孕妇对安全带教育的经验和认知:评估孕妇安全带安全干预措施的影响。

IF 3.4 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-27 DOI:10.15441/ceem.25.194
Soo Yeon Sohn, Sejin Heo, Hee Yoon, Won Chul Cha, Se Uk Lee, Gun Tak Lee, Jong Eun Park, Hansol Chang, Minha Kim, Seung Jin Maeng, Taerim Kim
{"title":"孕妇对安全带教育的经验和认知:评估孕妇安全带安全干预措施的影响。","authors":"Soo Yeon Sohn, Sejin Heo, Hee Yoon, Won Chul Cha, Se Uk Lee, Gun Tak Lee, Jong Eun Park, Hansol Chang, Minha Kim, Seung Jin Maeng, Taerim Kim","doi":"10.15441/ceem.25.194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Trauma is one of the leading causes of obstetric morbidity and mortality, and incorrect seat belt use is a major determinant of adverse outcomes. This study evaluated the impact of structured education on proper seat belt use during pregnancy and examined preferences for future interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective pilot study was conducted at a single center in Korea, over an 8-week period. Pregnant women at <37 weeks of gestation who visited the outpatient obstetrics and gynecology department were enrolled. A pre-education survey assessed baseline seat belt practices. Participants then received structured education, and a post-education survey 1 month later evaluated changes in awareness and behavior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty participants were included in the final analysis. Most reported obtaining seat belt information from unverified sources, particularly online communities. Many indicated a preference for structured education delivered by obstetricians, especially early in pregnancy. After the intervention, knowledge of proper seat belt use increased from 21.7% to 85.0% (P<0.001), and correct seat belt usage rose from 16.7% to 88.3% (P<0.001). Seat belt use while driving also improved markedly, increasing from 19.5% to 78.0% (P<0.001), demonstrating the program's effectiveness in enhancing awareness and behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Education on seat belt use during pregnancy significantly improved both knowledge and correct usage among pregnant women. Routine, formal educational programs are recommended to promote maternal and fetal safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"318-325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13654670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pregnant women's experiences and perceptions of seat belt education: assessing the impact of maternity seat belt safety interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Soo Yeon Sohn, Sejin Heo, Hee Yoon, Won Chul Cha, Se Uk Lee, Gun Tak Lee, Jong Eun Park, Hansol Chang, Minha Kim, Seung Jin Maeng, Taerim Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.15441/ceem.25.194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Trauma is one of the leading causes of obstetric morbidity and mortality, and incorrect seat belt use is a major determinant of adverse outcomes. This study evaluated the impact of structured education on proper seat belt use during pregnancy and examined preferences for future interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective pilot study was conducted at a single center in Korea, over an 8-week period. Pregnant women at <37 weeks of gestation who visited the outpatient obstetrics and gynecology department were enrolled. A pre-education survey assessed baseline seat belt practices. Participants then received structured education, and a post-education survey 1 month later evaluated changes in awareness and behavior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty participants were included in the final analysis. Most reported obtaining seat belt information from unverified sources, particularly online communities. Many indicated a preference for structured education delivered by obstetricians, especially early in pregnancy. After the intervention, knowledge of proper seat belt use increased from 21.7% to 85.0% (P<0.001), and correct seat belt usage rose from 16.7% to 88.3% (P<0.001). Seat belt use while driving also improved markedly, increasing from 19.5% to 78.0% (P<0.001), demonstrating the program's effectiveness in enhancing awareness and behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Education on seat belt use during pregnancy significantly improved both knowledge and correct usage among pregnant women. Routine, formal educational programs are recommended to promote maternal and fetal safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"318-325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13654670/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.25.194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.25.194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:创伤是产科发病率和死亡率的主要原因之一,不正确使用安全带是不良后果的主要决定因素。本研究评估了结构化教育对怀孕期间正确使用安全带的影响,并探讨了未来干预措施的偏好。方法:本前瞻性先导研究在韩国…的单中心进行,为期8周。在妇产科门诊就诊的怀孕20 - 37周的孕妇被纳入研究对象。一项学前教育调查评估了安全带的使用情况。参与者随后接受了结构化的教育,一个月后接受了教育后的调查,以评估意识和行为的变化。结果:60名受试者纳入最终分析。大多数人报告说,他们是从网上社区等未经证实的来源获取安全带信息的。许多人表示更喜欢产科医生提供的结构化教育,特别是在怀孕早期。经教育后,正确使用安全带的知别率由78.3%上升至85.0% (P < 0.001),正确使用安全带的知别率由16.7%上升至88.3% (P < 0.001)。驾驶时安全带的使用从19.5%提高到78.0% (P < 0.001),表明干预在提高意识和行为方面是有效的。结论:孕期安全带使用教育可显著提高孕妇对安全带的认识和正确使用。建议开展常规的正规教育项目,以促进孕产妇和胎儿的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pregnant women's experiences and perceptions of seat belt education: assessing the impact of maternity seat belt safety interventions.

Objective: Trauma is one of the leading causes of obstetric morbidity and mortality, and incorrect seat belt use is a major determinant of adverse outcomes. This study evaluated the impact of structured education on proper seat belt use during pregnancy and examined preferences for future interventions.

Methods: This prospective pilot study was conducted at a single center in Korea, over an 8-week period. Pregnant women at <37 weeks of gestation who visited the outpatient obstetrics and gynecology department were enrolled. A pre-education survey assessed baseline seat belt practices. Participants then received structured education, and a post-education survey 1 month later evaluated changes in awareness and behavior.

Results: Sixty participants were included in the final analysis. Most reported obtaining seat belt information from unverified sources, particularly online communities. Many indicated a preference for structured education delivered by obstetricians, especially early in pregnancy. After the intervention, knowledge of proper seat belt use increased from 21.7% to 85.0% (P<0.001), and correct seat belt usage rose from 16.7% to 88.3% (P<0.001). Seat belt use while driving also improved markedly, increasing from 19.5% to 78.0% (P<0.001), demonstrating the program's effectiveness in enhancing awareness and behavior.

Conclusion: Education on seat belt use during pregnancy significantly improved both knowledge and correct usage among pregnant women. Routine, formal educational programs are recommended to promote maternal and fetal safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书