放疗对新发转移性直肠癌患者生存的影响。

IF 2.1 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Coloproctology Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI:10.3393/ac.2025.00605.0086
Harvey Yu-Li Su, Yun-Hsuan Lin, Ko-Chao Lee, Yueh-Ming Lin, Chun-Chieh Huang, Eng-Yen Huang, Tai-Jan Chiu, Shih-Yu Huang, Chia-Che Wu, Chang-Ting Lin, Ming-Chun Kuo, Kai-Lung Tsai
{"title":"放疗对新发转移性直肠癌患者生存的影响。","authors":"Harvey Yu-Li Su, Yun-Hsuan Lin, Ko-Chao Lee, Yueh-Ming Lin, Chun-Chieh Huang, Eng-Yen Huang, Tai-Jan Chiu, Shih-Yu Huang, Chia-Che Wu, Chang-Ting Lin, Ming-Chun Kuo, Kai-Lung Tsai","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.00605.0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Metastatic rectal cancer (mRC) is a highly lethal and complex disease that demands a multidisciplinary treatment approach. However, the clinical effectiveness of radiotherapy (RT) for de novo mRC remains controversial and uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined medical records from Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for patients with histologically confirmed de novo mRC diagnosed between January 2015 and December 2020. All patients received standard systemic therapy and radical surgery when feasible. The primary outcome, overall survival (OS), was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 271 patients included in the analysis, 117 received RT and 154 did not. The median OS was significantly longer in the RT group compared with the non-RT group (27.8 months vs. 21.9 months; P=0.046). Multivariate analysis identified several independent predictors of OS: age ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-2.27; P=0.001), primary tumor resection (HR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.90-3.61; P<0.001), M1b or M1c disease (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.44-2.69; P<0.001), and receipt of RT (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.02-1.94; P=0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RT significantly improves OS in patients with mRC, underscoring its role in treatment strategies. These findings support its inclusion in therapeutic protocols and highlight the need for larger, multicenter trials to confirm and extend these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"42 1","pages":"94-102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12971171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival impact of radiotherapy for patients with de novo metastatic rectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Harvey Yu-Li Su, Yun-Hsuan Lin, Ko-Chao Lee, Yueh-Ming Lin, Chun-Chieh Huang, Eng-Yen Huang, Tai-Jan Chiu, Shih-Yu Huang, Chia-Che Wu, Chang-Ting Lin, Ming-Chun Kuo, Kai-Lung Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.3393/ac.2025.00605.0086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Metastatic rectal cancer (mRC) is a highly lethal and complex disease that demands a multidisciplinary treatment approach. However, the clinical effectiveness of radiotherapy (RT) for de novo mRC remains controversial and uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined medical records from Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for patients with histologically confirmed de novo mRC diagnosed between January 2015 and December 2020. All patients received standard systemic therapy and radical surgery when feasible. The primary outcome, overall survival (OS), was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 271 patients included in the analysis, 117 received RT and 154 did not. The median OS was significantly longer in the RT group compared with the non-RT group (27.8 months vs. 21.9 months; P=0.046). Multivariate analysis identified several independent predictors of OS: age ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-2.27; P=0.001), primary tumor resection (HR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.90-3.61; P<0.001), M1b or M1c disease (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.44-2.69; P<0.001), and receipt of RT (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.02-1.94; P=0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RT significantly improves OS in patients with mRC, underscoring its role in treatment strategies. These findings support its inclusion in therapeutic protocols and highlight the need for larger, multicenter trials to confirm and extend these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Coloproctology\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"94-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12971171/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00605.0086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00605.0086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:转移性直肠癌(mRC)是一种高度致命和复杂的疾病,需要多学科的治疗方法。然而,放疗(RT)治疗新发mRC的临床有效性仍然存在争议和不确定性。方法:本回顾性队列研究检查了高雄长庚纪念医院2015年1月至2020年12月诊断的组织学证实的新发mRC患者的病历。所有患者均接受标准的全身治疗和可行的根治性手术。主要终点总生存期(OS)采用Kaplan-Meier法进行评估。采用Cox回归模型进行多变量分析。结果:纳入分析的271例患者中,117例接受了RT治疗,154例未接受RT治疗。与非RT组相比,RT组的中位OS明显更长(27.8个月vs 21.9个月;P=0.046)。多因素分析确定了几个独立的OS预测因素:年龄≥65岁(风险比[HR], 1.69; 95%可信区间[CI], 1.26-2.27; P=0.001),原发肿瘤切除(HR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.90-3.61; P)。结论:RT可显著改善mRC患者的OS,强调其在治疗策略中的作用。这些发现支持将其纳入治疗方案,并强调需要更大规模的多中心试验来证实和扩展这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Survival impact of radiotherapy for patients with de novo metastatic rectal cancer.

Survival impact of radiotherapy for patients with de novo metastatic rectal cancer.

Survival impact of radiotherapy for patients with de novo metastatic rectal cancer.

Survival impact of radiotherapy for patients with de novo metastatic rectal cancer.

Purpose: Metastatic rectal cancer (mRC) is a highly lethal and complex disease that demands a multidisciplinary treatment approach. However, the clinical effectiveness of radiotherapy (RT) for de novo mRC remains controversial and uncertain.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined medical records from Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for patients with histologically confirmed de novo mRC diagnosed between January 2015 and December 2020. All patients received standard systemic therapy and radical surgery when feasible. The primary outcome, overall survival (OS), was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox regression model.

Results: Among 271 patients included in the analysis, 117 received RT and 154 did not. The median OS was significantly longer in the RT group compared with the non-RT group (27.8 months vs. 21.9 months; P=0.046). Multivariate analysis identified several independent predictors of OS: age ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-2.27; P=0.001), primary tumor resection (HR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.90-3.61; P<0.001), M1b or M1c disease (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.44-2.69; P<0.001), and receipt of RT (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.02-1.94; P=0.036).

Conclusion: RT significantly improves OS in patients with mRC, underscoring its role in treatment strategies. These findings support its inclusion in therapeutic protocols and highlight the need for larger, multicenter trials to confirm and extend these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书