在普通医学人群中使用标准化认知工具及其对医院再入院的影响。

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION
Hannah Oldenburg, Tamra Trenary, William Harmsen, Jessica Edelstein
{"title":"在普通医学人群中使用标准化认知工具及其对医院再入院的影响。","authors":"Hannah Oldenburg, Tamra Trenary, William Harmsen, Jessica Edelstein","doi":"10.1080/07380577.2026.2631716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive functioning is essential for participation in daily activities such as work, self-care, and home management. Occupational therapy practitioners play a key role in supporting these abilities through occupation-based interventions guided by standardized cognitive assessment. However, the use of such tools in acute care remains poorly understood, especially among the variety of general medicine populations occupational therapy serves in acute care. This cross-sectional, retrospective study aimed to describe the delivery of acute occupational therapy services including the types and frequency of cognitive evaluation tools administered and to examine the relationship between receipt of a cognitive evaluation and 30-day hospital readmission. Conducted at a single academic medical center, the study included 3,334 adult patients hospitalized on a general medicine unit who received occupational therapy services from an initial sample of 18,334 patients. Among the inclusion sample, 84.5% underwent a standardized cognitive assessment with receipt of a cognitive evaluation approaching significance for association of 30-day hospital readmission (<i>p</i> = .0537). Findings indicate that occupational therapy practitioners in acute care settings employ a variety of standardized cognitive screening and performance-based tools across diverse general medicine conditions and medical acuity. Further research is warranted to explore proximal factors, such as social support and prior functional performance, and their impact on 30-day hospital readmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":46157,"journal":{"name":"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Standardized Cognitive Tools with General Medicine Populations and Impact on Hospital Readmission.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Oldenburg, Tamra Trenary, William Harmsen, Jessica Edelstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07380577.2026.2631716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cognitive functioning is essential for participation in daily activities such as work, self-care, and home management. Occupational therapy practitioners play a key role in supporting these abilities through occupation-based interventions guided by standardized cognitive assessment. However, the use of such tools in acute care remains poorly understood, especially among the variety of general medicine populations occupational therapy serves in acute care. This cross-sectional, retrospective study aimed to describe the delivery of acute occupational therapy services including the types and frequency of cognitive evaluation tools administered and to examine the relationship between receipt of a cognitive evaluation and 30-day hospital readmission. Conducted at a single academic medical center, the study included 3,334 adult patients hospitalized on a general medicine unit who received occupational therapy services from an initial sample of 18,334 patients. Among the inclusion sample, 84.5% underwent a standardized cognitive assessment with receipt of a cognitive evaluation approaching significance for association of 30-day hospital readmission (<i>p</i> = .0537). Findings indicate that occupational therapy practitioners in acute care settings employ a variety of standardized cognitive screening and performance-based tools across diverse general medicine conditions and medical acuity. Further research is warranted to explore proximal factors, such as social support and prior functional performance, and their impact on 30-day hospital readmission.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2026.2631716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2026.2631716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知功能对于参与日常活动,如工作、自我照顾和家庭管理至关重要。通过标准化认知评估指导的职业干预,职业治疗从业者在支持这些能力方面发挥着关键作用。然而,在急症护理中使用这些工具仍然知之甚少,特别是在各种普通医学人群中,职业治疗服务于急症护理。这项横断面、回顾性研究旨在描述急性职业治疗服务的提供情况,包括认知评估工具的类型和使用频率,并检查接受认知评估与30天再入院之间的关系。该研究在一个学术医疗中心进行,包括3334名在普通医学单位住院接受职业治疗服务的成年患者,最初样本为18334名患者。在纳入的样本中,84.5%的人接受了标准化的认知评估,认知评估与30天再入院的关联接近显著性(p = .0537)。研究结果表明,急症护理机构的职业治疗从业人员在不同的一般医学条件和医疗敏锐度中采用了各种标准化的认知筛查和基于绩效的工具。进一步的研究需要探讨近端因素,如社会支持和先前的功能表现,以及它们对30天再入院的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Standardized Cognitive Tools with General Medicine Populations and Impact on Hospital Readmission.

Cognitive functioning is essential for participation in daily activities such as work, self-care, and home management. Occupational therapy practitioners play a key role in supporting these abilities through occupation-based interventions guided by standardized cognitive assessment. However, the use of such tools in acute care remains poorly understood, especially among the variety of general medicine populations occupational therapy serves in acute care. This cross-sectional, retrospective study aimed to describe the delivery of acute occupational therapy services including the types and frequency of cognitive evaluation tools administered and to examine the relationship between receipt of a cognitive evaluation and 30-day hospital readmission. Conducted at a single academic medical center, the study included 3,334 adult patients hospitalized on a general medicine unit who received occupational therapy services from an initial sample of 18,334 patients. Among the inclusion sample, 84.5% underwent a standardized cognitive assessment with receipt of a cognitive evaluation approaching significance for association of 30-day hospital readmission (p = .0537). Findings indicate that occupational therapy practitioners in acute care settings employ a variety of standardized cognitive screening and performance-based tools across diverse general medicine conditions and medical acuity. Further research is warranted to explore proximal factors, such as social support and prior functional performance, and their impact on 30-day hospital readmission.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Occupational Therapy in Health Care is a journal of contemporary practice in occupational therapy. It provides occupational therapy practitioners with a forum to stay up-to-date on current methods and theories in the field. Focused on everyday practice, the journal addresses the concerns of new and experienced therapists, presenting innovations in client evaluations and treatments, current research findings, critical reviews of current textbooks, descriptions of novel programs and descriptions of fieldwork innovations. An essential guide to the changing trends in health care, social services, and education, Occupational Therapy in Health Care provides occupational therapy practitioners with a forum to stay up-to-date on current methods and theories in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书