从堡垒到开放的岛屿:在共享住宅安排中,父母家庭之间协商时间、空间和物质流动

IF 0.6 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Court Review Pub Date : 2026-02-26 Epub Date: 2026-01-13 DOI:10.1111/fcre.70042
Laura Merla, Bérengère Nobels
{"title":"从堡垒到开放的岛屿:在共享住宅安排中,父母家庭之间协商时间、空间和物质流动","authors":"Laura Merla,&nbsp;Bérengère Nobels","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines how separated parents establish boundaries between their respective households when sharing physical custody of their children. Framed through the metaphor of an archipelago, each parental home is conceptualized as an ‘island’, capturing how children navigate life across two distinct yet interconnected households. Drawing on interviews with 21 Belgian children (aged 10–16) from 17 families, we propose a typology of five parental ‘islands’: (a) ‘fortress island’; (b) ‘cocoon island’; (c) ‘reef island’; (d) ‘open island’; and (e) ‘wild island’. Each island has its own characteristics and properties in which specific and distinct practices and subcultures can develop. While tensions between islands can—and often do—exist, this does not prevent children from experiencing home as a unified whole grounded in their sense of belonging and familiarity. Our typology serves as a conceptual tool for family law and mental health professionals to help families reflect on and improve their co-parenting arrangements post-separation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"64 1","pages":"15-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From fortresses to open islands: Negotiating time, space, and material flows between parental homes in shared residential arrangements\",\"authors\":\"Laura Merla,&nbsp;Bérengère Nobels\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fcre.70042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article examines how separated parents establish boundaries between their respective households when sharing physical custody of their children. Framed through the metaphor of an archipelago, each parental home is conceptualized as an ‘island’, capturing how children navigate life across two distinct yet interconnected households. Drawing on interviews with 21 Belgian children (aged 10–16) from 17 families, we propose a typology of five parental ‘islands’: (a) ‘fortress island’; (b) ‘cocoon island’; (c) ‘reef island’; (d) ‘open island’; and (e) ‘wild island’. Each island has its own characteristics and properties in which specific and distinct practices and subcultures can develop. While tensions between islands can—and often do—exist, this does not prevent children from experiencing home as a unified whole grounded in their sense of belonging and familiarity. Our typology serves as a conceptual tool for family law and mental health professionals to help families reflect on and improve their co-parenting arrangements post-separation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Court Review\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"15-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.70042\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Court Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.70042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.70042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了分居的父母如何在各自的家庭之间建立界限,分享他们的孩子的物理监护权。通过群岛的隐喻,每个父母的家都被概念化为一个“岛屿”,捕捉孩子们如何在两个不同但相互联系的家庭中导航生活。根据对来自17个家庭的21名比利时儿童(10-16岁)的采访,我们提出了五个父母“岛屿”的类型学:(a)“堡垒岛”;(b)“茧岛”;(c)“礁岛”;(d)“开阔岛”;(e)“野岛”。每个岛屿都有自己的特点和特性,具体和独特的做法和亚文化可以在其中发展。虽然岛屿之间的紧张关系可能而且经常存在,但这并不妨碍儿童在归属感和熟悉感的基础上把家作为一个统一的整体来体验。我们的类型学为家庭法和心理健康专业人员提供了一个概念工具,帮助家庭反思和改善他们分居后的共同抚养安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From fortresses to open islands: Negotiating time, space, and material flows between parental homes in shared residential arrangements

This article examines how separated parents establish boundaries between their respective households when sharing physical custody of their children. Framed through the metaphor of an archipelago, each parental home is conceptualized as an ‘island’, capturing how children navigate life across two distinct yet interconnected households. Drawing on interviews with 21 Belgian children (aged 10–16) from 17 families, we propose a typology of five parental ‘islands’: (a) ‘fortress island’; (b) ‘cocoon island’; (c) ‘reef island’; (d) ‘open island’; and (e) ‘wild island’. Each island has its own characteristics and properties in which specific and distinct practices and subcultures can develop. While tensions between islands can—and often do—exist, this does not prevent children from experiencing home as a unified whole grounded in their sense of belonging and familiarity. Our typology serves as a conceptual tool for family law and mental health professionals to help families reflect on and improve their co-parenting arrangements post-separation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书