智力迟钝者和非智力迟钝者的自动和努力的处理。

D M Meador, N R Ellis
{"title":"智力迟钝者和非智力迟钝者的自动和努力的处理。","authors":"D M Meador,&nbsp;N R Ellis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Automatic and effortful processing by brain-injured and cultural-familially mentally retarded and nonretarded persons were compared in a letter priming task. Both retarded groups responded considerably slower than did the nonretarded group. Inhibitory effects due to a prime stimulus and facilitative effects following brief presentations of prime stimuli were similar for all groups. Facilitative effects remained at the same level for the nonretarded group but clearly continued to increase for the retarded groups along the longest presentation intervals. The findings were interpreted as showing similar automatic processing effects in all groups. Effortful processing by retarded persons, on the other hand, was slower to develop and possibly greater than that by nonretarded persons.</p>","PeriodicalId":75475,"journal":{"name":"American journal of mental deficiency","volume":"91 6","pages":"613-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic and effortful processing by mentally retarded and nonretarded persons.\",\"authors\":\"D M Meador,&nbsp;N R Ellis\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Automatic and effortful processing by brain-injured and cultural-familially mentally retarded and nonretarded persons were compared in a letter priming task. Both retarded groups responded considerably slower than did the nonretarded group. Inhibitory effects due to a prime stimulus and facilitative effects following brief presentations of prime stimuli were similar for all groups. Facilitative effects remained at the same level for the nonretarded group but clearly continued to increase for the retarded groups along the longest presentation intervals. The findings were interpreted as showing similar automatic processing effects in all groups. Effortful processing by retarded persons, on the other hand, was slower to develop and possibly greater than that by nonretarded persons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of mental deficiency\",\"volume\":\"91 6\",\"pages\":\"613-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of mental deficiency\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of mental deficiency","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较了脑损伤、文化家族性智力迟钝者和非智力迟钝者在字母启动任务中的自动加工和努力加工。两个弱智组的反应都比非弱智组慢得多。在所有组中,启动刺激引起的抑制效应和启动刺激简短呈现后的促进效应是相似的。非智障组的促进效应保持在同一水平,但随着呈现时间的延长,智障组的促进效应明显继续增强。研究结果被解释为在所有组中显示了相似的自动加工效应。另一方面,智障者的努力加工发展较慢,而且可能比非智障者发展得更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automatic and effortful processing by mentally retarded and nonretarded persons.

Automatic and effortful processing by brain-injured and cultural-familially mentally retarded and nonretarded persons were compared in a letter priming task. Both retarded groups responded considerably slower than did the nonretarded group. Inhibitory effects due to a prime stimulus and facilitative effects following brief presentations of prime stimuli were similar for all groups. Facilitative effects remained at the same level for the nonretarded group but clearly continued to increase for the retarded groups along the longest presentation intervals. The findings were interpreted as showing similar automatic processing effects in all groups. Effortful processing by retarded persons, on the other hand, was slower to develop and possibly greater than that by nonretarded persons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信