Gillie Cheelo, Hastings Shamaoma, Charles Bwalya Chisanga, Jules Christian Zekeng, Stephen Syampungani
{"title":"评估撒哈拉以南非洲森林破碎化和生物多样性影响:小规模农业景观的方法论挑战和保护战略","authors":"Gillie Cheelo, Hastings Shamaoma, Charles Bwalya Chisanga, Jules Christian Zekeng, Stephen Syampungani","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tropical forests in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) harbor around one-third of the world's species but are becoming more fragmented due to the expansion of human settlements and small-scale agricultural (SCA) areas. This study systematically reviewed the approaches and methods used to analyze forest fragmentation and its impact on biodiversity in SSA, with a focus on their suitability in SCA landscapes. The main findings revealed that most studies in SSA employed generalized approaches to assess fragmentation, failing to account for the distinct contributions of various land cover changes. The other key findings indicate that the majority of studies (i) depended on low-resolution remote sensing imagery, (ii) neglected to assess landscape metrics accuracy, and (iii) had limited focus on socioeconomic aspects. These limitations impede precise and thorough evaluation of SCA's contribution to forest fragmentation. To address these gaps, we recommend the following: (i) adoption of high-resolution images, (ii) integration of socioeconomic data, and (iii) rigorous validation of landscape metrics. Concerning biodiversity implications, 55.2% (21 out of 38) of the reviewed studies reported negative impacts, and 68.2% (26 out of 38) exhibited a taxonomic bias toward avian and tree/plant species. We recommend the following: (i) enhanced utilization of remote sensing data for biodiversity monitoring, (ii) greater emphasis on neglected taxa (e.g., small mammals and amphibians), and (iii) focused conservation initiatives for small forest fragments, which are essential for biodiversity conservation, and reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in SSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70349","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing forest fragmentation and biodiversity impacts in sub-Saharan Africa: Methodological challenges and conservation strategies for small-scale agricultural landscapes\",\"authors\":\"Gillie Cheelo, Hastings Shamaoma, Charles Bwalya Chisanga, Jules Christian Zekeng, Stephen Syampungani\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agg2.70349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Tropical forests in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) harbor around one-third of the world's species but are becoming more fragmented due to the expansion of human settlements and small-scale agricultural (SCA) areas. This study systematically reviewed the approaches and methods used to analyze forest fragmentation and its impact on biodiversity in SSA, with a focus on their suitability in SCA landscapes. The main findings revealed that most studies in SSA employed generalized approaches to assess fragmentation, failing to account for the distinct contributions of various land cover changes. The other key findings indicate that the majority of studies (i) depended on low-resolution remote sensing imagery, (ii) neglected to assess landscape metrics accuracy, and (iii) had limited focus on socioeconomic aspects. These limitations impede precise and thorough evaluation of SCA's contribution to forest fragmentation. To address these gaps, we recommend the following: (i) adoption of high-resolution images, (ii) integration of socioeconomic data, and (iii) rigorous validation of landscape metrics. Concerning biodiversity implications, 55.2% (21 out of 38) of the reviewed studies reported negative impacts, and 68.2% (26 out of 38) exhibited a taxonomic bias toward avian and tree/plant species. We recommend the following: (i) enhanced utilization of remote sensing data for biodiversity monitoring, (ii) greater emphasis on neglected taxa (e.g., small mammals and amphibians), and (iii) focused conservation initiatives for small forest fragments, which are essential for biodiversity conservation, and reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in SSA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70349\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing forest fragmentation and biodiversity impacts in sub-Saharan Africa: Methodological challenges and conservation strategies for small-scale agricultural landscapes
Tropical forests in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) harbor around one-third of the world's species but are becoming more fragmented due to the expansion of human settlements and small-scale agricultural (SCA) areas. This study systematically reviewed the approaches and methods used to analyze forest fragmentation and its impact on biodiversity in SSA, with a focus on their suitability in SCA landscapes. The main findings revealed that most studies in SSA employed generalized approaches to assess fragmentation, failing to account for the distinct contributions of various land cover changes. The other key findings indicate that the majority of studies (i) depended on low-resolution remote sensing imagery, (ii) neglected to assess landscape metrics accuracy, and (iii) had limited focus on socioeconomic aspects. These limitations impede precise and thorough evaluation of SCA's contribution to forest fragmentation. To address these gaps, we recommend the following: (i) adoption of high-resolution images, (ii) integration of socioeconomic data, and (iii) rigorous validation of landscape metrics. Concerning biodiversity implications, 55.2% (21 out of 38) of the reviewed studies reported negative impacts, and 68.2% (26 out of 38) exhibited a taxonomic bias toward avian and tree/plant species. We recommend the following: (i) enhanced utilization of remote sensing data for biodiversity monitoring, (ii) greater emphasis on neglected taxa (e.g., small mammals and amphibians), and (iii) focused conservation initiatives for small forest fragments, which are essential for biodiversity conservation, and reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in SSA.