咨询情况导致皮肤癌检测在澳大利亚的一般做法。

IF 0.9 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Alex Li Majri, Lucy Gilkes, Diane E Arnold-Reed
{"title":"咨询情况导致皮肤癌检测在澳大利亚的一般做法。","authors":"Alex Li Majri, Lucy Gilkes, Diane E Arnold-Reed","doi":"10.1071/HC26002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>General practitioners (GPs) diagnose and manage most skin cancers in Australia, often within time-limited consultations involving multimorbid patients. There is limited evidence describing the consultation circumstances in which skin cancers are detected.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to describe the most common consultation circumstances associated with skin cancer detection in Australian general practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective descriptive study across three general practices in Perth, Western Australia. In phase 1, we interviewed eight GPs to identify common consultation circumstances that lead to skin cancer detection and developed descriptive categories. In phase 2, we reviewed medical records of patients who had undergone skin cancer excision in the preceding 12 months, identified using Medicare item numbers. Consultation notes from the visit in which the lesion was identified were reviewed and classified using the phase 1 categories. We also recorded the number of problems managed per consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 103 patient records from 210 eligible records. Most patients were aged over 60 years, and 73% had a documented history of skin cancer. Skin cancers were most commonly detected during multi-issue consultations addressing other health concerns (74.8%). Detection also occurred during general skin checks (21.4%), presentations for a single lesion (15.5%), and incidental findings during unrelated consultations (10.7%). GPs managed a mean of 2.90 problems per consultation. Percentages exceed 100% because more than one consultation category could apply to a single consultation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Skin cancer detection commonly occurs within complex consultations addressing multiple competing health issues, supporting opportunistic assessment and risk-based follow-up in general practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consultation circumstances leading to skin cancer detection in Australian general practice.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Li Majri, Lucy Gilkes, Diane E Arnold-Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/HC26002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>General practitioners (GPs) diagnose and manage most skin cancers in Australia, often within time-limited consultations involving multimorbid patients. There is limited evidence describing the consultation circumstances in which skin cancers are detected.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to describe the most common consultation circumstances associated with skin cancer detection in Australian general practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective descriptive study across three general practices in Perth, Western Australia. In phase 1, we interviewed eight GPs to identify common consultation circumstances that lead to skin cancer detection and developed descriptive categories. In phase 2, we reviewed medical records of patients who had undergone skin cancer excision in the preceding 12 months, identified using Medicare item numbers. Consultation notes from the visit in which the lesion was identified were reviewed and classified using the phase 1 categories. We also recorded the number of problems managed per consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 103 patient records from 210 eligible records. Most patients were aged over 60 years, and 73% had a documented history of skin cancer. Skin cancers were most commonly detected during multi-issue consultations addressing other health concerns (74.8%). Detection also occurred during general skin checks (21.4%), presentations for a single lesion (15.5%), and incidental findings during unrelated consultations (10.7%). GPs managed a mean of 2.90 problems per consultation. Percentages exceed 100% because more than one consultation category could apply to a single consultation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Skin cancer detection commonly occurs within complex consultations addressing multiple competing health issues, supporting opportunistic assessment and risk-based follow-up in general practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of primary health care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of primary health care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC26002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC26002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:全科医生(全科医生)诊断和管理大多数皮肤癌在澳大利亚,往往在有限的时间内咨询涉及多病患者。有有限的证据说明在咨询的情况下发现皮肤癌。目的:本研究旨在描述最常见的咨询情况与皮肤癌检测在澳大利亚全科医生。方法:我们对西澳大利亚州珀斯的三家全科诊所进行了回顾性描述性研究。在第一阶段,我们采访了8位全科医生,以确定导致皮肤癌检测的常见咨询情况,并制定了描述性分类。在第二阶段,我们回顾了在过去12个月内接受皮肤癌切除术的患者的医疗记录,使用医疗保险项目编号进行识别。检查确认病变的会诊记录,并使用第一阶段分类进行分类。我们还记录了每次咨询处理的问题数量。结果:我们从210例符合条件的记录中审查了103例患者记录。大多数患者年龄在60岁以上,73%的患者有皮肤癌病史。皮肤癌最常在解决其他健康问题的多问题咨询中被发现(74.8%)。一般皮肤检查(21.4%)、单一病变(15.5%)和无关会诊时的偶然发现(10.7%)也有发现。全科医生每次咨询平均处理2.90个问题。百分比超过100%是因为多个咨询类别可以适用于单个咨询。讨论:皮肤癌的检测通常发生在解决多个相互竞争的健康问题的复杂咨询中,支持在一般实践中进行机会性评估和基于风险的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consultation circumstances leading to skin cancer detection in Australian general practice.

Introduction: General practitioners (GPs) diagnose and manage most skin cancers in Australia, often within time-limited consultations involving multimorbid patients. There is limited evidence describing the consultation circumstances in which skin cancers are detected.

Aim: This study aims to describe the most common consultation circumstances associated with skin cancer detection in Australian general practice.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study across three general practices in Perth, Western Australia. In phase 1, we interviewed eight GPs to identify common consultation circumstances that lead to skin cancer detection and developed descriptive categories. In phase 2, we reviewed medical records of patients who had undergone skin cancer excision in the preceding 12 months, identified using Medicare item numbers. Consultation notes from the visit in which the lesion was identified were reviewed and classified using the phase 1 categories. We also recorded the number of problems managed per consultation.

Results: We reviewed 103 patient records from 210 eligible records. Most patients were aged over 60 years, and 73% had a documented history of skin cancer. Skin cancers were most commonly detected during multi-issue consultations addressing other health concerns (74.8%). Detection also occurred during general skin checks (21.4%), presentations for a single lesion (15.5%), and incidental findings during unrelated consultations (10.7%). GPs managed a mean of 2.90 problems per consultation. Percentages exceed 100% because more than one consultation category could apply to a single consultation.

Discussion: Skin cancer detection commonly occurs within complex consultations addressing multiple competing health issues, supporting opportunistic assessment and risk-based follow-up in general practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of primary health care
Journal of primary health care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书