纯音和调制刺激的频率辨别:自动和计算机测试版本的评价。

The Journal of auditory research Pub Date : 1986-04-01
G Grisanti, F Cusimano, A D'Amico
{"title":"纯音和调制刺激的频率辨别:自动和计算机测试版本的评价。","authors":"G Grisanti,&nbsp;F Cusimano,&nbsp;A D'Amico","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monaural differential frequency discrimination (delta f/f) was investigated in the 32 ears of 16 normal-hearing young adults, using an automated test of pitch-memory (the AFTD of Grisanti, Boll. Ital. Audiol. Foniatr., 1978, 1, 166-169) wherein S, in analogy with Bekesy audiometry, continuously adjusts the frequency of alternating pure-tone bursts between discriminable-nondiscriminable, and using a computer-driven test of discrimination of frequency modulation (the CTFD of Biondi, E. et al, Comm. LXV Congr. Soc. Ital. ORL Modena, 1978), wherein S presses a button, within a criterion time window, to a brief episode of frequency modulation in a pure tone. F was either 0.5, 1, or 2 kc/s at 40 db HL. An estimate of delta f/f for every test by the CTFD was printed out by the apparatus, while 4 indices of delta f/f by the ATFD were abstracted by hand from various features of the Bekesy-type tracings. Estimates of delta f/f by the CTFD were close to those of the classic study of Shower and Biddulph, but those by the ATFD were rather larger than reported in previous studies of pitch-memory. Student \"t\" tests revealed that only 5 of 24 comparisons between tests (4 ATFD variables vs 1 CTFD estimate X 2 ears X 3 frequencies) reached the 95% confidence level, while Pearson r's also showed little evidence of significant relationships between the two tests. While the CTFD yields a more precise delta f/f and has other virtues as a research tool, it demands 40-200 min to explore a listener's discriminability in both ears at 5 frequencies. Thus, although the ATFD yields less precise data, and has inherent within it the possibility of the intrusion of undesired psychological factors, it is to be preferred for clinical use since it demands only 15 min of experimental time.</p>","PeriodicalId":76646,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of auditory research","volume":"26 2","pages":"135-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency discrimination for pure-tone and modulated stimuli: an evaluation of automatic and computerized test versions.\",\"authors\":\"G Grisanti,&nbsp;F Cusimano,&nbsp;A D'Amico\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Monaural differential frequency discrimination (delta f/f) was investigated in the 32 ears of 16 normal-hearing young adults, using an automated test of pitch-memory (the AFTD of Grisanti, Boll. Ital. Audiol. Foniatr., 1978, 1, 166-169) wherein S, in analogy with Bekesy audiometry, continuously adjusts the frequency of alternating pure-tone bursts between discriminable-nondiscriminable, and using a computer-driven test of discrimination of frequency modulation (the CTFD of Biondi, E. et al, Comm. LXV Congr. Soc. Ital. ORL Modena, 1978), wherein S presses a button, within a criterion time window, to a brief episode of frequency modulation in a pure tone. F was either 0.5, 1, or 2 kc/s at 40 db HL. An estimate of delta f/f for every test by the CTFD was printed out by the apparatus, while 4 indices of delta f/f by the ATFD were abstracted by hand from various features of the Bekesy-type tracings. Estimates of delta f/f by the CTFD were close to those of the classic study of Shower and Biddulph, but those by the ATFD were rather larger than reported in previous studies of pitch-memory. Student \\\"t\\\" tests revealed that only 5 of 24 comparisons between tests (4 ATFD variables vs 1 CTFD estimate X 2 ears X 3 frequencies) reached the 95% confidence level, while Pearson r's also showed little evidence of significant relationships between the two tests. While the CTFD yields a more precise delta f/f and has other virtues as a research tool, it demands 40-200 min to explore a listener's discriminability in both ears at 5 frequencies. Thus, although the ATFD yields less precise data, and has inherent within it the possibility of the intrusion of undesired psychological factors, it is to be preferred for clinical use since it demands only 15 min of experimental time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of auditory research\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"135-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of auditory research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of auditory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用自动音高记忆测试(Boll Grisanti的AFTD),对16名听力正常的年轻人的32只耳朵进行了单耳差频辨别(delta f/f)的研究。斜体字。Audiol。Foniatr。, 1978, 1,166 -169),其中S与Bekesy测听法类似,连续调整可分辨和不可分辨之间的纯音交替爆发的频率,并使用计算机驱动的频率调制判别测试(Biondi, E. et al . Comm. LXV Congr.的CTFD)。Soc。斜体字。ORL Modena, 1978),其中S按下一个按钮,在一个标准时间窗口内,以纯音调制频率的简短插曲。在40 db HL时,F分别为0.5、1或2 kc/s。仪器打印出CTFD每次测试的δ f/f估计值,而ATFD的δ f/f的4个指标是手工从贝科西型示踪的各种特征中提取出来的。CTFD估计的δ f/f与淋浴和Biddulph的经典研究接近,但ATFD估计的δ f/f比以前的音高记忆研究报告的要大得多。学生的“t”检验显示,24个测试之间的比较(4个ATFD变量vs 1个CTFD估计X 2个耳朵X 3个频率)中只有5个达到95%的置信水平,而皮尔逊r也显示两个测试之间几乎没有显著关系的证据。虽然CTFD产生更精确的δ f/f,并且作为研究工具具有其他优点,但它需要40-200分钟来探索听众在5个频率下的双耳辨别能力。因此,尽管ATFD产生的数据不太精确,并且在其内部具有不希望的心理因素入侵的可能性,但由于它只需要15分钟的实验时间,因此它是临床使用的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frequency discrimination for pure-tone and modulated stimuli: an evaluation of automatic and computerized test versions.

Monaural differential frequency discrimination (delta f/f) was investigated in the 32 ears of 16 normal-hearing young adults, using an automated test of pitch-memory (the AFTD of Grisanti, Boll. Ital. Audiol. Foniatr., 1978, 1, 166-169) wherein S, in analogy with Bekesy audiometry, continuously adjusts the frequency of alternating pure-tone bursts between discriminable-nondiscriminable, and using a computer-driven test of discrimination of frequency modulation (the CTFD of Biondi, E. et al, Comm. LXV Congr. Soc. Ital. ORL Modena, 1978), wherein S presses a button, within a criterion time window, to a brief episode of frequency modulation in a pure tone. F was either 0.5, 1, or 2 kc/s at 40 db HL. An estimate of delta f/f for every test by the CTFD was printed out by the apparatus, while 4 indices of delta f/f by the ATFD were abstracted by hand from various features of the Bekesy-type tracings. Estimates of delta f/f by the CTFD were close to those of the classic study of Shower and Biddulph, but those by the ATFD were rather larger than reported in previous studies of pitch-memory. Student "t" tests revealed that only 5 of 24 comparisons between tests (4 ATFD variables vs 1 CTFD estimate X 2 ears X 3 frequencies) reached the 95% confidence level, while Pearson r's also showed little evidence of significant relationships between the two tests. While the CTFD yields a more precise delta f/f and has other virtues as a research tool, it demands 40-200 min to explore a listener's discriminability in both ears at 5 frequencies. Thus, although the ATFD yields less precise data, and has inherent within it the possibility of the intrusion of undesired psychological factors, it is to be preferred for clinical use since it demands only 15 min of experimental time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信