胸外科患者术后肺炎的危险因素识别和建立基于点的风险计算器。

Q3 Medicine
Zachary Petterson, Sarah Cook, Hayden Johnston, Olivia Caldwell, Sadeeka Al-Majid, Cyril Rakovski, Mark H Gabot
{"title":"胸外科患者术后肺炎的危险因素识别和建立基于点的风险计算器。","authors":"Zachary Petterson, Sarah Cook, Hayden Johnston, Olivia Caldwell, Sadeeka Al-Majid, Cyril Rakovski, Mark H Gabot","doi":"10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This secondary data analysis used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP), logistic regression (Method 1), Xtreme Gradient Boosting (Method 2), and a 12-member expert panel (Method 3) to develop and validate a predictive model to identify patients undergoing thoracic surgery at risk for postoperative pneumonia (POP). Twenty-three covariates associated with POP were selected from the 2013-2022 ACS NSQIP dataset filtered for thoracic surgeries. Method 1 and Method 2 were assessed through area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) using 10-fold cross-validation. Method 3 evaluated the 23 covariates for relevance to POP and relevant predictors were assessed through AUC ROC. Method 1 identified nine significant predictors (<i>P</i> < .05) with a 10-fold cross-validated AUC ROC = .72 (fair classifier). The significant preoperative predictors and their effect size were, sepsis (1.43), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (1.04), male gender (.77), bleeding disorder (.57), current smoker within 1 year (0.39), disseminated cancer (.39), hypoalbuminemia (.33), history of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (.31), and anemia (.05). Method 2 achieved a 10-fold cross-validation AUC ROC = .75 (fair classifier). Method 3 had an AUC ROC = .6 (poor classifier). The nine significant predictors from Method 1 were used to develop a risk-based calculator.</p>","PeriodicalId":7104,"journal":{"name":"AANA journal","volume":"94 2","pages":"115-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Risk Factors and Creating a Point-Based Risk Calculator for Postoperative Pneumonia in Thoracic Surgery Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Petterson, Sarah Cook, Hayden Johnston, Olivia Caldwell, Sadeeka Al-Majid, Cyril Rakovski, Mark H Gabot\",\"doi\":\"10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This secondary data analysis used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP), logistic regression (Method 1), Xtreme Gradient Boosting (Method 2), and a 12-member expert panel (Method 3) to develop and validate a predictive model to identify patients undergoing thoracic surgery at risk for postoperative pneumonia (POP). Twenty-three covariates associated with POP were selected from the 2013-2022 ACS NSQIP dataset filtered for thoracic surgeries. Method 1 and Method 2 were assessed through area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) using 10-fold cross-validation. Method 3 evaluated the 23 covariates for relevance to POP and relevant predictors were assessed through AUC ROC. Method 1 identified nine significant predictors (<i>P</i> < .05) with a 10-fold cross-validated AUC ROC = .72 (fair classifier). The significant preoperative predictors and their effect size were, sepsis (1.43), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (1.04), male gender (.77), bleeding disorder (.57), current smoker within 1 year (0.39), disseminated cancer (.39), hypoalbuminemia (.33), history of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (.31), and anemia (.05). Method 2 achieved a 10-fold cross-validation AUC ROC = .75 (fair classifier). Method 3 had an AUC ROC = .6 (poor classifier). The nine significant predictors from Method 1 were used to develop a risk-based calculator.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AANA journal\",\"volume\":\"94 2\",\"pages\":\"115-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AANA journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AANA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70278/AANAJ/.0000001053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该辅助数据分析采用美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划(ACS NSQIP)、logistic回归(方法1)、Xtreme梯度增强(方法2)和一个12人专家小组(方法3)来开发和验证预测模型,以识别接受胸外科手术的患者术后肺炎(POP)风险。从2013-2022年ACS NSQIP胸外科手术数据集中选择23个与POP相关的协变量。方法1和方法2采用10倍交叉验证,通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC ROC)进行评价。方法3评估23个协变量与POP的相关性,并通过AUC ROC评估相关预测因子。方法1确定了9个显著预测因子(P < 0.05), 10倍交叉验证AUC ROC = 0.72(公平分类器)。术前显著的预测因子及其效应量为:脓毒症(1.43)、全身炎症反应综合征(1.04)、男性(1.05)。77),出血性疾病(。1年内吸烟(0.39),播散性癌症(0.39)。39),低白蛋白血症(。33),严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病史(。31),贫血(0.05)。方法2获得10倍交叉验证AUC ROC = .75(公平分类器)。方法3的AUC ROC = .6(分类不良)。方法1中的9个显著预测因子用于开发基于风险的计算器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying Risk Factors and Creating a Point-Based Risk Calculator for Postoperative Pneumonia in Thoracic Surgery Patients.

This secondary data analysis used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP), logistic regression (Method 1), Xtreme Gradient Boosting (Method 2), and a 12-member expert panel (Method 3) to develop and validate a predictive model to identify patients undergoing thoracic surgery at risk for postoperative pneumonia (POP). Twenty-three covariates associated with POP were selected from the 2013-2022 ACS NSQIP dataset filtered for thoracic surgeries. Method 1 and Method 2 were assessed through area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) using 10-fold cross-validation. Method 3 evaluated the 23 covariates for relevance to POP and relevant predictors were assessed through AUC ROC. Method 1 identified nine significant predictors (P < .05) with a 10-fold cross-validated AUC ROC = .72 (fair classifier). The significant preoperative predictors and their effect size were, sepsis (1.43), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (1.04), male gender (.77), bleeding disorder (.57), current smoker within 1 year (0.39), disseminated cancer (.39), hypoalbuminemia (.33), history of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (.31), and anemia (.05). Method 2 achieved a 10-fold cross-validation AUC ROC = .75 (fair classifier). Method 3 had an AUC ROC = .6 (poor classifier). The nine significant predictors from Method 1 were used to develop a risk-based calculator.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AANA journal
AANA journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Founded in 1931 and located in Park Ridge, Ill., the AANA is the professional organization for more than 90 percent of the nation’s nurse anesthetists. As advanced practice nurses, CRNAs administer approximately 32 million anesthetics in the United States each year. CRNAs practice in every setting where anesthesia is available and are the sole anesthesia providers in more than two-thirds of all rural hospitals. They administer every type of anesthetic, and provide care for every type of surgery or procedure, from open heart to cataract to pain management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书