政策转变和漂移:从澳大利亚国家残疾保险计划的意图到实施

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Australian Journal of Public Administration Pub Date : 2026-03-05 Epub Date: 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1111/1467-8500.12689
Eloise Hummell, Michele Foster, Kylie Burns, Sue Harris Rimmer
{"title":"政策转变和漂移:从澳大利亚国家残疾保险计划的意图到实施","authors":"Eloise Hummell,&nbsp;Michele Foster,&nbsp;Kylie Burns,&nbsp;Sue Harris Rimmer","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>It is not uncommon that original aspirations of social policy go astray during implementation. Issues that are the focus of social policy are often tied to various competing social, political, and value positions, making them unfailingly ‘wicked’ and rendering the design and implementation of solutions inherently challenging. Such is the case with Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), which has been plagued by implementation problems and criticised for straying from its original objectives and principles. In this article, interview data from 31 stakeholders identify perceptions of congruence of the NDIS with its original objectives and values during the decade since inception, particularly focused on decision-making of reasonable and necessary supports. The perceived shift from disability rights to fights for entitlements and changing narrative of cost containment is indicative not only of implementation challenges but the inevitability of ongoing value disputes that often plague complex social issues. At a time of major NDIS reform amid ongoing tensions and debates, goal clarity and better decision guidance remain critical for future policy design and implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Perspectives from diverse stakeholders across Australia explore where and why the NDIS may have drifted away from its original values, especially pertaining to reasonable and necessary supports.</li>\n \n <li>While stakeholders identified cost, sustainability, and consistency as increasingly significant issues in NDIS implementation, initial rights-based and person-centred objectives envisioned during policy design were seen as retreating.</li>\n \n <li>The inherent value tensions and contestations within the reasonable and necessary criteria have been under-recognised and inevitably persist in NDIS implementation.</li>\n \n <li>Critical insights for future policy reform can be gained from thinking about implementation issues and understanding when and why good intentions wander off course.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"85 1","pages":"71-90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8500.12689","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy shifts and drifts: From intention to implementation of Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme\",\"authors\":\"Eloise Hummell,&nbsp;Michele Foster,&nbsp;Kylie Burns,&nbsp;Sue Harris Rimmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8500.12689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>It is not uncommon that original aspirations of social policy go astray during implementation. Issues that are the focus of social policy are often tied to various competing social, political, and value positions, making them unfailingly ‘wicked’ and rendering the design and implementation of solutions inherently challenging. Such is the case with Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), which has been plagued by implementation problems and criticised for straying from its original objectives and principles. In this article, interview data from 31 stakeholders identify perceptions of congruence of the NDIS with its original objectives and values during the decade since inception, particularly focused on decision-making of reasonable and necessary supports. The perceived shift from disability rights to fights for entitlements and changing narrative of cost containment is indicative not only of implementation challenges but the inevitability of ongoing value disputes that often plague complex social issues. At a time of major NDIS reform amid ongoing tensions and debates, goal clarity and better decision guidance remain critical for future policy design and implementation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Perspectives from diverse stakeholders across Australia explore where and why the NDIS may have drifted away from its original values, especially pertaining to reasonable and necessary supports.</li>\\n \\n <li>While stakeholders identified cost, sustainability, and consistency as increasingly significant issues in NDIS implementation, initial rights-based and person-centred objectives envisioned during policy design were seen as retreating.</li>\\n \\n <li>The inherent value tensions and contestations within the reasonable and necessary criteria have been under-recognised and inevitably persist in NDIS implementation.</li>\\n \\n <li>Critical insights for future policy reform can be gained from thinking about implementation issues and understanding when and why good intentions wander off course.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Public Administration\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"71-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8500.12689\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12689\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12689","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会政策的初衷在实施过程中偏离正轨的情况并不罕见。作为社会政策焦点的问题往往与各种相互竞争的社会、政治和价值立场联系在一起,使它们始终是“邪恶的”,并使解决方案的设计和实施具有固有的挑战性。澳大利亚的国家残疾保险计划(NDIS)就是这样一个例子,该计划一直受到实施问题的困扰,并被批评偏离了最初的目标和原则。在本文中,来自31个利益相关者的访谈数据确定了自NDIS成立以来的十年中对其原始目标和价值观的一致性的看法,特别是对合理和必要支持的决策的关注。从残疾人权利到争取权利的转变,以及成本控制叙事的变化,不仅表明了实施方面的挑战,而且表明了经常困扰复杂社会问题的持续价值争议的必然性。在紧张局势和争论不断的情况下,NDIS正在进行重大改革,明确目标和更好的决策指导对未来的政策设计和实施仍然至关重要。来自澳大利亚各地不同利益相关者的观点探讨了NDIS可能偏离其原始价值的地方和原因,特别是与合理和必要的支持有关。虽然利益相关者认为成本、可持续性和一致性是NDIS实施中日益重要的问题,但在政策设计期间设想的最初基于权利和以人为本的目标被视为退让。在合理和必要的标准内,固有的价值紧张和争论没有得到充分认识,并且不可避免地在NDIS实施中持续存在。对未来政策改革的关键见解可以从思考实施问题和理解善意何时以及为何偏离轨道中获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policy shifts and drifts: From intention to implementation of Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme

It is not uncommon that original aspirations of social policy go astray during implementation. Issues that are the focus of social policy are often tied to various competing social, political, and value positions, making them unfailingly ‘wicked’ and rendering the design and implementation of solutions inherently challenging. Such is the case with Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), which has been plagued by implementation problems and criticised for straying from its original objectives and principles. In this article, interview data from 31 stakeholders identify perceptions of congruence of the NDIS with its original objectives and values during the decade since inception, particularly focused on decision-making of reasonable and necessary supports. The perceived shift from disability rights to fights for entitlements and changing narrative of cost containment is indicative not only of implementation challenges but the inevitability of ongoing value disputes that often plague complex social issues. At a time of major NDIS reform amid ongoing tensions and debates, goal clarity and better decision guidance remain critical for future policy design and implementation.

Points for practitioners

  • Perspectives from diverse stakeholders across Australia explore where and why the NDIS may have drifted away from its original values, especially pertaining to reasonable and necessary supports.
  • While stakeholders identified cost, sustainability, and consistency as increasingly significant issues in NDIS implementation, initial rights-based and person-centred objectives envisioned during policy design were seen as retreating.
  • The inherent value tensions and contestations within the reasonable and necessary criteria have been under-recognised and inevitably persist in NDIS implementation.
  • Critical insights for future policy reform can be gained from thinking about implementation issues and understanding when and why good intentions wander off course.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书