西班牙语电子和纸质版综合虚弱评估工具(CFAI):跨文化适应

IF 1.1 Q4 GERONTOLOGY
Agustin Lopez-Riera, Andrea Castillo-Hornero, Mario Rojano-Hidalgo, Nico de Witte, Ana Alarcón, Oscar Belmonte-Fernandez, Antonio Caballer
{"title":"西班牙语电子和纸质版综合虚弱评估工具(CFAI):跨文化适应","authors":"Agustin Lopez-Riera,&nbsp;Andrea Castillo-Hornero,&nbsp;Mario Rojano-Hidalgo,&nbsp;Nico de Witte,&nbsp;Ana Alarcón,&nbsp;Oscar Belmonte-Fernandez,&nbsp;Antonio Caballer","doi":"10.1007/s12126-026-09662-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Frailty is a dynamic and potentially reversible state that precedes and predicts adverse health outcomes. However, there is no instrument available that comprehensively assesses multidimensional frailty with adequate psychometric properties in the Spanish older population. A cross-culturally adaptation of the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI), which has shown adequate psychometric properties in the evaluation of older Belgian population, is proposed. The availability of an electronic version will enhance access to the target population and reduce the workload of healthcare professionals. The process followed the International Test Commission (ITC) guidelines for test adaptation, Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures and the recommendations of the ePRO task Force. Iterative Cognitive interviews were conducted with a sample of 10 + 10 older adults selected based on the theoretical relevance of emerging patterns. The reconciliation phase identified minor wording issues. The harmonization committee and cognitive interview reviewers proposed the most significant changes. The issues resolved included recency bias, answers not being understood as expected by experts, wording ambiguity, lack of clarity and form layout. Measurement equivalence between versions was validated. A Spanish cross-culturally adapted version of the CFAI instrument is now available in electronic and paper format. The rigorous application of international guidelines and procedures suggests a high equivalence with the original instrument and retainment of its psychometric properties. Further analysis must confirm this assumption.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51665,"journal":{"name":"Ageing International","volume":"51 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12126-026-09662-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spanish Electronic and Paper Version of the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI): a Cross-Cultural Adaptation\",\"authors\":\"Agustin Lopez-Riera,&nbsp;Andrea Castillo-Hornero,&nbsp;Mario Rojano-Hidalgo,&nbsp;Nico de Witte,&nbsp;Ana Alarcón,&nbsp;Oscar Belmonte-Fernandez,&nbsp;Antonio Caballer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12126-026-09662-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Frailty is a dynamic and potentially reversible state that precedes and predicts adverse health outcomes. However, there is no instrument available that comprehensively assesses multidimensional frailty with adequate psychometric properties in the Spanish older population. A cross-culturally adaptation of the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI), which has shown adequate psychometric properties in the evaluation of older Belgian population, is proposed. The availability of an electronic version will enhance access to the target population and reduce the workload of healthcare professionals. The process followed the International Test Commission (ITC) guidelines for test adaptation, Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures and the recommendations of the ePRO task Force. Iterative Cognitive interviews were conducted with a sample of 10 + 10 older adults selected based on the theoretical relevance of emerging patterns. The reconciliation phase identified minor wording issues. The harmonization committee and cognitive interview reviewers proposed the most significant changes. The issues resolved included recency bias, answers not being understood as expected by experts, wording ambiguity, lack of clarity and form layout. Measurement equivalence between versions was validated. A Spanish cross-culturally adapted version of the CFAI instrument is now available in electronic and paper format. The rigorous application of international guidelines and procedures suggests a high equivalence with the original instrument and retainment of its psychometric properties. Further analysis must confirm this assumption.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ageing International\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12126-026-09662-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ageing International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12126-026-09662-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12126-026-09662-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虚弱是一种动态的、可能可逆的状态,预示着不良的健康结果。然而,目前还没有一种工具可以全面评估西班牙老年人口的多维脆弱性,并具有足够的心理测量特性。综合虚弱评估工具(CFAI)的跨文化适应,它已经显示出足够的心理测量特性在比利时老年人的评估,提出。电子版本的可用性将增加对目标人群的访问,并减少医疗保健专业人员的工作量。该过程遵循国际测试委员会(ITC)测试适应指南,患者报告结果(PRO)措施的翻译和文化适应过程良好实践原则以及ePRO工作组的建议。根据新模式的理论相关性,对10 + 10名老年人进行了迭代认知访谈。调解阶段确定了一些小的措辞问题。协调委员会和认知访谈审稿人提出了最重要的变化。解决的问题包括近因偏差、专家没有像预期那样理解答案、措辞含糊、缺乏清晰度和表单布局。验证了版本间的测量等效性。CFAI仪器的西班牙跨文化改编版本现已以电子和纸质形式提供。国际准则和程序的严格应用表明,与原始仪器高度等同,并保留了其心理测量特性。进一步的分析必须证实这一假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spanish Electronic and Paper Version of the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI): a Cross-Cultural Adaptation

Frailty is a dynamic and potentially reversible state that precedes and predicts adverse health outcomes. However, there is no instrument available that comprehensively assesses multidimensional frailty with adequate psychometric properties in the Spanish older population. A cross-culturally adaptation of the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI), which has shown adequate psychometric properties in the evaluation of older Belgian population, is proposed. The availability of an electronic version will enhance access to the target population and reduce the workload of healthcare professionals. The process followed the International Test Commission (ITC) guidelines for test adaptation, Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures and the recommendations of the ePRO task Force. Iterative Cognitive interviews were conducted with a sample of 10 + 10 older adults selected based on the theoretical relevance of emerging patterns. The reconciliation phase identified minor wording issues. The harmonization committee and cognitive interview reviewers proposed the most significant changes. The issues resolved included recency bias, answers not being understood as expected by experts, wording ambiguity, lack of clarity and form layout. Measurement equivalence between versions was validated. A Spanish cross-culturally adapted version of the CFAI instrument is now available in electronic and paper format. The rigorous application of international guidelines and procedures suggests a high equivalence with the original instrument and retainment of its psychometric properties. Further analysis must confirm this assumption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ageing International
Ageing International GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: As a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that has existed for over three decades, Ageing International serves all professionals who deal with complex ageing issues. The journal is dedicated to improving the life of ageing populations worldwide through providing an intellectual forum for communicating common concerns, exchanging analyses and discoveries in scientific research, crystallizing significant issues, and offering recommendations in ageing-related service delivery and policy making. Besides encouraging the submission of high-quality research and review papers, Ageing International seeks to bring together researchers, policy analysts, and service program administrators who are committed to reducing the ''implementation gap'' between good science and effective service, between evidence-based protocol and culturally suitable programs, and between unique innovative solutions and generalizable policies. For significant issues that are common across countries, Ageing International will organize special forums for scholars and investigators from different disciplines to present their regional perspectives as well as to provide more comprehensive analysis. The editors strongly believe that such discourse has the potential to foster a wide range of coordinated efforts that will lead to improvements in the quality of life of older persons worldwide. Abstracted and Indexed in: ABI/INFORM, Academic OneFile, Academic Search, CSA/Proquest, Current Abstracts, EBSCO, Ergonomics Abstracts, Expanded Academic, Gale, Google Scholar, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, PsychINFO, PsyARTICLES, SCOPUS, Social Science Abstracts, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书