胸腰椎难产硬膜外镇痛1例永久性臀硅样生物聚合物浸润。

IF 0.8 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
T. Foggi Viligiardi, C. Matteoni, U. Bitossi, M. Micaglio
{"title":"胸腰椎难产硬膜外镇痛1例永久性臀硅样生物聚合物浸润。","authors":"T. Foggi Viligiardi,&nbsp;C. Matteoni,&nbsp;U. Bitossi,&nbsp;M. Micaglio","doi":"10.1002/anr3.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gluteal augmentation procedures with permanent soft tissue fillers, including liquid silicone and silicone-like biopolymers, are widely used. These procedures may be undertaken in settings without strict regulatory oversight. Unlike resorbable materials, permanent fillers can migrate along fascial planes and induce chronic inflammatory reactions, fibrosis and granulomatous reactions, potentially altering normal anatomical structures years after injection. Cranial migration into paraspinal soft tissues has been reported, causing concern regarding neuraxial access, although the implications for neuraxial anaesthesia are unclear. The presence of foreign material in the lumbar region is regarded as a relative or absolute contraindication to epidural or spinal techniques, even in the absence of radiological evidence of epidural space involvement. The key learning points in our case lie in the presence of extensive permanent silicone infiltration within the gluteal and lower lumbar soft tissues and in the anatomical assessment and clinical decision-making informed by radiology investigations. We report a case of a parturient with documented permanent gluteal silicone infiltration who had previously been considered unsuitable for neuraxial labour analgesia. Radiological re-assessment enabled the identification of a safe thoracolumbar approach to labour epidural analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":72186,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia reports","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13062754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoracolumbar labour epidural analgesia in a parturient with permanent gluteal silicone-like biopolymer infiltration\",\"authors\":\"T. Foggi Viligiardi,&nbsp;C. Matteoni,&nbsp;U. Bitossi,&nbsp;M. Micaglio\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/anr3.70060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Gluteal augmentation procedures with permanent soft tissue fillers, including liquid silicone and silicone-like biopolymers, are widely used. These procedures may be undertaken in settings without strict regulatory oversight. Unlike resorbable materials, permanent fillers can migrate along fascial planes and induce chronic inflammatory reactions, fibrosis and granulomatous reactions, potentially altering normal anatomical structures years after injection. Cranial migration into paraspinal soft tissues has been reported, causing concern regarding neuraxial access, although the implications for neuraxial anaesthesia are unclear. The presence of foreign material in the lumbar region is regarded as a relative or absolute contraindication to epidural or spinal techniques, even in the absence of radiological evidence of epidural space involvement. The key learning points in our case lie in the presence of extensive permanent silicone infiltration within the gluteal and lower lumbar soft tissues and in the anatomical assessment and clinical decision-making informed by radiology investigations. We report a case of a parturient with documented permanent gluteal silicone infiltration who had previously been considered unsuitable for neuraxial labour analgesia. Radiological re-assessment enabled the identification of a safe thoracolumbar approach to labour epidural analgesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia reports\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13062754/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anr3.70060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anr3.70060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

臀肌增大手术采用永久性软组织填充物,包括液态硅酮和类硅酮生物聚合物,被广泛使用。这些程序可以在没有严格监管的环境中进行。与可吸收材料不同,永久性填充物可以沿筋膜平面迁移,引起慢性炎症反应、纤维化和肉芽肿反应,注射后数年可能会改变正常的解剖结构。颅向棘旁软组织的移位已被报道,引起了对神经轴通路的关注,尽管对神经轴麻醉的影响尚不清楚。即使没有硬膜外腔受累的放射学证据,腰椎区存在异物也被认为是硬膜外或脊柱技术的相对或绝对禁忌症。在我们的病例中,关键的学习点在于臀部和下腰椎软组织中存在广泛的永久性硅胶浸润,以及通过放射学调查进行解剖评估和临床决策。我们报告一个病例的产妇记录永久臀硅胶浸润谁曾被认为不适合神经轴分娩镇痛。放射学重新评估确定了一种安全的胸腰椎硬膜外分娩镇痛方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Thoracolumbar labour epidural analgesia in a parturient with permanent gluteal silicone-like biopolymer infiltration

Thoracolumbar labour epidural analgesia in a parturient with permanent gluteal silicone-like biopolymer infiltration

Gluteal augmentation procedures with permanent soft tissue fillers, including liquid silicone and silicone-like biopolymers, are widely used. These procedures may be undertaken in settings without strict regulatory oversight. Unlike resorbable materials, permanent fillers can migrate along fascial planes and induce chronic inflammatory reactions, fibrosis and granulomatous reactions, potentially altering normal anatomical structures years after injection. Cranial migration into paraspinal soft tissues has been reported, causing concern regarding neuraxial access, although the implications for neuraxial anaesthesia are unclear. The presence of foreign material in the lumbar region is regarded as a relative or absolute contraindication to epidural or spinal techniques, even in the absence of radiological evidence of epidural space involvement. The key learning points in our case lie in the presence of extensive permanent silicone infiltration within the gluteal and lower lumbar soft tissues and in the anatomical assessment and clinical decision-making informed by radiology investigations. We report a case of a parturient with documented permanent gluteal silicone infiltration who had previously been considered unsuitable for neuraxial labour analgesia. Radiological re-assessment enabled the identification of a safe thoracolumbar approach to labour epidural analgesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书