抗坏血酸或谷胱甘肽对氯丙嗪阳离子自由基的清除作用

Masayasu Bando , Hajime Obazawa , Tetsuji Tanikawa
{"title":"抗坏血酸或谷胱甘肽对氯丙嗪阳离子自由基的清除作用","authors":"Masayasu Bando ,&nbsp;Hajime Obazawa ,&nbsp;Tetsuji Tanikawa","doi":"10.1016/S0748-5514(86)80008-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The report presented here demonstrates that scavenging of chlorpromazine cation radical (an absorption maximum = 530 nm) by ascorbic acid or glutathione can be kinetically and stoichiometrically analyzed at pH 1.5 but not at pH 3.0 and 6.0 using a conventional absorption spectrophotometer. The cation radical decays spontaneously about 10 and 200 times faster at pH 3.0 and 6.0, respectively, than at pH 1.5.</p><p>At pH 1.5, ascorbic acid scavenges the cation radical faster than glutathione does, and the following different scavenging mechanisms are postulated from the above kinetic and stoichiometric analysis. The reaction of the cation radical with ascorbic acid is second order. The ascorbic acid free radical, which decays mainly by dismutation, is generated by the bimolecular reaction. In the case of glutathione, on the other hand, about 70% of the scavenged cation radical disappears through free radical chain reactions that glutathione thiol anion and glutathione free radical probably initiate. The remaining (about 30%) disappears by conjugation with glutathione. It may be due to relative nonreactivity of ascorbic acid free radical that free radical chain reactions, found commonly in radical chemistry, do not occur in the scavenging reaction by ascorbic acid.</p><p>Based on the above results, the physiological scavenging mechanisms of the cation radical by the two reducing substances are discussed briefly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77737,"journal":{"name":"Journal of free radicals in biology & medicine","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 261-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0748-5514(86)80008-3","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scavenging of chlorpromazine cation radical by ascorbic acid or glutathione\",\"authors\":\"Masayasu Bando ,&nbsp;Hajime Obazawa ,&nbsp;Tetsuji Tanikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0748-5514(86)80008-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The report presented here demonstrates that scavenging of chlorpromazine cation radical (an absorption maximum = 530 nm) by ascorbic acid or glutathione can be kinetically and stoichiometrically analyzed at pH 1.5 but not at pH 3.0 and 6.0 using a conventional absorption spectrophotometer. The cation radical decays spontaneously about 10 and 200 times faster at pH 3.0 and 6.0, respectively, than at pH 1.5.</p><p>At pH 1.5, ascorbic acid scavenges the cation radical faster than glutathione does, and the following different scavenging mechanisms are postulated from the above kinetic and stoichiometric analysis. The reaction of the cation radical with ascorbic acid is second order. The ascorbic acid free radical, which decays mainly by dismutation, is generated by the bimolecular reaction. In the case of glutathione, on the other hand, about 70% of the scavenged cation radical disappears through free radical chain reactions that glutathione thiol anion and glutathione free radical probably initiate. The remaining (about 30%) disappears by conjugation with glutathione. It may be due to relative nonreactivity of ascorbic acid free radical that free radical chain reactions, found commonly in radical chemistry, do not occur in the scavenging reaction by ascorbic acid.</p><p>Based on the above results, the physiological scavenging mechanisms of the cation radical by the two reducing substances are discussed briefly.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of free radicals in biology & medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 261-266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0748-5514(86)80008-3\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of free radicals in biology & medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748551486800083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of free radicals in biology & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748551486800083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文的报告表明,抗坏血酸或谷胱甘肽对氯丙嗪阳离子自由基(最大吸收= 530 nm)的清除可以在pH为1.5时进行动力学和化学计量学分析,而在pH为3.0和6.0时则不能使用传统的吸收分光光度计。在pH为3.0和6.0时,阳离子自由基的自发衰变速度分别是pH为1.5时的10倍和200倍。在pH为1.5时,抗坏血酸清除阳离子自由基的速度比谷胱甘肽快,根据上述动力学和化学计量学分析,我们假设了以下不同的清除机制。阳离子自由基与抗坏血酸的反应是二级反应。抗坏血酸自由基是由双分子反应产生的,主要通过突变发生衰变。另一方面,在谷胱甘肽中,大约70%被清除的阳离子自由基通过可能由谷胱甘肽硫醇阴离子和谷胱甘肽自由基引发的自由基连锁反应消失。剩余的(约30%)通过与谷胱甘肽结合而消失。可能是由于抗坏血酸自由基的相对非反应性,自由基化学中常见的自由基链式反应在抗坏血酸的清除反应中不发生。在此基础上,简要讨论了两种还原性物质对阳离子自由基的生理清除机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scavenging of chlorpromazine cation radical by ascorbic acid or glutathione

The report presented here demonstrates that scavenging of chlorpromazine cation radical (an absorption maximum = 530 nm) by ascorbic acid or glutathione can be kinetically and stoichiometrically analyzed at pH 1.5 but not at pH 3.0 and 6.0 using a conventional absorption spectrophotometer. The cation radical decays spontaneously about 10 and 200 times faster at pH 3.0 and 6.0, respectively, than at pH 1.5.

At pH 1.5, ascorbic acid scavenges the cation radical faster than glutathione does, and the following different scavenging mechanisms are postulated from the above kinetic and stoichiometric analysis. The reaction of the cation radical with ascorbic acid is second order. The ascorbic acid free radical, which decays mainly by dismutation, is generated by the bimolecular reaction. In the case of glutathione, on the other hand, about 70% of the scavenged cation radical disappears through free radical chain reactions that glutathione thiol anion and glutathione free radical probably initiate. The remaining (about 30%) disappears by conjugation with glutathione. It may be due to relative nonreactivity of ascorbic acid free radical that free radical chain reactions, found commonly in radical chemistry, do not occur in the scavenging reaction by ascorbic acid.

Based on the above results, the physiological scavenging mechanisms of the cation radical by the two reducing substances are discussed briefly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信