利益相关者对成人日托中心场地和建筑设计特征的偏好差异。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shwn-Jen Lee, Sheng-Wen Su, Hong-Ji Luo
{"title":"利益相关者对成人日托中心场地和建筑设计特征的偏好差异。","authors":"Shwn-Jen Lee, Sheng-Wen Su, Hong-Ji Luo","doi":"10.1177/19375867261433021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AimTo compare the perspectives of two stakeholder groups, adult day care center (ADCC) managers and family members of older adults with disabilities or dementia, regarding ADCC site and building design features.BackgroundThe ADCCs provide community-based services for older adults with disabilities or dementia and support family caregivers. Different stakeholder groups, including managers and family caregivers, may have varying views on the planning and design of health facilities. However, little is known about how managers and family members differ in their views on ADCC planning and design.MethodsWe adopted a cross-sectional exploratory design across Taiwan. Ten site selection factors and eight building design factors were used to construct an analytic hierarchy process questionnaire. A total of 81 managers and 59 family members were included, and the data were collected using one-on-one interviews. Pairwise comparisons between factors were conducted to obtain the eigenvectors (priority weights), and weight differences between the managers and family members were calculated using <i>t</i>-tests.ResultsManagers placed higher importance on community attitudes and governmental support, while family members emphasized access to health services, transportation, and public safety. In building design, family members valued clearer spatial visibility, whereas managers placed relatively greater emphasis on temperature control.ConclusionsManagers and family members of service users weighed site and building design factors differently, especially in the domains related to \"support and attitudes\" and \"services, systems, and policies.\" These findings highlight important differences between these two stakeholder groups and provide critical insights for the planning and design of ADCCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47306,"journal":{"name":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19375867261433021"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stakeholder Differences in Preferences for Adult Day Care Center Site and Building Design Features.\",\"authors\":\"Shwn-Jen Lee, Sheng-Wen Su, Hong-Ji Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19375867261433021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AimTo compare the perspectives of two stakeholder groups, adult day care center (ADCC) managers and family members of older adults with disabilities or dementia, regarding ADCC site and building design features.BackgroundThe ADCCs provide community-based services for older adults with disabilities or dementia and support family caregivers. Different stakeholder groups, including managers and family caregivers, may have varying views on the planning and design of health facilities. However, little is known about how managers and family members differ in their views on ADCC planning and design.MethodsWe adopted a cross-sectional exploratory design across Taiwan. Ten site selection factors and eight building design factors were used to construct an analytic hierarchy process questionnaire. A total of 81 managers and 59 family members were included, and the data were collected using one-on-one interviews. Pairwise comparisons between factors were conducted to obtain the eigenvectors (priority weights), and weight differences between the managers and family members were calculated using <i>t</i>-tests.ResultsManagers placed higher importance on community attitudes and governmental support, while family members emphasized access to health services, transportation, and public safety. In building design, family members valued clearer spatial visibility, whereas managers placed relatively greater emphasis on temperature control.ConclusionsManagers and family members of service users weighed site and building design factors differently, especially in the domains related to \\\"support and attitudes\\\" and \\\"services, systems, and policies.\\\" These findings highlight important differences between these two stakeholder groups and provide critical insights for the planning and design of ADCCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19375867261433021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867261433021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867261433021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较两个利益相关者群体,成人日托中心(ADCC)的管理者和残疾或痴呆症老年人的家庭成员,对ADCC场地和建筑设计特点的看法。adcc为患有残疾或痴呆症的老年人提供社区服务,并支持家庭照顾者。不同的利益相关者群体,包括管理人员和家庭照顾者,可能对卫生设施的规划和设计有不同的看法。然而,对于管理者和家族成员在ADCC规划和设计方面的不同看法,人们知之甚少。方法采用横断面探索性设计。采用10个选址因素和8个建筑设计因素构建层次分析法问卷。共纳入81名管理人员和59名家庭成员,采用一对一访谈的方式收集数据。两两比较各因素获得特征向量(优先权重),采用t检验计算管理者与家庭成员之间的权重差。结果管理者更重视社区态度和政府支持,而家庭成员更重视获得卫生服务、交通和公共安全。在建筑设计中,家庭成员更看重清晰的空间可视性,而管理者则相对更重视温度控制。结论:管理者和服务使用者的家庭成员对场地和建筑设计因素的权衡不同,特别是在“支持和态度”和“服务、系统和政策”相关的领域。这些发现突出了这两个利益相关者群体之间的重要差异,并为adc的规划和设计提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stakeholder Differences in Preferences for Adult Day Care Center Site and Building Design Features.

AimTo compare the perspectives of two stakeholder groups, adult day care center (ADCC) managers and family members of older adults with disabilities or dementia, regarding ADCC site and building design features.BackgroundThe ADCCs provide community-based services for older adults with disabilities or dementia and support family caregivers. Different stakeholder groups, including managers and family caregivers, may have varying views on the planning and design of health facilities. However, little is known about how managers and family members differ in their views on ADCC planning and design.MethodsWe adopted a cross-sectional exploratory design across Taiwan. Ten site selection factors and eight building design factors were used to construct an analytic hierarchy process questionnaire. A total of 81 managers and 59 family members were included, and the data were collected using one-on-one interviews. Pairwise comparisons between factors were conducted to obtain the eigenvectors (priority weights), and weight differences between the managers and family members were calculated using t-tests.ResultsManagers placed higher importance on community attitudes and governmental support, while family members emphasized access to health services, transportation, and public safety. In building design, family members valued clearer spatial visibility, whereas managers placed relatively greater emphasis on temperature control.ConclusionsManagers and family members of service users weighed site and building design factors differently, especially in the domains related to "support and attitudes" and "services, systems, and policies." These findings highlight important differences between these two stakeholder groups and provide critical insights for the planning and design of ADCCs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
22.70%
发文量
82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书