觉异常)和C组(高痛/高感觉异常)。高度疼痛/低感觉异常是罕见的(n=2, 0.6%)和排除。采用参数/非参数检验和多重调整后的事后比较来评估组间差异。采用Spearman相关法评估NRS疼痛/感觉异常与NPSI项目之间的关系。使用过渡矩阵总结术后过渡,并测试不对称性。结果:术前A组159例(51.9%),B组85例(27.8%),C组60例(19.6%)。B组和C组术前EQ-5D和JOACMEQ评分差于A组,B组和C组无差异。在1年时,EQ-5D和JOACMEQ在术前组有所改善并趋于一致,尽管有一部分患者存在残余疼痛/感觉异常。感觉异常NRS与NPSI刺痛最密切相关,而疼痛NRS在多个NPSI域显示更高的分数。B组和C组均有明显的刺痛感,但C组NPSI升高范围更广,PDQ评分更高。术后过渡分析显示净向A组移动,B组比c组更频繁地进入A组。结论:我们研究了DCM患者的疼痛-感觉异常模式。在严重感觉异常的患者中,伴随的严重疼痛与更广泛的神经性感觉特征相关。虽然EQ-5D和JOACMEQ在手术后趋于一致,但两组之间达到低疼痛/低感觉异常状态的可能性存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain and Paresthesia Patterns in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Neuropathic Sensory Features and Postoperative Transitions in a Prospective Cohort.

Background context: Pain and paresthesia are common in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), yet their relationship and postoperative course remain uncertain.

Purpose: To categorize patients undergoing surgery for DCM using preoperative pain and paresthesia severity, characterize neuropathic sensory signatures, and quantify postoperative transitions among groups.

Study design/setting: Prospective cohort study at a single academic institution.

Patient sample: Of 408 eligible surgical DCM cases, 306 with complete preoperative and 1-year postoperative datasets were analyzed.

Outcome measures: NRS for hand pain and hand paresthesia; EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D); the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ); Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI); and painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ).

Methods: Using an NRS threshold of 7 to define "high" symptoms, patients were classified as Group A (low pain/low paresthesia), Group B (low pain/high paresthesia), and Group C (high pain/high paresthesia). High pain/low paresthesia was rare (n=2, 0.6%) and excluded. Group differences were assessed using parametric/nonparametric tests with multiplicity-adjusted post hoc comparisons. Associations between NRS pain/paresthesia and NPSI items were assessed by Spearman correlation. Postoperative transitions were summarized using a transition matrix and tested for asymmetry.

Results: Preoperatively, 159 (51.9%) patients were Group A, 85 (27.8%) Group B, and 60 (19.6%) Group C. Groups B and C had worse preoperative EQ-5D and JOACMEQ scores than Group A, whereas Groups B and C did not differ. At 1 year, EQ-5D and JOACMEQ improved and converged across preoperative groups, despite residual pain/paresthesia in a subset. Paresthesia NRS correlated most closely with NPSI tingling, whereas pain NRS showed higher scores across multiple NPSI domains. Groups B and C shared prominent tingling, but Group C showed broader NPSI elevation and higher PDQ scores. Postoperative transition analysis showed net movement toward Group A, with Group B reaching Group A more frequently than Group C.

Conclusions: We investigated pain-paresthesia patterns in DCM patients. Among patients with severe paresthesia, concomitant severe pain was associated with broader neuropathic sensory signatures. Although EQ-5D and JOACMEQ converged after surgery, the likelihood of reaching the low pain/low paresthesia state differed between groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书