使用急诊科临床护理分类系统评估急性冠状动脉综合征患者护理文件依从性:一项描述性和指向性内容分析研究

IF 0.9 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-24 DOI:10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000606
Setareh Homami, Farshad Zinvand-Moghaddam, Maryam Rassouli, Ali Valinejadi, Abbasali Ebrahimian
{"title":"使用急诊科临床护理分类系统评估急性冠状动脉综合征患者护理文件依从性:一项描述性和指向性内容分析研究","authors":"Setareh Homami, Farshad Zinvand-Moghaddam, Maryam Rassouli, Ali Valinejadi, Abbasali Ebrahimian","doi":"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nursing documentation based on the Clinical Care Classification (CCC) system has positive results and is an excellent model to follow. This study investigated the compliance of nursing care documentation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with the CCC system. In a directed content analysis study based on the CCC system, the degree of compliance with nursing care records in patients with ACS was assessed. In the first phase, the files of all patients (108 cases) with ACS admitted to the emergency ward for 18 months were included. In the study's second phase, by purposeful sampling, verbal reports of nursing care during shift handovers were analyzed. Several new meaning units emerged in the analysis of patients' records. The most widely used new meaning unit was the patient referral method, and the next item was the site of the IV line. The overall compatibility between our findings and CCC was 27.3% in the cardiac component. The compatibility in nursing diagnosis, nursing interventions, and evaluation of nursing interventions was 25%, 33.3%, and 25%, respectively. While our study revealed a low degree of compatibility of nursing diagnosis, interventions, and evaluation with the cardiac component of the CCC system, it also highlighted the potential for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":10789,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","volume":"49 2","pages":"151-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Compliance with Nursing Care Documentation for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Using the Clinical Care Classification System in the Emergency Department: A Descriptive and Directed Content Analysis Study.\",\"authors\":\"Setareh Homami, Farshad Zinvand-Moghaddam, Maryam Rassouli, Ali Valinejadi, Abbasali Ebrahimian\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nursing documentation based on the Clinical Care Classification (CCC) system has positive results and is an excellent model to follow. This study investigated the compliance of nursing care documentation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with the CCC system. In a directed content analysis study based on the CCC system, the degree of compliance with nursing care records in patients with ACS was assessed. In the first phase, the files of all patients (108 cases) with ACS admitted to the emergency ward for 18 months were included. In the study's second phase, by purposeful sampling, verbal reports of nursing care during shift handovers were analyzed. Several new meaning units emerged in the analysis of patients' records. The most widely used new meaning unit was the patient referral method, and the next item was the site of the IV line. The overall compatibility between our findings and CCC was 27.3% in the cardiac component. The compatibility in nursing diagnosis, nursing interventions, and evaluation of nursing interventions was 25%, 33.3%, and 25%, respectively. While our study revealed a low degree of compatibility of nursing diagnosis, interventions, and evaluation with the cardiac component of the CCC system, it also highlighted the potential for improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"151-162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000606\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于临床护理分类(CCC)系统的护理记录取得了积极的效果,是一个很好的学习模式。本研究旨在探讨急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者使用CCC系统护理记录的依从性。在一项基于CCC系统的定向内容分析研究中,评估ACS患者对护理记录的依从程度。在第一阶段,纳入所有在急诊科住院18个月的ACS患者(108例)的档案。在研究的第二阶段,通过有目的的抽样,分析轮班期间护理的口头报告。在对病人病历的分析中出现了几个新的意义单位。使用最广泛的新含义单位是患者转诊方法,其次是静脉滴注线的位置。我们的研究结果与CCC在心脏部分的总体相容性为27.3%。在护理诊断、护理干预和护理干预评价方面的相容性分别为25%、33.3%和25%。虽然我们的研究显示护理诊断、干预和评估与CCC系统的心脏部分的兼容性较低,但它也强调了改进的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Compliance with Nursing Care Documentation for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Using the Clinical Care Classification System in the Emergency Department: A Descriptive and Directed Content Analysis Study.

Nursing documentation based on the Clinical Care Classification (CCC) system has positive results and is an excellent model to follow. This study investigated the compliance of nursing care documentation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with the CCC system. In a directed content analysis study based on the CCC system, the degree of compliance with nursing care records in patients with ACS was assessed. In the first phase, the files of all patients (108 cases) with ACS admitted to the emergency ward for 18 months were included. In the study's second phase, by purposeful sampling, verbal reports of nursing care during shift handovers were analyzed. Several new meaning units emerged in the analysis of patients' records. The most widely used new meaning unit was the patient referral method, and the next item was the site of the IV line. The overall compatibility between our findings and CCC was 27.3% in the cardiac component. The compatibility in nursing diagnosis, nursing interventions, and evaluation of nursing interventions was 25%, 33.3%, and 25%, respectively. While our study revealed a low degree of compatibility of nursing diagnosis, interventions, and evaluation with the cardiac component of the CCC system, it also highlighted the potential for improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly (CCNQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides current practice-oriented information for the continuing education and improved clinical practice of critical care professionals, including nurses, physicians, and allied health care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书