{"title":"地球同轨道小行星的同步自旋轨道共振:基于参数模型和实星历模型的研究","authors":"Pryscilla Pires","doi":"10.1016/j.pss.2026.106243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Earth co-orbitals include quasi-satellites (QS), small bodies in the 1:1 mean-motion resonance that remain gravitationally unbound while tracing long-term loops in a geocentric frame. Their orbital dynamics are well studied, whereas their rotational states remain less explored. In particular, the possibility of synchronous spin–orbit locking (1:1) under solar torque has not yet been tested for real Earth co-orbital objects. Here we investigate the 1:1 resonance for triaxial bodies under realistic orbital constraints. We apply our method to JPL Horizons ephemerides of four near-Earth co-orbitals: 2002 AA<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>29</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, (164207) Cardea (2004 GU<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>9</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>), (469219) Kamo‘oalewa (2016 HO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>), and (706765) (2010 TK<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>7</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) over a 30-year window. Our results show that <span><math><mi>Δ</mi></math></span> (the triaxiality parameter in the solar-torque spin model) controls the strength of the spin–orbit coupling, whereas increasing <span><math><mi>e</mi></math></span> promotes diffusion. Only 2002 AA<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>29</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> (<span><math><mrow><mi>e</mi><mo>≈</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>013</mn></mrow></math></span>) retains a compact synchronous island and non-zero capture fractions. For 2004 GU<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>9</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, 2016 HO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, and 2010 TK<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>7</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> (<span><math><mrow><mi>e</mi><mo>≳</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></math></span>), coherence is lost and capture becomes indistinguishable from zero. We also perform robustness tests with ephemeris cadence, stroboscopic sampling, and damping, confirming the physical nature of these results. Overall, we show that synchronous locking is detectable only at very low eccentricity and becomes unlikely for <span><math><mrow><mi>e</mi><mo>≳</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></math></span>, with potential implications for mission targets such as Kamo‘oalewa.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20054,"journal":{"name":"Planetary and Space Science","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 106243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synchronous spin–orbit resonances in earth co-orbital asteroids: A study using parametric and real-ephemeris models\",\"authors\":\"Pryscilla Pires\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pss.2026.106243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Earth co-orbitals include quasi-satellites (QS), small bodies in the 1:1 mean-motion resonance that remain gravitationally unbound while tracing long-term loops in a geocentric frame. Their orbital dynamics are well studied, whereas their rotational states remain less explored. In particular, the possibility of synchronous spin–orbit locking (1:1) under solar torque has not yet been tested for real Earth co-orbital objects. Here we investigate the 1:1 resonance for triaxial bodies under realistic orbital constraints. We apply our method to JPL Horizons ephemerides of four near-Earth co-orbitals: 2002 AA<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>29</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, (164207) Cardea (2004 GU<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>9</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>), (469219) Kamo‘oalewa (2016 HO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>), and (706765) (2010 TK<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>7</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) over a 30-year window. Our results show that <span><math><mi>Δ</mi></math></span> (the triaxiality parameter in the solar-torque spin model) controls the strength of the spin–orbit coupling, whereas increasing <span><math><mi>e</mi></math></span> promotes diffusion. Only 2002 AA<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>29</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> (<span><math><mrow><mi>e</mi><mo>≈</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>013</mn></mrow></math></span>) retains a compact synchronous island and non-zero capture fractions. For 2004 GU<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>9</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, 2016 HO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>, and 2010 TK<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>7</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> (<span><math><mrow><mi>e</mi><mo>≳</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></math></span>), coherence is lost and capture becomes indistinguishable from zero. We also perform robustness tests with ephemeris cadence, stroboscopic sampling, and damping, confirming the physical nature of these results. Overall, we show that synchronous locking is detectable only at very low eccentricity and becomes unlikely for <span><math><mrow><mi>e</mi><mo>≳</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></math></span>, with potential implications for mission targets such as Kamo‘oalewa.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planetary and Space Science\",\"volume\":\"271 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planetary and Space Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063326000103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planetary and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063326000103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Synchronous spin–orbit resonances in earth co-orbital asteroids: A study using parametric and real-ephemeris models
Earth co-orbitals include quasi-satellites (QS), small bodies in the 1:1 mean-motion resonance that remain gravitationally unbound while tracing long-term loops in a geocentric frame. Their orbital dynamics are well studied, whereas their rotational states remain less explored. In particular, the possibility of synchronous spin–orbit locking (1:1) under solar torque has not yet been tested for real Earth co-orbital objects. Here we investigate the 1:1 resonance for triaxial bodies under realistic orbital constraints. We apply our method to JPL Horizons ephemerides of four near-Earth co-orbitals: 2002 AA, (164207) Cardea (2004 GU), (469219) Kamo‘oalewa (2016 HO), and (706765) (2010 TK) over a 30-year window. Our results show that (the triaxiality parameter in the solar-torque spin model) controls the strength of the spin–orbit coupling, whereas increasing promotes diffusion. Only 2002 AA () retains a compact synchronous island and non-zero capture fractions. For 2004 GU, 2016 HO, and 2010 TK (), coherence is lost and capture becomes indistinguishable from zero. We also perform robustness tests with ephemeris cadence, stroboscopic sampling, and damping, confirming the physical nature of these results. Overall, we show that synchronous locking is detectable only at very low eccentricity and becomes unlikely for , with potential implications for mission targets such as Kamo‘oalewa.
期刊介绍:
Planetary and Space Science publishes original articles as well as short communications (letters). Ground-based and space-borne instrumentation and laboratory simulation of solar system processes are included. The following fields of planetary and solar system research are covered:
• Celestial mechanics, including dynamical evolution of the solar system, gravitational captures and resonances, relativistic effects, tracking and dynamics
• Cosmochemistry and origin, including all aspects of the formation and initial physical and chemical evolution of the solar system
• Terrestrial planets and satellites, including the physics of the interiors, geology and morphology of the surfaces, tectonics, mineralogy and dating
• Outer planets and satellites, including formation and evolution, remote sensing at all wavelengths and in situ measurements
• Planetary atmospheres, including formation and evolution, circulation and meteorology, boundary layers, remote sensing and laboratory simulation
• Planetary magnetospheres and ionospheres, including origin of magnetic fields, magnetospheric plasma and radiation belts, and their interaction with the sun, the solar wind and satellites
• Small bodies, dust and rings, including asteroids, comets and zodiacal light and their interaction with the solar radiation and the solar wind
• Exobiology, including origin of life, detection of planetary ecosystems and pre-biological phenomena in the solar system and laboratory simulations
• Extrasolar systems, including the detection and/or the detectability of exoplanets and planetary systems, their formation and evolution, the physical and chemical properties of the exoplanets
• History of planetary and space research