Gretchen E. Ames , Jenna L. Pennella , Michael G. Heckman , Hanna J. Sledge , Scott A. Lynch , Enrique F. Elli
{"title":"混合远程医疗和亲自代谢性减肥手术途径的随机试点研究","authors":"Gretchen E. Ames , Jenna L. Pennella , Michael G. Heckman , Hanna J. Sledge , Scott A. Lynch , Enrique F. Elli","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2026.116897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We investigated the viability of offering a telemedicine pathway to patients seeking metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients were randomized to receive hybrid telemedicine (HTM, n = 21) or face-to-face (F2F, n = 22) care. Patient characteristics, program visit completion, patient satisfaction with visits, time to surgery, and insurance payor collection ratio were compared between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The HTM group had a higher proportion of initial medical visits completed than the F2F group (100.0% vs 72.7%). Groups did not significantly differ in patient satisfaction with visits, time to surgery, or insurance payor collection ratio. In the HTM group, 42.9% of patients underwent MBS, whereas 27.3% underwent MBS in the F2F group. Overall, 30.2% of patients elected to initiate obesity management medications, and 34.8% discontinued the program.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MBS programs may improve treatment access by offering an HTM pathway. Larger investigations are needed to confirm the effect of telemedicine on MBS program access.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 116897"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized pilot study of hybrid telemedicine and in-person pathways to metabolic bariatric surgery\",\"authors\":\"Gretchen E. Ames , Jenna L. Pennella , Michael G. Heckman , Hanna J. Sledge , Scott A. Lynch , Enrique F. Elli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2026.116897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We investigated the viability of offering a telemedicine pathway to patients seeking metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients were randomized to receive hybrid telemedicine (HTM, n = 21) or face-to-face (F2F, n = 22) care. Patient characteristics, program visit completion, patient satisfaction with visits, time to surgery, and insurance payor collection ratio were compared between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The HTM group had a higher proportion of initial medical visits completed than the F2F group (100.0% vs 72.7%). Groups did not significantly differ in patient satisfaction with visits, time to surgery, or insurance payor collection ratio. In the HTM group, 42.9% of patients underwent MBS, whereas 27.3% underwent MBS in the F2F group. Overall, 30.2% of patients elected to initiate obesity management medications, and 34.8% discontinued the program.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MBS programs may improve treatment access by offering an HTM pathway. Larger investigations are needed to confirm the effect of telemedicine on MBS program access.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"256 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116897\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961026000802\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961026000802","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨为寻求代谢性减肥手术(MBS)的患者提供远程医疗途径的可行性。方法将患者随机分为远程医疗(HTM, n = 21)和面对面医疗(F2F, n = 22)两组。比较两组患者特征、项目访视完成率、访视满意度、手术时间和保险支付者回收率。结果HTM组首次就诊完成率高于F2F组(100.0% vs 72.7%)。两组患者对就诊、手术时间或保险支付者收款比例的满意度无显著差异。在HTM组中,42.9%的患者接受了MBS,而在F2F组中,27.3%的患者接受了MBS。总体而言,30.2%的患者选择开始使用肥胖管理药物,34.8%的患者停止了该计划。结论mbs方案可通过提供HTM途径改善治疗可及性。需要更大规模的调查来证实远程医疗对MBS计划访问的影响。
Randomized pilot study of hybrid telemedicine and in-person pathways to metabolic bariatric surgery
Objective
We investigated the viability of offering a telemedicine pathway to patients seeking metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS).
Methods
Patients were randomized to receive hybrid telemedicine (HTM, n = 21) or face-to-face (F2F, n = 22) care. Patient characteristics, program visit completion, patient satisfaction with visits, time to surgery, and insurance payor collection ratio were compared between groups.
Results
The HTM group had a higher proportion of initial medical visits completed than the F2F group (100.0% vs 72.7%). Groups did not significantly differ in patient satisfaction with visits, time to surgery, or insurance payor collection ratio. In the HTM group, 42.9% of patients underwent MBS, whereas 27.3% underwent MBS in the F2F group. Overall, 30.2% of patients elected to initiate obesity management medications, and 34.8% discontinued the program.
Conclusion
MBS programs may improve treatment access by offering an HTM pathway. Larger investigations are needed to confirm the effect of telemedicine on MBS program access.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.