新生儿导管支架置入术的挑战:何时避免导管扭曲和肺动脉狭窄。

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-16 DOI:10.4103/apc.apc_148_25
Sakthi Saravanan, Navaneetha Sasikumar, Raman Krishna Kumar
{"title":"新生儿导管支架置入术的挑战:何时避免导管扭曲和肺动脉狭窄。","authors":"Sakthi Saravanan, Navaneetha Sasikumar, Raman Krishna Kumar","doi":"10.4103/apc.apc_148_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ductal stenting (DS) is the preferred palliative approach to the Blalock-Thomas-Taussig shunt (BTTS) for neonates with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation. However, appropriate case selection remains a critical challenge. This report explores the limitations of DS through illustrative examples and defines the subset in which neonatal DS is better avoided. Tortuous ducts increase the risk of procedural failure, ductal spasm, and pulmonary artery (PA) jailing. These can generally be managed with wire techniques and stiff wires. If extreme curvature persists despite these measures, it is best to abandon the procedure. Bilateral PA stenosis needs careful strategic planning and is often better managed surgically. Procedural risk is significantly high when both branch PA stenosis and tortuosity coexist, necessitating a BTTS. This pictorial report specifies anatomical substrates that are unsuitable for neonatal DS to improve safety and efficacy. It is intended as a visual reference for interventionists facing comparable clinical scenarios, particularly in early career.</p>","PeriodicalId":8026,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology","volume":"18 6","pages":"586-589"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13048712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in neonatal ductal stenting: When to avoid tortuous ducts and pulmonary artery stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Sakthi Saravanan, Navaneetha Sasikumar, Raman Krishna Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/apc.apc_148_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ductal stenting (DS) is the preferred palliative approach to the Blalock-Thomas-Taussig shunt (BTTS) for neonates with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation. However, appropriate case selection remains a critical challenge. This report explores the limitations of DS through illustrative examples and defines the subset in which neonatal DS is better avoided. Tortuous ducts increase the risk of procedural failure, ductal spasm, and pulmonary artery (PA) jailing. These can generally be managed with wire techniques and stiff wires. If extreme curvature persists despite these measures, it is best to abandon the procedure. Bilateral PA stenosis needs careful strategic planning and is often better managed surgically. Procedural risk is significantly high when both branch PA stenosis and tortuosity coexist, necessitating a BTTS. This pictorial report specifies anatomical substrates that are unsuitable for neonatal DS to improve safety and efficacy. It is intended as a visual reference for interventionists facing comparable clinical scenarios, particularly in early career.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"586-589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13048712/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/apc.apc_148_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/3/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/apc.apc_148_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导管支架置入术(DS)是治疗新生儿导管依赖肺循环的首选姑息性方法。然而,适当的病例选择仍然是一个关键的挑战。本报告通过说明性的例子探讨了退行性椎体滑移的局限性,并定义了新生儿退行性椎体滑移最好避免的子集。弯曲的导管增加了手术失败、导管痉挛和肺动脉(PA)监禁的风险。这些通常可以用钢丝技术和硬钢丝来处理。如果尽管采取了这些措施,极端的弯曲仍然存在,最好放弃手术。双侧PA狭窄需要仔细的策略规划,通常手术治疗效果更好。当分支PA狭窄和扭曲并存时,手术风险明显高,需要行BTTS。本图片报告明确了不适合新生儿退行性椎体滑移的解剖底物,以提高安全性和疗效。它的目的是作为一个视觉参考的介入面临类似的临床情况,特别是在早期的职业生涯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges in neonatal ductal stenting: When to avoid tortuous ducts and pulmonary artery stenosis.

Ductal stenting (DS) is the preferred palliative approach to the Blalock-Thomas-Taussig shunt (BTTS) for neonates with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation. However, appropriate case selection remains a critical challenge. This report explores the limitations of DS through illustrative examples and defines the subset in which neonatal DS is better avoided. Tortuous ducts increase the risk of procedural failure, ductal spasm, and pulmonary artery (PA) jailing. These can generally be managed with wire techniques and stiff wires. If extreme curvature persists despite these measures, it is best to abandon the procedure. Bilateral PA stenosis needs careful strategic planning and is often better managed surgically. Procedural risk is significantly high when both branch PA stenosis and tortuosity coexist, necessitating a BTTS. This pictorial report specifies anatomical substrates that are unsuitable for neonatal DS to improve safety and efficacy. It is intended as a visual reference for interventionists facing comparable clinical scenarios, particularly in early career.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书