人口和剥夺因素对护理人员主导的疼痛管理的影响:英国NHS服务评估。

Angus Thomas, Graham McClelland
{"title":"人口和剥夺因素对护理人员主导的疼痛管理的影响:英国NHS服务评估。","authors":"Angus Thomas, Graham McClelland","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2026.3.10.4.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pre-hospital pain is prevalent and frequently undertreated. Limited UK-based research has examined the influence of demographic and deprivation factors on paramedic-led pain management. Early effective management of acute pain has been shown to improve patient satisfaction and outcomes, and evaluating the effectiveness of such an important intervention is critical given the limited formulary that paramedics have access to, combined with the diverse communities that paramedics serve. Hence, this service evaluation aimed to evaluate the overall effectiveness of paramedic-led pain management, considering the effectiveness in relation to demographic and deprivation factors in adult patients in the pre-hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational service evaluation was conducted using anonymised adult (18+) clinical record data. This was collected from the North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust for the period of 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2024. The primary outcome was the achievement of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID: ≥2-point or 30% reduction) and adequate pain management (APM: ≥50% reduction) on the 11-point numeric pain scale (NRS-11). Outcomes were compared across sex, age and Index of Multiple Deprivation decile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 54,998 eligible cases, the MCID was achieved in 41.98% and APM in 24.76% of patients. As social deprivation increases, patients become significantly less likely to achieve the MCID or APM (MCID: ρ = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.96, p = 0.007; APM: ρ = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.97, p = 0.002). Male patients were marginally more likely to achieve APM than female (1.13%, 95% CI: 0.40, 1.86%, p = 0.002). Increasing age correlated strongly with both MCID (ρ = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.96, p <0.001) and APM (ρ = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.96, p <0.001) achievement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Paramedic-led pain management is associated with a pain reduction in most cases; however, the magnitude of this reduction varies. Increased age, lower social deprivation and the male sex were associated with greater reported analgesic effectiveness. The reasoning for this is unclear. Further research to determine causality and inform practice in pre-hospital pain management are required before definitive conclusions can be drawn.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":"10 4","pages":"62-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12969947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of demographic and deprivation factors on paramedic-led pain management: a UK NHS service evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Angus Thomas, Graham McClelland\",\"doi\":\"10.29045/14784726.2026.3.10.4.62\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pre-hospital pain is prevalent and frequently undertreated. Limited UK-based research has examined the influence of demographic and deprivation factors on paramedic-led pain management. Early effective management of acute pain has been shown to improve patient satisfaction and outcomes, and evaluating the effectiveness of such an important intervention is critical given the limited formulary that paramedics have access to, combined with the diverse communities that paramedics serve. Hence, this service evaluation aimed to evaluate the overall effectiveness of paramedic-led pain management, considering the effectiveness in relation to demographic and deprivation factors in adult patients in the pre-hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational service evaluation was conducted using anonymised adult (18+) clinical record data. This was collected from the North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust for the period of 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2024. The primary outcome was the achievement of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID: ≥2-point or 30% reduction) and adequate pain management (APM: ≥50% reduction) on the 11-point numeric pain scale (NRS-11). Outcomes were compared across sex, age and Index of Multiple Deprivation decile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 54,998 eligible cases, the MCID was achieved in 41.98% and APM in 24.76% of patients. As social deprivation increases, patients become significantly less likely to achieve the MCID or APM (MCID: ρ = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.96, p = 0.007; APM: ρ = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.97, p = 0.002). Male patients were marginally more likely to achieve APM than female (1.13%, 95% CI: 0.40, 1.86%, p = 0.002). Increasing age correlated strongly with both MCID (ρ = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.96, p <0.001) and APM (ρ = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.96, p <0.001) achievement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Paramedic-led pain management is associated with a pain reduction in most cases; however, the magnitude of this reduction varies. Increased age, lower social deprivation and the male sex were associated with greater reported analgesic effectiveness. The reasoning for this is unclear. Further research to determine causality and inform practice in pre-hospital pain management are required before definitive conclusions can be drawn.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British paramedic journal\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"62-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12969947/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British paramedic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2026.3.10.4.62\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2026.3.10.4.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:院前疼痛是普遍的和经常治疗不足。有限的英国研究调查了人口统计学和剥夺因素对护理人员主导的疼痛管理的影响。急性疼痛的早期有效管理已被证明可以提高患者满意度和结果,鉴于护理人员可获得的处方有限,结合护理人员服务的不同社区,评估这种重要干预措施的有效性至关重要。因此,本服务评估旨在评估护理人员主导的疼痛管理的整体有效性,考虑到院前环境中成人患者的人口统计学和剥夺因素的有效性。方法:采用匿名成人(18岁以上)临床记录资料进行回顾性观察性服务评价。这是在2023年7月1日至2024年6月30日期间从东北救护车服务NHS基金会信托基金收集的。主要结局是在11分数字疼痛量表(NRS-11)上达到最小临床重要差异(MCID:≥2分或减少30%)和适当的疼痛管理(APM:≥50%减少)。结果在性别、年龄和多重剥夺指数十分位数之间进行比较。结果:54,998例符合条件的患者中,41.98%的患者达到了MCID, 24.76%的患者达到了APM。随着社会剥夺的增加,患者达到MCID或APM的可能性显著降低(MCID: ρ = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.96, p = 0.007; APM: ρ = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.97, p = 0.002)。男性患者实现APM的可能性略高于女性(1.13%,95% CI: 0.40, 1.86%, p = 0.002)。年龄的增加与两种MCID密切相关(ρ = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.96, p)。结论:在大多数情况下,护理人员主导的疼痛管理与疼痛减轻有关;然而,这种减轻的程度各不相同。年龄越大,社会剥夺程度越低,男性的镇痛效果越好。其原因尚不清楚。在得出明确结论之前,需要进一步研究以确定因果关系并为院前疼痛管理的实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of demographic and deprivation factors on paramedic-led pain management: a UK NHS service evaluation.

Introduction: Pre-hospital pain is prevalent and frequently undertreated. Limited UK-based research has examined the influence of demographic and deprivation factors on paramedic-led pain management. Early effective management of acute pain has been shown to improve patient satisfaction and outcomes, and evaluating the effectiveness of such an important intervention is critical given the limited formulary that paramedics have access to, combined with the diverse communities that paramedics serve. Hence, this service evaluation aimed to evaluate the overall effectiveness of paramedic-led pain management, considering the effectiveness in relation to demographic and deprivation factors in adult patients in the pre-hospital setting.

Methods: A retrospective observational service evaluation was conducted using anonymised adult (18+) clinical record data. This was collected from the North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust for the period of 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2024. The primary outcome was the achievement of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID: ≥2-point or 30% reduction) and adequate pain management (APM: ≥50% reduction) on the 11-point numeric pain scale (NRS-11). Outcomes were compared across sex, age and Index of Multiple Deprivation decile.

Results: Of 54,998 eligible cases, the MCID was achieved in 41.98% and APM in 24.76% of patients. As social deprivation increases, patients become significantly less likely to achieve the MCID or APM (MCID: ρ = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.96, p = 0.007; APM: ρ = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.97, p = 0.002). Male patients were marginally more likely to achieve APM than female (1.13%, 95% CI: 0.40, 1.86%, p = 0.002). Increasing age correlated strongly with both MCID (ρ = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.96, p <0.001) and APM (ρ = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.96, p <0.001) achievement.

Conclusion: Paramedic-led pain management is associated with a pain reduction in most cases; however, the magnitude of this reduction varies. Increased age, lower social deprivation and the male sex were associated with greater reported analgesic effectiveness. The reasoning for this is unclear. Further research to determine causality and inform practice in pre-hospital pain management are required before definitive conclusions can be drawn.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书