{"title":"日本乳腺癌协会的一项合作研究:确定保乳手术阳性切缘的指南发表后再切除率的变化。","authors":"Takehiko Sakai, Yuri Kimura, Makoto Ishitobi, Atsushi Yoshida, Yasuaki Sagara, Yuka Ono, Koji Takada, Yuko Takahashi, Takahiro Tsukioki, Mao Kimoto, Tomo Osako","doi":"10.1007/s12282-026-01853-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: The 2014 SSO-ASTRO consensus guidelines redefined a positive margin requiring re-excision after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) as “tumor on ink,” with several studies internationally demonstrating decreased re-excision rates thereafter. In Japan, this definition has been explicitly incorporated into the 2018 Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) guidelines; however, its impact on national clinical practice remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey of 521 JBCS-accredited institutions regarding BCS practices, imaging, surgery, margin assessment, and re-excision rates before and after 2018. In parallel, a multicenter retrospective cohort study from seven institutions analyzed positive margins and re-excision trends between 2008 and 2022. RESULTS: Overall, 262 institutions (response rate 55.7%) participated in the survey. Institutions reporting a positive margin rate of 0–10% increased from 47 to 63% in 2018. Institutions with a re-excision rate of 0–10% increased from 45 to 49%. In a cohort study of 18,688 BCS cases, positive margin rates fell from 11.2% (2008–14) to10.1% (2015–18) and 7.9% (2019–22), and re-excision rates from 7.6% to 6.6% and 4.9%. Multivariate analysis identified younger age, invasive lobular carcinoma, larger tumor size, lymph node positivity, and earlier surgical period as significant predictors of re-excision. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study demonstrates that the implementation of international and domestic guidelines has contributed to a significant yet gradual reduction in re-excision rates following BCS in Japan. These improvements reflect Japan's already-low positive margin and re-excision rates, which have been maintained through rigorous comprehensive margin assessment methodologies. </p>","PeriodicalId":520574,"journal":{"name":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","volume":" ","pages":"761-769"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in re-excision rates after publication of guidelines defining positive margins for breast-conserving surgery: a collaborative study of the Japanese breast cancer society.\",\"authors\":\"Takehiko Sakai, Yuri Kimura, Makoto Ishitobi, Atsushi Yoshida, Yasuaki Sagara, Yuka Ono, Koji Takada, Yuko Takahashi, Takahiro Tsukioki, Mao Kimoto, Tomo Osako\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12282-026-01853-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND: The 2014 SSO-ASTRO consensus guidelines redefined a positive margin requiring re-excision after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) as “tumor on ink,” with several studies internationally demonstrating decreased re-excision rates thereafter. In Japan, this definition has been explicitly incorporated into the 2018 Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) guidelines; however, its impact on national clinical practice remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey of 521 JBCS-accredited institutions regarding BCS practices, imaging, surgery, margin assessment, and re-excision rates before and after 2018. In parallel, a multicenter retrospective cohort study from seven institutions analyzed positive margins and re-excision trends between 2008 and 2022. RESULTS: Overall, 262 institutions (response rate 55.7%) participated in the survey. Institutions reporting a positive margin rate of 0–10% increased from 47 to 63% in 2018. Institutions with a re-excision rate of 0–10% increased from 45 to 49%. In a cohort study of 18,688 BCS cases, positive margin rates fell from 11.2% (2008–14) to10.1% (2015–18) and 7.9% (2019–22), and re-excision rates from 7.6% to 6.6% and 4.9%. Multivariate analysis identified younger age, invasive lobular carcinoma, larger tumor size, lymph node positivity, and earlier surgical period as significant predictors of re-excision. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study demonstrates that the implementation of international and domestic guidelines has contributed to a significant yet gradual reduction in re-excision rates following BCS in Japan. These improvements reflect Japan's already-low positive margin and re-excision rates, which have been maintained through rigorous comprehensive margin assessment methodologies. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"761-769\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-026-01853-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/4/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-026-01853-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Changes in re-excision rates after publication of guidelines defining positive margins for breast-conserving surgery: a collaborative study of the Japanese breast cancer society.
BACKGROUND: The 2014 SSO-ASTRO consensus guidelines redefined a positive margin requiring re-excision after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) as “tumor on ink,” with several studies internationally demonstrating decreased re-excision rates thereafter. In Japan, this definition has been explicitly incorporated into the 2018 Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) guidelines; however, its impact on national clinical practice remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey of 521 JBCS-accredited institutions regarding BCS practices, imaging, surgery, margin assessment, and re-excision rates before and after 2018. In parallel, a multicenter retrospective cohort study from seven institutions analyzed positive margins and re-excision trends between 2008 and 2022. RESULTS: Overall, 262 institutions (response rate 55.7%) participated in the survey. Institutions reporting a positive margin rate of 0–10% increased from 47 to 63% in 2018. Institutions with a re-excision rate of 0–10% increased from 45 to 49%. In a cohort study of 18,688 BCS cases, positive margin rates fell from 11.2% (2008–14) to10.1% (2015–18) and 7.9% (2019–22), and re-excision rates from 7.6% to 6.6% and 4.9%. Multivariate analysis identified younger age, invasive lobular carcinoma, larger tumor size, lymph node positivity, and earlier surgical period as significant predictors of re-excision. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study demonstrates that the implementation of international and domestic guidelines has contributed to a significant yet gradual reduction in re-excision rates following BCS in Japan. These improvements reflect Japan's already-low positive margin and re-excision rates, which have been maintained through rigorous comprehensive margin assessment methodologies.