体外细胞毒性与体内眼睛刺激的比较。

Molecular toxicology Pub Date : 1987-09-01
M Bracher, C Faller, J Spengler, C A Reinhardt
{"title":"体外细胞毒性与体内眼睛刺激的比较。","authors":"M Bracher,&nbsp;C Faller,&nbsp;J Spengler,&nbsp;C A Reinhardt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of 26 different cosmetic ingredients (e.g., permanent wave and hair dye compounds, emulsifiers, resins, and detergents such as quats) were assessed by four end points indicative for qualitatively and quantitatively different cytotoxicity: (1) neutral red uptake reduction after 24 h of treatment (NR-90 and NR-50); (2) cell detachment from culture dish after 4 h of treatment (CD-25); (3) growth inhibition after 48 h of treatment (GI-50); and (4) membrane permeability measured by fluorescent dye retention (fluorescence shift FS-25) and dye exclusion (viability ratio VR-25). The cytotoxicity potentials of the test agents were ranked for each in vitro test and compared with the in vivo eye irritation in guinea pigs (Draize test) after application of 5 or 2.5% (w/v) solutions of the same test batches. Strong irritants could be easily detected by most of the in vitro tests, but the neutral red uptake assay (especially NR-50) was the only one that was able to distinguish the minimally irritating test agents from strong irritants as well as from nonirritants. (I) All three extremely irritating quaternary ammonia compounds were identified as the strongest cytotoxic agents. (II) Nine out of 12 minimally irritating substances (mainly emulsifiers and resins) were ranked in the intermediate group. (III) Eight out of 11 non-or practically nonirritating chemicals (mainly permanent wave compounds) showed cytotoxic effects at very high concentrations only. The distinction of these three groups was better by means of NR-50 than by NR-90 data. At least two of the other cell tests (CD-25, GI-50, FS-25, and VR-25) had to be considered to allow an adequate interpretation of in vitro cytotoxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":77750,"journal":{"name":"Molecular toxicology","volume":"1 4","pages":"561-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of in vitro cell toxicity with in vivo eye irritation.\",\"authors\":\"M Bracher,&nbsp;C Faller,&nbsp;J Spengler,&nbsp;C A Reinhardt\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The effects of 26 different cosmetic ingredients (e.g., permanent wave and hair dye compounds, emulsifiers, resins, and detergents such as quats) were assessed by four end points indicative for qualitatively and quantitatively different cytotoxicity: (1) neutral red uptake reduction after 24 h of treatment (NR-90 and NR-50); (2) cell detachment from culture dish after 4 h of treatment (CD-25); (3) growth inhibition after 48 h of treatment (GI-50); and (4) membrane permeability measured by fluorescent dye retention (fluorescence shift FS-25) and dye exclusion (viability ratio VR-25). The cytotoxicity potentials of the test agents were ranked for each in vitro test and compared with the in vivo eye irritation in guinea pigs (Draize test) after application of 5 or 2.5% (w/v) solutions of the same test batches. Strong irritants could be easily detected by most of the in vitro tests, but the neutral red uptake assay (especially NR-50) was the only one that was able to distinguish the minimally irritating test agents from strong irritants as well as from nonirritants. (I) All three extremely irritating quaternary ammonia compounds were identified as the strongest cytotoxic agents. (II) Nine out of 12 minimally irritating substances (mainly emulsifiers and resins) were ranked in the intermediate group. (III) Eight out of 11 non-or practically nonirritating chemicals (mainly permanent wave compounds) showed cytotoxic effects at very high concentrations only. The distinction of these three groups was better by means of NR-50 than by NR-90 data. At least two of the other cell tests (CD-25, GI-50, FS-25, and VR-25) had to be considered to allow an adequate interpretation of in vitro cytotoxicity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular toxicology\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"561-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

26种不同的化妆品成分(例如,永久性波浪和染发剂化合物,乳化剂,树脂和洗涤剂,如quats)的效果通过四个终点来评估定性和定量不同的细胞毒性:(1)处理24小时后中性红摄取减少(NR-90和NR-50);(2)处理4 h后细胞脱离培养皿(CD-25);(3)处理48h后生长抑制(GI-50);(4)通过荧光染料保留(荧光位移FS-25)和染料排斥(活力比VR-25)测定膜透性。将各试验剂的细胞毒性电位进行体外排序,并与同一试验批次的5%或2.5% (w/v)溶液在豚鼠体内的眼刺激(Draize试验)进行比较。大多数体外试验都可以很容易地检测到强刺激物,但中性红摄取法(特别是NR-50)是唯一能够区分弱刺激物与强刺激物以及非刺激物的试验试剂。(1)三种极具刺激性的季氨化合物均为最强的细胞毒性物质。(II) 12种最低刺激性物质(主要是乳化剂和树脂)中有9种处于中间组。(III) 11种非刺激性或几乎无刺激性的化学物质(主要是永久波化合物)中有8种仅在非常高浓度时显示细胞毒性作用。用NR-50数据对三组的区分优于NR-90数据。必须考虑至少两种其他细胞试验(CD-25、GI-50、FS-25和VR-25)才能充分解释体外细胞毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of in vitro cell toxicity with in vivo eye irritation.

The effects of 26 different cosmetic ingredients (e.g., permanent wave and hair dye compounds, emulsifiers, resins, and detergents such as quats) were assessed by four end points indicative for qualitatively and quantitatively different cytotoxicity: (1) neutral red uptake reduction after 24 h of treatment (NR-90 and NR-50); (2) cell detachment from culture dish after 4 h of treatment (CD-25); (3) growth inhibition after 48 h of treatment (GI-50); and (4) membrane permeability measured by fluorescent dye retention (fluorescence shift FS-25) and dye exclusion (viability ratio VR-25). The cytotoxicity potentials of the test agents were ranked for each in vitro test and compared with the in vivo eye irritation in guinea pigs (Draize test) after application of 5 or 2.5% (w/v) solutions of the same test batches. Strong irritants could be easily detected by most of the in vitro tests, but the neutral red uptake assay (especially NR-50) was the only one that was able to distinguish the minimally irritating test agents from strong irritants as well as from nonirritants. (I) All three extremely irritating quaternary ammonia compounds were identified as the strongest cytotoxic agents. (II) Nine out of 12 minimally irritating substances (mainly emulsifiers and resins) were ranked in the intermediate group. (III) Eight out of 11 non-or practically nonirritating chemicals (mainly permanent wave compounds) showed cytotoxic effects at very high concentrations only. The distinction of these three groups was better by means of NR-50 than by NR-90 data. At least two of the other cell tests (CD-25, GI-50, FS-25, and VR-25) had to be considered to allow an adequate interpretation of in vitro cytotoxicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信