良性妇科的机器人子宫切除术:证据和见解。

IF 0.9 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-24 DOI:10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000608
Sana Mushtaq, Muhammad Arslan Ul Hassan, Yan Li
{"title":"良性妇科的机器人子宫切除术:证据和见解。","authors":"Sana Mushtaq, Muhammad Arslan Ul Hassan, Yan Li","doi":"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hysterectomy is the regimen of choice for benign gynecologic diseases, including uterine myoma, adenomyosis, endometriosis, and genital prolapse. Surgeons choose hysterectomy methods based on clinical situations or patients' preferences. Even though minimal invasive surgery (MIS) such as robotic hysterectomy (RH) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) has been improved, the abdominal hysterectomy (AH) approach is still the most common. The advancement in robotic surgeries results in increased adoption of MIS. It allows the surgeon to perform a hysterectomy for complex cases where LH and vaginal hysterectomy are contraindicated and would otherwise require laparotomy. Since both LH and RH have low rates of complications, it is not clear what benefits RH offers over LH. So, RH's advantages over LH are being debated. Robotic gynecologic treatment may have benefits that are hard to quantify. In the literature, different factors such as quality of life, cost, uterine size, complex pathology, obesity, and surgeon's experience, are being used to know the feasibility of RH. Therefore, in this review, we evaluate the factors that can help conclude the benefits or drawbacks of RH and LH.</p>","PeriodicalId":10789,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","volume":"49 2","pages":"196-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecology: Evidence and Insights.\",\"authors\":\"Sana Mushtaq, Muhammad Arslan Ul Hassan, Yan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hysterectomy is the regimen of choice for benign gynecologic diseases, including uterine myoma, adenomyosis, endometriosis, and genital prolapse. Surgeons choose hysterectomy methods based on clinical situations or patients' preferences. Even though minimal invasive surgery (MIS) such as robotic hysterectomy (RH) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) has been improved, the abdominal hysterectomy (AH) approach is still the most common. The advancement in robotic surgeries results in increased adoption of MIS. It allows the surgeon to perform a hysterectomy for complex cases where LH and vaginal hysterectomy are contraindicated and would otherwise require laparotomy. Since both LH and RH have low rates of complications, it is not clear what benefits RH offers over LH. So, RH's advantages over LH are being debated. Robotic gynecologic treatment may have benefits that are hard to quantify. In the literature, different factors such as quality of life, cost, uterine size, complex pathology, obesity, and surgeon's experience, are being used to know the feasibility of RH. Therefore, in this review, we evaluate the factors that can help conclude the benefits or drawbacks of RH and LH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"196-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

子宫切除术是良性妇科疾病的首选方案,包括子宫肌瘤,子宫腺肌症,子宫内膜异位症和生殖器脱垂。外科医生根据临床情况或患者的喜好选择子宫切除术方法。尽管微创手术(MIS)如机器人子宫切除术(RH)和腹腔镜子宫切除术(LH)已经得到了改进,但腹部子宫切除术(AH)方法仍然是最常见的。机器人手术的进步导致MIS的采用增加。它允许外科医生执行子宫切除术的复杂情况下,黄体生成素和阴道子宫切除术是禁忌,否则需要剖腹手术。由于LH和RH的并发症发生率都很低,所以目前还不清楚RH比LH有什么好处。因此,RH相对于LH的优势正在争论中。机器人妇科治疗可能有难以量化的好处。在文献中,不同的因素,如生活质量、费用、子宫大小、复杂病理、肥胖和外科医生的经验,被用来了解RH的可行性。因此,在这篇综述中,我们评估了可以帮助总结RH和LH的利弊的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecology: Evidence and Insights.

Hysterectomy is the regimen of choice for benign gynecologic diseases, including uterine myoma, adenomyosis, endometriosis, and genital prolapse. Surgeons choose hysterectomy methods based on clinical situations or patients' preferences. Even though minimal invasive surgery (MIS) such as robotic hysterectomy (RH) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) has been improved, the abdominal hysterectomy (AH) approach is still the most common. The advancement in robotic surgeries results in increased adoption of MIS. It allows the surgeon to perform a hysterectomy for complex cases where LH and vaginal hysterectomy are contraindicated and would otherwise require laparotomy. Since both LH and RH have low rates of complications, it is not clear what benefits RH offers over LH. So, RH's advantages over LH are being debated. Robotic gynecologic treatment may have benefits that are hard to quantify. In the literature, different factors such as quality of life, cost, uterine size, complex pathology, obesity, and surgeon's experience, are being used to know the feasibility of RH. Therefore, in this review, we evaluate the factors that can help conclude the benefits or drawbacks of RH and LH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly (CCNQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides current practice-oriented information for the continuing education and improved clinical practice of critical care professionals, including nurses, physicians, and allied health care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书