Satralizumab和Inebilizumab在视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍中不良事件报告信号的比较分析:使用FDA不良事件报告系统的药物警戒研究。

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yuanyuan Zhao, Yanjing Zhang, Jing Yu, Chunhua Zhou, Yupei Hao, Yan Liu, Jing Wang, Shuying Li, Zengren Zhao
{"title":"Satralizumab和Inebilizumab在视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍中不良事件报告信号的比较分析:使用FDA不良事件报告系统的药物警戒研究。","authors":"Yuanyuan Zhao, Yanjing Zhang, Jing Yu, Chunhua Zhou, Yupei Hao, Yan Liu, Jing Wang, Shuying Li, Zengren Zhao","doi":"10.5582/irdr.2025.01065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing autoimmune disorder predominantly driven by anti-aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG), which mediates astrocyte injury, neuroinflammation, and demyelination. Satralizumab and Inebilizumab represent two promising therapeutic options with distinct mechanisms of action and clinical profiles. This study conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis of data from the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 2020 to June 2025 to assess and compare adverse event (AE) reporting signals associated with Satralizumab and Inebilizumab. The analysis revealed a higher number of reported adverse events for Satralizumab compared to Inebilizumab (1,114 cases <i>vs.</i> 349 cases). A higher reporting proportion of AEs was observed in female patients for both drugs, with no statistically significant difference between them (exploratory <i>p</i> = 0.760). The reported AEs for both agents were primarily categorized under System Organ Classes (SOCs) such as infections and infestations and nervous system disorders. Urinary tract infection and pneumonia were among the most frequently reported preferred terms (PTs) for Satralizumab, whereas headache and COVID-19 were prominent for Inebilizumab. Reports classified as serious were more frequent for Satralizumab than for Inebilizumab (exploratory <i>p</i> < 0.01), noting that \"seriousness\" in FAERS may encompass outcomes related to underlying disease activity. This signal detection study highlights distinct adverse event reporting profiles for these biologics and offers insights that may inform clinical monitoring and personalized treatment strategies in NMOSD. Further studies with rigorous prospective designs are recommended to validate these findings and elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":14420,"journal":{"name":"Intractable & rare diseases research","volume":"15 1","pages":"95-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12932009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of adverse event reporting signals between Satralizumab and Inebilizumab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.\",\"authors\":\"Yuanyuan Zhao, Yanjing Zhang, Jing Yu, Chunhua Zhou, Yupei Hao, Yan Liu, Jing Wang, Shuying Li, Zengren Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.5582/irdr.2025.01065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing autoimmune disorder predominantly driven by anti-aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG), which mediates astrocyte injury, neuroinflammation, and demyelination. Satralizumab and Inebilizumab represent two promising therapeutic options with distinct mechanisms of action and clinical profiles. This study conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis of data from the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 2020 to June 2025 to assess and compare adverse event (AE) reporting signals associated with Satralizumab and Inebilizumab. The analysis revealed a higher number of reported adverse events for Satralizumab compared to Inebilizumab (1,114 cases <i>vs.</i> 349 cases). A higher reporting proportion of AEs was observed in female patients for both drugs, with no statistically significant difference between them (exploratory <i>p</i> = 0.760). The reported AEs for both agents were primarily categorized under System Organ Classes (SOCs) such as infections and infestations and nervous system disorders. Urinary tract infection and pneumonia were among the most frequently reported preferred terms (PTs) for Satralizumab, whereas headache and COVID-19 were prominent for Inebilizumab. Reports classified as serious were more frequent for Satralizumab than for Inebilizumab (exploratory <i>p</i> < 0.01), noting that \\\"seriousness\\\" in FAERS may encompass outcomes related to underlying disease activity. This signal detection study highlights distinct adverse event reporting profiles for these biologics and offers insights that may inform clinical monitoring and personalized treatment strategies in NMOSD. Further studies with rigorous prospective designs are recommended to validate these findings and elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intractable & rare diseases research\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"95-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12932009/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intractable & rare diseases research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5582/irdr.2025.01065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intractable & rare diseases research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5582/irdr.2025.01065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍(NMOSD)是一种复发性自身免疫性疾病,主要由抗水通道蛋白-4免疫球蛋白G (AQP4-IgG)驱动,介导星形细胞损伤、神经炎症和脱髓鞘。Satralizumab和Inebilizumab代表了两种有前景的治疗选择,具有不同的作用机制和临床概况。本研究对2020年1月至2025年6月美国FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据进行了回顾性药物警戒分析,以评估和比较与Satralizumab和Inebilizumab相关的不良事件(AE)报告信号。分析显示,与Inebilizumab相比,Satralizumab报告的不良事件数量更高(1114例对349例)。两种药物的女性患者报告不良事件的比例较高,但两种药物间差异无统计学意义(探索性p = 0.760)。报告的两种药物的ae主要按系统器官类别(soc)分类,如感染和侵染以及神经系统疾病。尿路感染和肺炎是satalizumab最常报告的首选术语(PTs),而头痛和COVID-19是伊比利单抗最突出的首选术语。归类为严重的报告在satalizumab中比在Inebilizumab中更常见(探索性p < 0.01),注意到FAERS中的“严重”可能包括与潜在疾病活动相关的结果。这项信号检测研究突出了这些生物制剂不同的不良事件报告概况,并提供了可能为NMOSD的临床监测和个性化治疗策略提供信息的见解。建议采用严格的前瞻性设计进行进一步研究,以验证这些发现并阐明所观察到的不良事件的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of adverse event reporting signals between Satralizumab and Inebilizumab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing autoimmune disorder predominantly driven by anti-aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG), which mediates astrocyte injury, neuroinflammation, and demyelination. Satralizumab and Inebilizumab represent two promising therapeutic options with distinct mechanisms of action and clinical profiles. This study conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis of data from the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 2020 to June 2025 to assess and compare adverse event (AE) reporting signals associated with Satralizumab and Inebilizumab. The analysis revealed a higher number of reported adverse events for Satralizumab compared to Inebilizumab (1,114 cases vs. 349 cases). A higher reporting proportion of AEs was observed in female patients for both drugs, with no statistically significant difference between them (exploratory p = 0.760). The reported AEs for both agents were primarily categorized under System Organ Classes (SOCs) such as infections and infestations and nervous system disorders. Urinary tract infection and pneumonia were among the most frequently reported preferred terms (PTs) for Satralizumab, whereas headache and COVID-19 were prominent for Inebilizumab. Reports classified as serious were more frequent for Satralizumab than for Inebilizumab (exploratory p < 0.01), noting that "seriousness" in FAERS may encompass outcomes related to underlying disease activity. This signal detection study highlights distinct adverse event reporting profiles for these biologics and offers insights that may inform clinical monitoring and personalized treatment strategies in NMOSD. Further studies with rigorous prospective designs are recommended to validate these findings and elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intractable & rare diseases research
Intractable & rare diseases research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书