双圆受限四体问题双脉冲传递轨迹优化计算方法比较

IF 1.9 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Planetary and Space Science Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-09 DOI:10.1016/j.pss.2026.106245
G.A. Caritá , M.H.M. Morais , A.F.B.A. Prado , S. Aljbaae
{"title":"双圆受限四体问题双脉冲传递轨迹优化计算方法比较","authors":"G.A. Caritá ,&nbsp;M.H.M. Morais ,&nbsp;A.F.B.A. Prado ,&nbsp;S. Aljbaae","doi":"10.1016/j.pss.2026.106245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Optimization is a crucial process in astrodynamics, focused on finding the most efficient trajectories with minimum cost, especially in terms of total velocity change (<span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span>). The inherent complexity of orbital mechanics, particularly in multi-body systems and for long-duration transfers, often limits the effectiveness of traditional gradient-based methods, such as Non-Linear Programming (NLP), which are highly dependent on a high-quality initial guess. To overcome this limitation, meta-heuristic methods, which are robust and gradient-independent, are presented as a viable alternative. The present work evaluates the performance and efficiency of several single-objective meta-heuristic algorithms in the optimization of bi-impulsive transfer trajectories, starting from a Low Earth Orbit (LEO) at 200 km altitude toward retrograde co-orbital resonance using the Planar Restricted Bi-Circular Four-Body Problem (PBCR4BP). A comprehensive comparison was conducted using methods such as variants of Differential Evolution (DE), the Evolutionary Centers Algorithm (ECA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Simulated Annealing (SA), and Re-sampled Inheritance Search (RIS) and others, comparing them against a Random Search (RAS) baseline. The results demonstrated that Differential Evolution (DE) based methods, notably the DE/rand/1/bin RL and AD-DE/rand/1/bin RL variants, achieved the best overall performance, effectively minimizing both the required <span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span> and the computational time. Furthermore, the robust optimization strategy successfully identified more efficient solutions than previously reported in the literature, achieving a minimum <span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span> of 0.1478 km/s. We conclude that meta-heuristic methods, particularly the advanced variants of Differential Evolution, are powerful, reliable, and efficient tools for optimizing transfer trajectories in the complex dynamic environment of the PBCR4BP. However, the sensitivity analysis indicated that long-duration transfers can be highly sensitive to small perturbations, especially for eccentric target orbits near Earth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20054,"journal":{"name":"Planetary and Space Science","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 106245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of optimization methods for computing bi-impulsive transfer trajectories in the bi-circular restricted four-body problem\",\"authors\":\"G.A. Caritá ,&nbsp;M.H.M. Morais ,&nbsp;A.F.B.A. Prado ,&nbsp;S. Aljbaae\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pss.2026.106245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Optimization is a crucial process in astrodynamics, focused on finding the most efficient trajectories with minimum cost, especially in terms of total velocity change (<span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span>). The inherent complexity of orbital mechanics, particularly in multi-body systems and for long-duration transfers, often limits the effectiveness of traditional gradient-based methods, such as Non-Linear Programming (NLP), which are highly dependent on a high-quality initial guess. To overcome this limitation, meta-heuristic methods, which are robust and gradient-independent, are presented as a viable alternative. The present work evaluates the performance and efficiency of several single-objective meta-heuristic algorithms in the optimization of bi-impulsive transfer trajectories, starting from a Low Earth Orbit (LEO) at 200 km altitude toward retrograde co-orbital resonance using the Planar Restricted Bi-Circular Four-Body Problem (PBCR4BP). A comprehensive comparison was conducted using methods such as variants of Differential Evolution (DE), the Evolutionary Centers Algorithm (ECA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Simulated Annealing (SA), and Re-sampled Inheritance Search (RIS) and others, comparing them against a Random Search (RAS) baseline. The results demonstrated that Differential Evolution (DE) based methods, notably the DE/rand/1/bin RL and AD-DE/rand/1/bin RL variants, achieved the best overall performance, effectively minimizing both the required <span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span> and the computational time. Furthermore, the robust optimization strategy successfully identified more efficient solutions than previously reported in the literature, achieving a minimum <span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span> of 0.1478 km/s. We conclude that meta-heuristic methods, particularly the advanced variants of Differential Evolution, are powerful, reliable, and efficient tools for optimizing transfer trajectories in the complex dynamic environment of the PBCR4BP. However, the sensitivity analysis indicated that long-duration transfers can be highly sensitive to small perturbations, especially for eccentric target orbits near Earth.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planetary and Space Science\",\"volume\":\"271 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planetary and Space Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063326000127\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planetary and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063326000127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

优化是天体动力学中的一个关键过程,侧重于以最小的成本找到最有效的轨迹,特别是在总速度变化方面(ΔV)。轨道力学固有的复杂性,特别是在多体系统和长时间转移中,往往限制了传统的基于梯度的方法的有效性,例如非线性规划(NLP),这些方法高度依赖于高质量的初始猜测。为了克服这一限制,鲁棒性和梯度无关的元启发式方法被作为一种可行的替代方法提出。本文利用平面受限双圆四体问题(PBCR4BP),评估了几种单目标元启发式算法在从200 km高度的近地轨道(LEO)向逆行共轨共振的双脉冲转移轨迹优化中的性能和效率。采用差分进化(DE)、进化中心算法(ECA)、粒子群优化(PSO)、模拟退火(SA)和重采样遗传搜索(RIS)等方法进行了综合比较,并将它们与随机搜索(RAS)基线进行了比较。结果表明,基于差分进化(DE)的方法,特别是DE/rand/1/bin RL和AD-DE/rand/1/bin RL变体,获得了最佳的综合性能,有效地减少了所需的ΔV和计算时间。此外,鲁棒优化策略成功地确定了比先前文献报道的更有效的解决方案,实现了0.1478 km/s的最小ΔV。我们得出结论,元启发式方法,特别是差分进化的高级变体,是在复杂的动态环境中优化PBCR4BP转移轨迹的强大、可靠和有效的工具。然而,灵敏度分析表明,长时间转移对小扰动非常敏感,特别是对地球附近的偏心目标轨道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of optimization methods for computing bi-impulsive transfer trajectories in the bi-circular restricted four-body problem
Optimization is a crucial process in astrodynamics, focused on finding the most efficient trajectories with minimum cost, especially in terms of total velocity change (ΔV). The inherent complexity of orbital mechanics, particularly in multi-body systems and for long-duration transfers, often limits the effectiveness of traditional gradient-based methods, such as Non-Linear Programming (NLP), which are highly dependent on a high-quality initial guess. To overcome this limitation, meta-heuristic methods, which are robust and gradient-independent, are presented as a viable alternative. The present work evaluates the performance and efficiency of several single-objective meta-heuristic algorithms in the optimization of bi-impulsive transfer trajectories, starting from a Low Earth Orbit (LEO) at 200 km altitude toward retrograde co-orbital resonance using the Planar Restricted Bi-Circular Four-Body Problem (PBCR4BP). A comprehensive comparison was conducted using methods such as variants of Differential Evolution (DE), the Evolutionary Centers Algorithm (ECA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Simulated Annealing (SA), and Re-sampled Inheritance Search (RIS) and others, comparing them against a Random Search (RAS) baseline. The results demonstrated that Differential Evolution (DE) based methods, notably the DE/rand/1/bin RL and AD-DE/rand/1/bin RL variants, achieved the best overall performance, effectively minimizing both the required ΔV and the computational time. Furthermore, the robust optimization strategy successfully identified more efficient solutions than previously reported in the literature, achieving a minimum ΔV of 0.1478 km/s. We conclude that meta-heuristic methods, particularly the advanced variants of Differential Evolution, are powerful, reliable, and efficient tools for optimizing transfer trajectories in the complex dynamic environment of the PBCR4BP. However, the sensitivity analysis indicated that long-duration transfers can be highly sensitive to small perturbations, especially for eccentric target orbits near Earth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Planetary and Space Science
Planetary and Space Science 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
126
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Planetary and Space Science publishes original articles as well as short communications (letters). Ground-based and space-borne instrumentation and laboratory simulation of solar system processes are included. The following fields of planetary and solar system research are covered: • Celestial mechanics, including dynamical evolution of the solar system, gravitational captures and resonances, relativistic effects, tracking and dynamics • Cosmochemistry and origin, including all aspects of the formation and initial physical and chemical evolution of the solar system • Terrestrial planets and satellites, including the physics of the interiors, geology and morphology of the surfaces, tectonics, mineralogy and dating • Outer planets and satellites, including formation and evolution, remote sensing at all wavelengths and in situ measurements • Planetary atmospheres, including formation and evolution, circulation and meteorology, boundary layers, remote sensing and laboratory simulation • Planetary magnetospheres and ionospheres, including origin of magnetic fields, magnetospheric plasma and radiation belts, and their interaction with the sun, the solar wind and satellites • Small bodies, dust and rings, including asteroids, comets and zodiacal light and their interaction with the solar radiation and the solar wind • Exobiology, including origin of life, detection of planetary ecosystems and pre-biological phenomena in the solar system and laboratory simulations • Extrasolar systems, including the detection and/or the detectability of exoplanets and planetary systems, their formation and evolution, the physical and chemical properties of the exoplanets • History of planetary and space research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书