Success Kamuhanda, Rebecca Melisa Nakitandwe, Dafala Kezimbira, Clare Kahuma Allelua, Michael Kateregga, James Serubugo, Irene Wanyana
{"title":"非洲互操作性和电子卫生标准的采用、障碍和机会:范围审查。","authors":"Success Kamuhanda, Rebecca Melisa Nakitandwe, Dafala Kezimbira, Clare Kahuma Allelua, Michael Kateregga, James Serubugo, Irene Wanyana","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Interoperability, the seamless exchange and use of data across digital health systems, is essential for integrated, efficient healthcare delivery. However, evidence on its adoption in Africa remains limited and fragmented. This scoping review aimed to map existing evidence, identify key barriers and highlight emerging opportunities for strengthening interoperability across all levels on the continent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted the review in line with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) framework. Searches were carried out across PubMed/MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, African Index Medicus and Google Scholar, focusing on English-language publications from January 2010 to March 2025. Eligible sources included peer-reviewed articles, conference papers and relevant policy documents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings revealed wide disparities in the adoption of interoperability standards, with countries such as Uganda, South Africa and Kenya showing greater momentum due to national digital strategies and health information exchange initiatives. Common challenges included limited technical capacity, fragmented infrastructure and inadequate regulatory support. However, there were encouraging developments around the use of open-source platforms like OpenHIE, regional policy alignment through the African Union Digital Health Strategy and growing public-private partnerships.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Progress remains uneven, shaped by each country's digital maturity, workforce capabilities and policy landscape. Capacity-building and better alignment with global standards could bridge current gaps.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To build resilient digital health systems, African countries must strengthen governance, invest in infrastructure and develop technical expertise. Future work should assess how interoperability influences clinical care and explore regional readiness for cross-border data exchange.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12958898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adoption, barriers and opportunities of interoperability and eHealth standards in Africa: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Success Kamuhanda, Rebecca Melisa Nakitandwe, Dafala Kezimbira, Clare Kahuma Allelua, Michael Kateregga, James Serubugo, Irene Wanyana\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Interoperability, the seamless exchange and use of data across digital health systems, is essential for integrated, efficient healthcare delivery. However, evidence on its adoption in Africa remains limited and fragmented. This scoping review aimed to map existing evidence, identify key barriers and highlight emerging opportunities for strengthening interoperability across all levels on the continent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted the review in line with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) framework. Searches were carried out across PubMed/MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, African Index Medicus and Google Scholar, focusing on English-language publications from January 2010 to March 2025. Eligible sources included peer-reviewed articles, conference papers and relevant policy documents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings revealed wide disparities in the adoption of interoperability standards, with countries such as Uganda, South Africa and Kenya showing greater momentum due to national digital strategies and health information exchange initiatives. Common challenges included limited technical capacity, fragmented infrastructure and inadequate regulatory support. However, there were encouraging developments around the use of open-source platforms like OpenHIE, regional policy alignment through the African Union Digital Health Strategy and growing public-private partnerships.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Progress remains uneven, shaped by each country's digital maturity, workforce capabilities and policy landscape. Capacity-building and better alignment with global standards could bridge current gaps.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To build resilient digital health systems, African countries must strengthen governance, invest in infrastructure and develop technical expertise. Future work should assess how interoperability influences clinical care and explore regional readiness for cross-border data exchange.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Health & Care Informatics\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12958898/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Health & Care Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:互操作性,即跨数字卫生系统无缝交换和使用数据,对于综合、高效的卫生保健服务至关重要。然而,关于非洲采用这种方法的证据仍然有限和零散。这次范围审查的目的是绘制现有证据,确定主要障碍,并强调加强非洲大陆各层面互操作性的新机会。方法:我们按照乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)的方法和PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价的首选报告项目)框架进行了综述。通过PubMed/MEDLINE、IEEE explore、African Index Medicus和谷歌Scholar进行检索,重点关注2010年1月至2025年3月的英语出版物。合格的来源包括同行评审的文章、会议论文和相关政策文件。结果:16项研究符合纳入标准。调查结果显示,在采用互操作性标准方面存在很大差异,乌干达、南非和肯尼亚等国由于国家数字战略和卫生信息交换举措而表现出更大的势头。共同的挑战包括技术能力有限、基础设施分散和监管支持不足。然而,在使用OpenHIE等开源平台、通过非洲联盟数字卫生战略进行区域政策协调以及不断增长的公私伙伴关系方面,也取得了令人鼓舞的进展。讨论:各国的数字成熟度、劳动力能力和政策格局决定了进展仍然不平衡。能力建设和更好地与全球标准保持一致可以弥合目前的差距。结论:为了建立有弹性的数字卫生系统,非洲国家必须加强治理,投资于基础设施并发展技术专长。未来的工作应评估互操作性如何影响临床护理,并探索跨界数据交换的区域准备情况。
Adoption, barriers and opportunities of interoperability and eHealth standards in Africa: a scoping review.
Objectives: Interoperability, the seamless exchange and use of data across digital health systems, is essential for integrated, efficient healthcare delivery. However, evidence on its adoption in Africa remains limited and fragmented. This scoping review aimed to map existing evidence, identify key barriers and highlight emerging opportunities for strengthening interoperability across all levels on the continent.
Methods: We conducted the review in line with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) framework. Searches were carried out across PubMed/MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, African Index Medicus and Google Scholar, focusing on English-language publications from January 2010 to March 2025. Eligible sources included peer-reviewed articles, conference papers and relevant policy documents.
Results: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings revealed wide disparities in the adoption of interoperability standards, with countries such as Uganda, South Africa and Kenya showing greater momentum due to national digital strategies and health information exchange initiatives. Common challenges included limited technical capacity, fragmented infrastructure and inadequate regulatory support. However, there were encouraging developments around the use of open-source platforms like OpenHIE, regional policy alignment through the African Union Digital Health Strategy and growing public-private partnerships.
Discussion: Progress remains uneven, shaped by each country's digital maturity, workforce capabilities and policy landscape. Capacity-building and better alignment with global standards could bridge current gaps.
Conclusion: To build resilient digital health systems, African countries must strengthen governance, invest in infrastructure and develop technical expertise. Future work should assess how interoperability influences clinical care and explore regional readiness for cross-border data exchange.