评估关键卫生服务的复原力:英格兰急性外科手术对COVID-19大流行中断的反应。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Andrew Hutchings, Orlagh Carroll, Geoff Bellingan, David Cromwell, S Ramani Moonesinghe, Susan J Moug, Neil Smart, Ravinder Vohra, Robert J Hinchliffe, Richard Grieve
{"title":"评估关键卫生服务的复原力:英格兰急性外科手术对COVID-19大流行中断的反应。","authors":"Andrew Hutchings, Orlagh Carroll, Geoff Bellingan, David Cromwell, S Ramani Moonesinghe, Susan J Moug, Neil Smart, Ravinder Vohra, Robert J Hinchliffe, Richard Grieve","doi":"10.1177/13558196261426970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveInternational health systems had the opportunity to assess the resilience of core health services to severe disruption following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper examines the resilience of a core health service to shocks from COVID-19. We compare outcomes following emergency admissions in England during the second (Winter 2020/21) and third (Winter 2021/22) major waves of COVID-19 with the first wave and historic admissions from 2016 to 2019.MethodsThis cohort study included adult emergency admissions for five common acute surgical conditions: appendicitis, symptomatic gallstone disease, intestinal obstruction, symptomatic diverticular disease, and abdominal wall hernia in 122 acute hospital Trusts in England. Participants were 647,367 admissions in the hospital episode statistics (HES) inpatient database including 34,560 in the second wave and 36,628 in the third wave. Outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days.ResultsThere were 1308 deaths in wave two (3.8% of admissions) and 1235 (3.4%) in wave three compared with 3431 (3.4%) in the historic cohort and 577 (4.7%) in wave one. Compared with pre-COVID admissions, we found weak evidence of increased mortality in the second wave. There was no evidence of increased mortality in the third wave, compared to historic cohorts the case-mix adjusted odds ratios were: appendicitis 0.96 (95% CI 0.49-1.87); gallstone disease 1.27 (95% CI 0.94-1.72); diverticular disease 1.04 (95% CI 0.79-1.36); hernia 1.06 (95% CI 0.76-1.47); and intestinal obstruction 1.02 (95% CI 0.87-1.19).ConclusionsBy the end of wave three, outcomes for emergency admissions with five common acute conditions had returned to pre-pandemic levels. Lessons learnt during the disruption of the first wave of COVID-19 helped the NHS in England adapt emergency surgical services during subsequent waves. These findings emphasise the importance of maintaining, or quickly restoring core service capacity to help patient outcomes return to pre-pandemic levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"214-223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13589110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the resilience of a key health service: The response of acute surgical provision in England to the disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Hutchings, Orlagh Carroll, Geoff Bellingan, David Cromwell, S Ramani Moonesinghe, Susan J Moug, Neil Smart, Ravinder Vohra, Robert J Hinchliffe, Richard Grieve\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13558196261426970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveInternational health systems had the opportunity to assess the resilience of core health services to severe disruption following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper examines the resilience of a core health service to shocks from COVID-19. We compare outcomes following emergency admissions in England during the second (Winter 2020/21) and third (Winter 2021/22) major waves of COVID-19 with the first wave and historic admissions from 2016 to 2019.MethodsThis cohort study included adult emergency admissions for five common acute surgical conditions: appendicitis, symptomatic gallstone disease, intestinal obstruction, symptomatic diverticular disease, and abdominal wall hernia in 122 acute hospital Trusts in England. Participants were 647,367 admissions in the hospital episode statistics (HES) inpatient database including 34,560 in the second wave and 36,628 in the third wave. Outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days.ResultsThere were 1308 deaths in wave two (3.8% of admissions) and 1235 (3.4%) in wave three compared with 3431 (3.4%) in the historic cohort and 577 (4.7%) in wave one. Compared with pre-COVID admissions, we found weak evidence of increased mortality in the second wave. There was no evidence of increased mortality in the third wave, compared to historic cohorts the case-mix adjusted odds ratios were: appendicitis 0.96 (95% CI 0.49-1.87); gallstone disease 1.27 (95% CI 0.94-1.72); diverticular disease 1.04 (95% CI 0.79-1.36); hernia 1.06 (95% CI 0.76-1.47); and intestinal obstruction 1.02 (95% CI 0.87-1.19).ConclusionsBy the end of wave three, outcomes for emergency admissions with five common acute conditions had returned to pre-pandemic levels. Lessons learnt during the disruption of the first wave of COVID-19 helped the NHS in England adapt emergency surgical services during subsequent waves. These findings emphasise the importance of maintaining, or quickly restoring core service capacity to help patient outcomes return to pre-pandemic levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"214-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13589110/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196261426970\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/3/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196261426970","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:国际卫生系统有机会评估核心卫生服务在COVID-19大流行爆发后对严重中断的恢复能力。本文考察了核心卫生服务对2019冠状病毒病冲击的复原力。我们比较了英格兰第二波(2020/21冬季)和第三波(2021/22冬季)COVID-19主要浪潮与2016年至2019年第一波和历史入院后的结果。方法本队列研究纳入了英国122家急性医院信托医院急诊就诊的5种常见急性外科疾病:阑尾炎、症状性胆结石疾病、肠梗阻、症状性憩室疾病和腹壁疝。参与者是医院事件统计(HES)住院患者数据库中的647,367名入院患者,其中第二波为34,560名,第三波为36,628名。结果是90天的全因死亡率。结果第二波1308人死亡(占入院人数的3.8%),第三波1235人死亡(3.4%),而历史队列3431人死亡(3.4%),第一波577人死亡(4.7%)。与covid前入院相比,我们发现第二波死亡率增加的微弱证据。与历史队列相比,没有证据表明第三波死亡率增加,病例组合调整优势比为:阑尾炎0.96 (95% CI 0.49-1.87);胆结石疾病1.27 (95% CI 0.94-1.72);憩室病1.04 (95% CI 0.79-1.36);疝1.06 (95% CI 0.76-1.47);肠梗阻1.02 (95% CI 0.87-1.19)。到第三波结束时,五种常见急性疾病急诊入院的结果已恢复到大流行前的水平。在第一波COVID-19中断期间吸取的经验教训帮助英格兰的NHS在随后的浪潮中调整了紧急手术服务。这些发现强调了维持或迅速恢复核心服务能力以帮助患者预后恢复到大流行前水平的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the resilience of a key health service: The response of acute surgical provision in England to the disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic.

ObjectiveInternational health systems had the opportunity to assess the resilience of core health services to severe disruption following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper examines the resilience of a core health service to shocks from COVID-19. We compare outcomes following emergency admissions in England during the second (Winter 2020/21) and third (Winter 2021/22) major waves of COVID-19 with the first wave and historic admissions from 2016 to 2019.MethodsThis cohort study included adult emergency admissions for five common acute surgical conditions: appendicitis, symptomatic gallstone disease, intestinal obstruction, symptomatic diverticular disease, and abdominal wall hernia in 122 acute hospital Trusts in England. Participants were 647,367 admissions in the hospital episode statistics (HES) inpatient database including 34,560 in the second wave and 36,628 in the third wave. Outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days.ResultsThere were 1308 deaths in wave two (3.8% of admissions) and 1235 (3.4%) in wave three compared with 3431 (3.4%) in the historic cohort and 577 (4.7%) in wave one. Compared with pre-COVID admissions, we found weak evidence of increased mortality in the second wave. There was no evidence of increased mortality in the third wave, compared to historic cohorts the case-mix adjusted odds ratios were: appendicitis 0.96 (95% CI 0.49-1.87); gallstone disease 1.27 (95% CI 0.94-1.72); diverticular disease 1.04 (95% CI 0.79-1.36); hernia 1.06 (95% CI 0.76-1.47); and intestinal obstruction 1.02 (95% CI 0.87-1.19).ConclusionsBy the end of wave three, outcomes for emergency admissions with five common acute conditions had returned to pre-pandemic levels. Lessons learnt during the disruption of the first wave of COVID-19 helped the NHS in England adapt emergency surgical services during subsequent waves. These findings emphasise the importance of maintaining, or quickly restoring core service capacity to help patient outcomes return to pre-pandemic levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书