{"title":"具有“不适用”响应的纵向倾斜调查数据的三部分随机效应模型。","authors":"Eugenia Buta, Patricia Simon, Ralitza Gueorguieva","doi":"10.3102/10769986251318028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In survey data some questions are asked only of a subset of applicable participants. This frequently occurs together with floor effects of the provided responses. For example, in the longitudinal Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) survey, nicotine dependence is assessed only for a sub-sample of individuals at each occasion and when assessed often has value at the lower end of the scale. To capture trends over time in an unbiased and efficient way, it is important to jointly model the probabilities of being asked the questions of interest, of giving a response at the lower end of the scale and of the mean response when above the lower end of the scale. We propose a three-part model for such data which consists of two logistic sub-models and a truncated normal model. Correlations among repeated observations on the same individual are induced by random effects. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference is performed in SAS PROC NLMIXED. The PATH data on young adults are used for illustration. A simulation study investigates bias and efficiency of the three-part model compared to simpler models. The three-part model has much lower bias and better coverage probabilities for the regression coefficients than simpler models.</p>","PeriodicalId":48001,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12912802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-part random effect models for longitudinal skewed survey data with \\\"not applicable\\\" responses.\",\"authors\":\"Eugenia Buta, Patricia Simon, Ralitza Gueorguieva\",\"doi\":\"10.3102/10769986251318028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In survey data some questions are asked only of a subset of applicable participants. This frequently occurs together with floor effects of the provided responses. For example, in the longitudinal Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) survey, nicotine dependence is assessed only for a sub-sample of individuals at each occasion and when assessed often has value at the lower end of the scale. To capture trends over time in an unbiased and efficient way, it is important to jointly model the probabilities of being asked the questions of interest, of giving a response at the lower end of the scale and of the mean response when above the lower end of the scale. We propose a three-part model for such data which consists of two logistic sub-models and a truncated normal model. Correlations among repeated observations on the same individual are induced by random effects. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference is performed in SAS PROC NLMIXED. The PATH data on young adults are used for illustration. A simulation study investigates bias and efficiency of the three-part model compared to simpler models. The three-part model has much lower bias and better coverage probabilities for the regression coefficients than simpler models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12912802/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986251318028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986251318028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Three-part random effect models for longitudinal skewed survey data with "not applicable" responses.
In survey data some questions are asked only of a subset of applicable participants. This frequently occurs together with floor effects of the provided responses. For example, in the longitudinal Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) survey, nicotine dependence is assessed only for a sub-sample of individuals at each occasion and when assessed often has value at the lower end of the scale. To capture trends over time in an unbiased and efficient way, it is important to jointly model the probabilities of being asked the questions of interest, of giving a response at the lower end of the scale and of the mean response when above the lower end of the scale. We propose a three-part model for such data which consists of two logistic sub-models and a truncated normal model. Correlations among repeated observations on the same individual are induced by random effects. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference is performed in SAS PROC NLMIXED. The PATH data on young adults are used for illustration. A simulation study investigates bias and efficiency of the three-part model compared to simpler models. The three-part model has much lower bias and better coverage probabilities for the regression coefficients than simpler models.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, sponsored jointly by the American Educational Research Association and the American Statistical Association, publishes articles that are original and provide methods that are useful to those studying problems and issues in educational or behavioral research. Typical papers introduce new methods of analysis. Critical reviews of current practice, tutorial presentations of less well known methods, and novel applications of already-known methods are also of interest. Papers discussing statistical techniques without specific educational or behavioral interest or focusing on substantive results without developing new statistical methods or models or making novel use of existing methods have lower priority. Simulation studies, either to demonstrate properties of an existing method or to compare several existing methods (without providing a new method), also have low priority. The Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics provides an outlet for papers that are original and provide methods that are useful to those studying problems and issues in educational or behavioral research. Typical papers introduce new methods of analysis, provide properties of these methods, and an example of use in education or behavioral research. Critical reviews of current practice, tutorial presentations of less well known methods, and novel applications of already-known methods are also sometimes accepted. Papers discussing statistical techniques without specific educational or behavioral interest or focusing on substantive results without developing new statistical methods or models or making novel use of existing methods have lower priority. Simulation studies, either to demonstrate properties of an existing method or to compare several existing methods (without providing a new method), also have low priority.