{"title":"一个改进的spondee阈值程序。","authors":"F N Martin, L K Dowdy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since Martin and Sides (Asha, 1985, 27, 29-36) found that only 6% of audiologists reported actually following current ASHA guidelines for SRT testing (Asha, 1979, 21, 353-356), a comparison was made on 36 normal-hearing adults of spondee thresholds (ST) collected following strictly those guidelines (ST1) and by an experimental procedure based on the ASHA guidelines for pure-tone audiometry (Asha, 1978, 20, 297-301) (ST2). A 3-frequency pure-tone average (PTA) was also collected. Since mean HTLs differed by less than or equal to 5 db among ST1, ST2, and PTA, both ST procedures appear equally valid and interchangeable, but ST2 was considerably more efficient, requiring less time (mean savings of 139 sec/ear) and fewer word presentations (mean savings of 15 words/ear). The ST2 procedure may have clinical use with no significant compromise in validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":76646,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of auditory research","volume":"26 2","pages":"115-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A modified spondee threshold procedure.\",\"authors\":\"F N Martin, L K Dowdy\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since Martin and Sides (Asha, 1985, 27, 29-36) found that only 6% of audiologists reported actually following current ASHA guidelines for SRT testing (Asha, 1979, 21, 353-356), a comparison was made on 36 normal-hearing adults of spondee thresholds (ST) collected following strictly those guidelines (ST1) and by an experimental procedure based on the ASHA guidelines for pure-tone audiometry (Asha, 1978, 20, 297-301) (ST2). A 3-frequency pure-tone average (PTA) was also collected. Since mean HTLs differed by less than or equal to 5 db among ST1, ST2, and PTA, both ST procedures appear equally valid and interchangeable, but ST2 was considerably more efficient, requiring less time (mean savings of 139 sec/ear) and fewer word presentations (mean savings of 15 words/ear). The ST2 procedure may have clinical use with no significant compromise in validity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of auditory research\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"115-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of auditory research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of auditory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Since Martin and Sides (Asha, 1985, 27, 29-36) found that only 6% of audiologists reported actually following current ASHA guidelines for SRT testing (Asha, 1979, 21, 353-356), a comparison was made on 36 normal-hearing adults of spondee thresholds (ST) collected following strictly those guidelines (ST1) and by an experimental procedure based on the ASHA guidelines for pure-tone audiometry (Asha, 1978, 20, 297-301) (ST2). A 3-frequency pure-tone average (PTA) was also collected. Since mean HTLs differed by less than or equal to 5 db among ST1, ST2, and PTA, both ST procedures appear equally valid and interchangeable, but ST2 was considerably more efficient, requiring less time (mean savings of 139 sec/ear) and fewer word presentations (mean savings of 15 words/ear). The ST2 procedure may have clinical use with no significant compromise in validity.