{"title":"从地方创新到国家政策:中国卫生监管改革中的跨境政策创业","authors":"Alex Jingwei He, Hongqiao Fu, Na Tang","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Many contemporary social problems are innately complex, increasingly requiring joint efforts across sectoral boundaries to find a resolution. Cross-boundary policy entrepreneurship, a distinctive form of policy dynamism, represents a nascent approach to policy innovation in the face of emerging disruptive technologies. By analysing a major health regulatory reform in China that was catalysed by local innovation, this study explains how a coalition of entrepreneurial actors across the local government, the corporate sector, and public hospitals was formed, and how it secured policy adoption at both local and national levels. In-depth interviews were extensively used in data collection, and a processual approach was adopted in qualitative analysis. This two-episode case study characterises four types of policy entrepreneurs and explains their respective motivations and entrepreneurial strategies used in the reform. This study's findings illustrate how local innovations are scaled-up into national policies in a multilevel governance structure through collective manoeuvres.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Many contemporary social problems require joint innovative efforts across sectoral boundaries.</li>\n \n <li>Policy entrepreneur, process broker, program champion, and technology innovator play distinctive roles in cross-boundary policy innovations.</li>\n \n <li>Issue framing, strategic planning, coalition building, venue-shopping, persuasion, and leading by example are common entrepreneurial strategies in scaling up local innovations to national policies.</li>\n \n <li>Caveats must be drawn from both legal and ethical grounds to scrutinise cross-boundary policy entrepreneurship.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"85 1","pages":"51-70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From local innovation to national policy: Cross-boundary policy entrepreneurship in China's health regulatory reform\",\"authors\":\"Alex Jingwei He, Hongqiao Fu, Na Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8500.12687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Many contemporary social problems are innately complex, increasingly requiring joint efforts across sectoral boundaries to find a resolution. Cross-boundary policy entrepreneurship, a distinctive form of policy dynamism, represents a nascent approach to policy innovation in the face of emerging disruptive technologies. By analysing a major health regulatory reform in China that was catalysed by local innovation, this study explains how a coalition of entrepreneurial actors across the local government, the corporate sector, and public hospitals was formed, and how it secured policy adoption at both local and national levels. In-depth interviews were extensively used in data collection, and a processual approach was adopted in qualitative analysis. This two-episode case study characterises four types of policy entrepreneurs and explains their respective motivations and entrepreneurial strategies used in the reform. This study's findings illustrate how local innovations are scaled-up into national policies in a multilevel governance structure through collective manoeuvres.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Many contemporary social problems require joint innovative efforts across sectoral boundaries.</li>\\n \\n <li>Policy entrepreneur, process broker, program champion, and technology innovator play distinctive roles in cross-boundary policy innovations.</li>\\n \\n <li>Issue framing, strategic planning, coalition building, venue-shopping, persuasion, and leading by example are common entrepreneurial strategies in scaling up local innovations to national policies.</li>\\n \\n <li>Caveats must be drawn from both legal and ethical grounds to scrutinise cross-boundary policy entrepreneurship.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Public Administration\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"51-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12687\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
From local innovation to national policy: Cross-boundary policy entrepreneurship in China's health regulatory reform
Many contemporary social problems are innately complex, increasingly requiring joint efforts across sectoral boundaries to find a resolution. Cross-boundary policy entrepreneurship, a distinctive form of policy dynamism, represents a nascent approach to policy innovation in the face of emerging disruptive technologies. By analysing a major health regulatory reform in China that was catalysed by local innovation, this study explains how a coalition of entrepreneurial actors across the local government, the corporate sector, and public hospitals was formed, and how it secured policy adoption at both local and national levels. In-depth interviews were extensively used in data collection, and a processual approach was adopted in qualitative analysis. This two-episode case study characterises four types of policy entrepreneurs and explains their respective motivations and entrepreneurial strategies used in the reform. This study's findings illustrate how local innovations are scaled-up into national policies in a multilevel governance structure through collective manoeuvres.
Points for practitioners
Many contemporary social problems require joint innovative efforts across sectoral boundaries.
Policy entrepreneur, process broker, program champion, and technology innovator play distinctive roles in cross-boundary policy innovations.
Issue framing, strategic planning, coalition building, venue-shopping, persuasion, and leading by example are common entrepreneurial strategies in scaling up local innovations to national policies.
Caveats must be drawn from both legal and ethical grounds to scrutinise cross-boundary policy entrepreneurship.
期刊介绍:
Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.