{"title":"谁来保护儿童?","authors":"William D. Graf, Leon G. Epstein","doi":"10.1002/cns3.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>At a recent news conference, Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Lapado announced plans “to end all vaccine mandates in Florida law.” Dr. Lapado claimed that vaccine requirements were an “immoral” infringement on personal liberty and declared, “Who am I, as a government … to tell you what you should put in your body?” In fact, this is precisely his job. As the state's leading public health advocate for wellness and disease prevention, his responsibility is to promote evidence-based health policies and to inform those Florida citizens who cannot gather, research, or interpret the vast epidemiological data about how infectious diseases arise, spread, and are controlled. In this regard, both Dr. Lapado and the Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have failed to act solely for the public good and have violated the fundamental principle that “public service is a public trust.”</p><p>Public health imperatives should not compete with personal liberties. Individual freedoms are valued in American culture, but the prevention of contagious diseases requires civic responsibilities and collective action. All adult citizens in the US have autonomy—the ethical principle that they can make decisions for themselves. The autonomy principle is easily defended if an individual lives alone and has no contact with others. However, any infected individual who shops at the supermarket during a viral epidemic can expose vulnerable fellow citizens to the risk of major illness, hospitalization, or death.</p><p>Young children do not have autonomy and must rely on their parents to make health care decisions on their behalf. Children do have an ethical right to a healthy future, independent of their parents. If parents receive misinformation about the risks and benefits of childhood vaccines and decide against the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine for their children, those children may die during a future measles epidemic or cause the death of an immunocompromised classmate at school. Before the measles vaccine became available in 1963, 3–4 million cases occurred annually in the United States, with 48,000 hospitalizations, 500 deaths, and 1000 cases of severe encephalitis [<span>1</span>]. Public health officials are responsible for protecting the right of children to a healthy future, even if some parents are vaccine-hesitant.</p><p>There is a long and tragic history of misinformation in the public sphere causing great harm to citizens. AIDS denialism in the early 1990s—the pernicious hypothesis that HIV did not cause AIDS—led to significant public health consequences [<span>2</span>]. A broad body of scientific evidence demonstrated that specific anti-retroviral therapy (ART) decreased viral replication, blocked the spread of HIV between individuals, and prevented maternal transmission during pregnancy. Despite the scientific consensus, AIDS denialists influenced public health policy against the use of ART in South Africa in 1999, resulting in the deaths of an estimated 330,000 South Africans and 35,000 preventable infant HIV infections [<span>3</span>].</p><p>During the COVID pandemic, two phase 3 randomized controlled trials each enrolled more than 30,000 participants and provided unequivocal evidence of the safety and effectiveness of mRNA vaccines in preventing infection and severe disease [<span>4</span>]. Concurrent vaccine disinformation, exacerbated by social media, led to low vaccination rates in some states and more than 230,000 preventable deaths [<span>5</span>]. As unfortunate as this is, the current leadership of the US public health systems is suppressing scientific findings and rescinding scientific integrity policies.</p><p>Healthcare providers adhere to the principle of veracity in medical ethics, which is telling the truth and providing accurate information to patients to build trust and enable their informed decision-making. Medical “truth” integrates the best available scientific evidence on safety and benefit with clinical expertise and patient values. Pediatricians in Florida and across the US will hopefully do their best to inform families about the proven safety and efficacy of childhood vaccines and protect the children who are their patients.</p><p>For most of human history, parents grieved the immense impact of neurological injury and death that can occur in infants and children from infectious diseases such as measles, polio, HIV, pneumococcus, and <i>Haemophilus influenzae</i> type b. Unfortunately, the collective memory of these once-feared and now preventable diseases may be fading from public consciousness.</p><p>HHS leadership should recognize the history of infectious disease, endorse rigorous science, and act ethically—these are public expectations. Americans deserve better and should call for change.</p><p>William D. Graf and Leon G. Epstein contributed equally to this study.</p><p>The authors received no specific funding for this work.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":72232,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Child Neurology Society","volume":"4 1","pages":"101-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cns3.70049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Will Protect the Children?\",\"authors\":\"William D. Graf, Leon G. Epstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cns3.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>At a recent news conference, Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Lapado announced plans “to end all vaccine mandates in Florida law.” Dr. Lapado claimed that vaccine requirements were an “immoral” infringement on personal liberty and declared, “Who am I, as a government … to tell you what you should put in your body?” In fact, this is precisely his job. As the state's leading public health advocate for wellness and disease prevention, his responsibility is to promote evidence-based health policies and to inform those Florida citizens who cannot gather, research, or interpret the vast epidemiological data about how infectious diseases arise, spread, and are controlled. In this regard, both Dr. Lapado and the Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have failed to act solely for the public good and have violated the fundamental principle that “public service is a public trust.”</p><p>Public health imperatives should not compete with personal liberties. Individual freedoms are valued in American culture, but the prevention of contagious diseases requires civic responsibilities and collective action. All adult citizens in the US have autonomy—the ethical principle that they can make decisions for themselves. The autonomy principle is easily defended if an individual lives alone and has no contact with others. However, any infected individual who shops at the supermarket during a viral epidemic can expose vulnerable fellow citizens to the risk of major illness, hospitalization, or death.</p><p>Young children do not have autonomy and must rely on their parents to make health care decisions on their behalf. Children do have an ethical right to a healthy future, independent of their parents. If parents receive misinformation about the risks and benefits of childhood vaccines and decide against the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine for their children, those children may die during a future measles epidemic or cause the death of an immunocompromised classmate at school. Before the measles vaccine became available in 1963, 3–4 million cases occurred annually in the United States, with 48,000 hospitalizations, 500 deaths, and 1000 cases of severe encephalitis [<span>1</span>]. Public health officials are responsible for protecting the right of children to a healthy future, even if some parents are vaccine-hesitant.</p><p>There is a long and tragic history of misinformation in the public sphere causing great harm to citizens. AIDS denialism in the early 1990s—the pernicious hypothesis that HIV did not cause AIDS—led to significant public health consequences [<span>2</span>]. A broad body of scientific evidence demonstrated that specific anti-retroviral therapy (ART) decreased viral replication, blocked the spread of HIV between individuals, and prevented maternal transmission during pregnancy. Despite the scientific consensus, AIDS denialists influenced public health policy against the use of ART in South Africa in 1999, resulting in the deaths of an estimated 330,000 South Africans and 35,000 preventable infant HIV infections [<span>3</span>].</p><p>During the COVID pandemic, two phase 3 randomized controlled trials each enrolled more than 30,000 participants and provided unequivocal evidence of the safety and effectiveness of mRNA vaccines in preventing infection and severe disease [<span>4</span>]. Concurrent vaccine disinformation, exacerbated by social media, led to low vaccination rates in some states and more than 230,000 preventable deaths [<span>5</span>]. As unfortunate as this is, the current leadership of the US public health systems is suppressing scientific findings and rescinding scientific integrity policies.</p><p>Healthcare providers adhere to the principle of veracity in medical ethics, which is telling the truth and providing accurate information to patients to build trust and enable their informed decision-making. Medical “truth” integrates the best available scientific evidence on safety and benefit with clinical expertise and patient values. Pediatricians in Florida and across the US will hopefully do their best to inform families about the proven safety and efficacy of childhood vaccines and protect the children who are their patients.</p><p>For most of human history, parents grieved the immense impact of neurological injury and death that can occur in infants and children from infectious diseases such as measles, polio, HIV, pneumococcus, and <i>Haemophilus influenzae</i> type b. Unfortunately, the collective memory of these once-feared and now preventable diseases may be fading from public consciousness.</p><p>HHS leadership should recognize the history of infectious disease, endorse rigorous science, and act ethically—these are public expectations. Americans deserve better and should call for change.</p><p>William D. Graf and Leon G. Epstein contributed equally to this study.</p><p>The authors received no specific funding for this work.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Child Neurology Society\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"101-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cns3.70049\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Child Neurology Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cns3.70049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/12/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Child Neurology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cns3.70049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在最近的新闻发布会上,佛罗里达州卫生局局长Joseph a . Lapado博士宣布了“终止佛罗里达州法律中所有疫苗授权”的计划。拉帕多博士声称,疫苗的要求是对个人自由的“不道德”侵犯,并宣称,“作为一个政府,我是谁……告诉你应该在你的身体里注射什么?”事实上,这正是他的工作。作为该州健康和疾病预防方面的主要公共卫生倡导者,他的职责是促进以证据为基础的卫生政策,并告知那些无法收集、研究或解释有关传染病如何产生、传播和控制的大量流行病学数据的佛罗里达州公民。在这方面,Lapado博士和美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)部长小罗伯特·f·肯尼迪(Robert F. Kennedy Jr.)都未能完全为公众利益行事,并且违反了“公共服务是公众信任”的基本原则。公共卫生的必要性不应与个人自由相竞争。美国文化重视个人自由,但预防传染病需要公民责任和集体行动。在美国,所有成年公民都有自主权——他们可以自己做决定的道德原则。如果一个人独自生活,不与他人接触,自治原则很容易得到捍卫。然而,在病毒流行期间,任何在超市购物的感染者都可能使脆弱的同胞面临重大疾病、住院或死亡的风险。幼儿没有自主权,必须依靠父母代表他们作出保健决定。儿童确实有独立于父母而享有健康未来的道德权利。如果父母收到关于儿童疫苗的风险和益处的错误信息,并决定不给他们的孩子接种麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹(MMR)疫苗,这些孩子可能会在未来的麻疹流行中死亡,或者导致学校里免疫功能低下的同学死亡。在1963年麻疹疫苗问世之前,美国每年发生3-4百万病例,48000人住院,500人死亡,1000例严重脑炎。公共卫生官员有责任保护儿童拥有健康未来的权利,即使一些父母对接种疫苗犹豫不决。在公共领域,错误信息对公民造成巨大伤害的历史悠久而悲惨。20世纪90年代早期的艾滋病否认论——认为艾滋病毒不会导致艾滋病的有害假设——导致了严重的公共卫生后果。大量科学证据表明,特定的抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)可减少病毒复制,阻断艾滋病毒在个体之间的传播,并防止孕妇在怀孕期间传播艾滋病毒。尽管科学上达成了共识,但1999年,否认艾滋病的人影响了南非反对使用抗逆转录病毒治疗的公共卫生政策,导致估计33万南非人死亡,35万名可预防的婴儿感染艾滋病毒。在COVID大流行期间,两项3期随机对照试验各招募了3万多名参与者,并提供了mRNA疫苗在预防感染和严重疾病方面的安全性和有效性的明确证据。同时存在的疫苗虚假信息,加上社交媒体的加剧,导致一些州的疫苗接种率较低,并导致逾23万例本可预防的死亡。不幸的是,目前美国公共卫生系统的领导层正在压制科学发现,并废除科学诚信政策。医疗服务提供者坚持医学伦理的真实性原则,即向患者说实话,提供准确的信息,以建立信任,使他们能够知情决策。医学“真相”将有关安全性和益处的最佳现有科学证据与临床专业知识和患者价值相结合。佛罗里达州和美国各地的儿科医生希望尽最大努力告知家庭儿童疫苗的安全性和有效性,并保护他们的孩子。在人类历史的大部分时间里,父母都为婴儿和儿童因麻疹、脊髓灰质炎、艾滋病毒、肺炎球菌和b型流感嗜血杆菌等传染病而可能造成的神经损伤和死亡的巨大影响感到悲伤。不幸的是,这些曾经令人恐惧但现在可以预防的疾病的集体记忆可能正在从公众意识中消失。卫生与公众服务部的领导应该认识到传染病的历史,支持严格的科学,并采取合乎道德的行动——这些都是公众的期望。美国人应该得到更好的,应该呼吁变革。威廉·d·格拉夫和利昂·g·爱泼斯坦对这项研究做出了同样的贡献。作者没有得到这项工作的特别资助。作者声明无利益冲突。
At a recent news conference, Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Lapado announced plans “to end all vaccine mandates in Florida law.” Dr. Lapado claimed that vaccine requirements were an “immoral” infringement on personal liberty and declared, “Who am I, as a government … to tell you what you should put in your body?” In fact, this is precisely his job. As the state's leading public health advocate for wellness and disease prevention, his responsibility is to promote evidence-based health policies and to inform those Florida citizens who cannot gather, research, or interpret the vast epidemiological data about how infectious diseases arise, spread, and are controlled. In this regard, both Dr. Lapado and the Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have failed to act solely for the public good and have violated the fundamental principle that “public service is a public trust.”
Public health imperatives should not compete with personal liberties. Individual freedoms are valued in American culture, but the prevention of contagious diseases requires civic responsibilities and collective action. All adult citizens in the US have autonomy—the ethical principle that they can make decisions for themselves. The autonomy principle is easily defended if an individual lives alone and has no contact with others. However, any infected individual who shops at the supermarket during a viral epidemic can expose vulnerable fellow citizens to the risk of major illness, hospitalization, or death.
Young children do not have autonomy and must rely on their parents to make health care decisions on their behalf. Children do have an ethical right to a healthy future, independent of their parents. If parents receive misinformation about the risks and benefits of childhood vaccines and decide against the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine for their children, those children may die during a future measles epidemic or cause the death of an immunocompromised classmate at school. Before the measles vaccine became available in 1963, 3–4 million cases occurred annually in the United States, with 48,000 hospitalizations, 500 deaths, and 1000 cases of severe encephalitis [1]. Public health officials are responsible for protecting the right of children to a healthy future, even if some parents are vaccine-hesitant.
There is a long and tragic history of misinformation in the public sphere causing great harm to citizens. AIDS denialism in the early 1990s—the pernicious hypothesis that HIV did not cause AIDS—led to significant public health consequences [2]. A broad body of scientific evidence demonstrated that specific anti-retroviral therapy (ART) decreased viral replication, blocked the spread of HIV between individuals, and prevented maternal transmission during pregnancy. Despite the scientific consensus, AIDS denialists influenced public health policy against the use of ART in South Africa in 1999, resulting in the deaths of an estimated 330,000 South Africans and 35,000 preventable infant HIV infections [3].
During the COVID pandemic, two phase 3 randomized controlled trials each enrolled more than 30,000 participants and provided unequivocal evidence of the safety and effectiveness of mRNA vaccines in preventing infection and severe disease [4]. Concurrent vaccine disinformation, exacerbated by social media, led to low vaccination rates in some states and more than 230,000 preventable deaths [5]. As unfortunate as this is, the current leadership of the US public health systems is suppressing scientific findings and rescinding scientific integrity policies.
Healthcare providers adhere to the principle of veracity in medical ethics, which is telling the truth and providing accurate information to patients to build trust and enable their informed decision-making. Medical “truth” integrates the best available scientific evidence on safety and benefit with clinical expertise and patient values. Pediatricians in Florida and across the US will hopefully do their best to inform families about the proven safety and efficacy of childhood vaccines and protect the children who are their patients.
For most of human history, parents grieved the immense impact of neurological injury and death that can occur in infants and children from infectious diseases such as measles, polio, HIV, pneumococcus, and Haemophilus influenzae type b. Unfortunately, the collective memory of these once-feared and now preventable diseases may be fading from public consciousness.
HHS leadership should recognize the history of infectious disease, endorse rigorous science, and act ethically—these are public expectations. Americans deserve better and should call for change.
William D. Graf and Leon G. Epstein contributed equally to this study.
The authors received no specific funding for this work.