Meenu Krishnasamy, Rhiya Sharma, Lydia Nashed, Khoa Luong, Courtney Port
{"title":"出院后检测结果管理的差异:一个儿科安全问题。","authors":"Meenu Krishnasamy, Rhiya Sharma, Lydia Nashed, Khoa Luong, Courtney Port","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delay or failure to follow up tests pending at discharge (TPAD) is a major safety concern and a focus in the literature, but few studies exist in the pediatric context. We aimed to explore pediatric hospital medicine physicians' practices and perceptions of the management of TPAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were provided to hospitalists and residents at a single institution using selected questions from a published national adult primary care survey and newly developed questions. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys were completed by 25 hospitalists (89%) and 25 residents (68%). Forty-four percent (n = 11) of hospitalists reported missing test results, yet only 18% (n = 2) agreed that this error led to a delay in care. Seventy-six percent (n = 19) of hospitalists reported lacking adequate assistance to manage TPAD. There is uncertainty about who is responsible for managing TPAD among 88% (n = 22) of hospitalists and 92% (n = 23) of residents. Hospitalists were more likely than residents to use cognitive reminders (72% versus 20%, <i>P</i> = 0.0005). Many hospitalists (80%, n = 20) and residents (80%, n = 20) agreed that TPAD management is a safety issue, and nearly all hospitalists (88%, n = 22) and residents (96%, n = 24) want a standardized process. Residents were more likely to desire a shared responsibility (68% versus 32%, <i>P</i> = 0.02). Only 56% (n = 14) of hospitalists had formal education in result management; 76% (n = 19) of residents desired training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric hospitalists and residents are concerned about TPAD management, and there is considerable variability in current practices. Developing a standard process is supported by nearly all.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":"11 1","pages":"e871"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12928903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in the Management of Test Results after Hospital Discharge: A Pediatric Safety Concern.\",\"authors\":\"Meenu Krishnasamy, Rhiya Sharma, Lydia Nashed, Khoa Luong, Courtney Port\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delay or failure to follow up tests pending at discharge (TPAD) is a major safety concern and a focus in the literature, but few studies exist in the pediatric context. We aimed to explore pediatric hospital medicine physicians' practices and perceptions of the management of TPAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were provided to hospitalists and residents at a single institution using selected questions from a published national adult primary care survey and newly developed questions. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys were completed by 25 hospitalists (89%) and 25 residents (68%). Forty-four percent (n = 11) of hospitalists reported missing test results, yet only 18% (n = 2) agreed that this error led to a delay in care. Seventy-six percent (n = 19) of hospitalists reported lacking adequate assistance to manage TPAD. There is uncertainty about who is responsible for managing TPAD among 88% (n = 22) of hospitalists and 92% (n = 23) of residents. Hospitalists were more likely than residents to use cognitive reminders (72% versus 20%, <i>P</i> = 0.0005). Many hospitalists (80%, n = 20) and residents (80%, n = 20) agreed that TPAD management is a safety issue, and nearly all hospitalists (88%, n = 22) and residents (96%, n = 24) want a standardized process. Residents were more likely to desire a shared responsibility (68% versus 32%, <i>P</i> = 0.02). Only 56% (n = 14) of hospitalists had formal education in result management; 76% (n = 19) of residents desired training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric hospitalists and residents are concerned about TPAD management, and there is considerable variability in current practices. Developing a standard process is supported by nearly all.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric quality & safety\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"e871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12928903/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric quality & safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Variation in the Management of Test Results after Hospital Discharge: A Pediatric Safety Concern.
Introduction: Delay or failure to follow up tests pending at discharge (TPAD) is a major safety concern and a focus in the literature, but few studies exist in the pediatric context. We aimed to explore pediatric hospital medicine physicians' practices and perceptions of the management of TPAD.
Methods: Surveys were provided to hospitalists and residents at a single institution using selected questions from a published national adult primary care survey and newly developed questions. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests.
Results: Surveys were completed by 25 hospitalists (89%) and 25 residents (68%). Forty-four percent (n = 11) of hospitalists reported missing test results, yet only 18% (n = 2) agreed that this error led to a delay in care. Seventy-six percent (n = 19) of hospitalists reported lacking adequate assistance to manage TPAD. There is uncertainty about who is responsible for managing TPAD among 88% (n = 22) of hospitalists and 92% (n = 23) of residents. Hospitalists were more likely than residents to use cognitive reminders (72% versus 20%, P = 0.0005). Many hospitalists (80%, n = 20) and residents (80%, n = 20) agreed that TPAD management is a safety issue, and nearly all hospitalists (88%, n = 22) and residents (96%, n = 24) want a standardized process. Residents were more likely to desire a shared responsibility (68% versus 32%, P = 0.02). Only 56% (n = 14) of hospitalists had formal education in result management; 76% (n = 19) of residents desired training.
Conclusions: Pediatric hospitalists and residents are concerned about TPAD management, and there is considerable variability in current practices. Developing a standard process is supported by nearly all.