金黄色葡萄球菌菌株β -内酰胺酶产量的定量测定与微生物三叶草试验、显色头孢菌素试验和碘量试验定性试验的比较

J O Jarløv, V T Rosdahl
{"title":"金黄色葡萄球菌菌株β -内酰胺酶产量的定量测定与微生物三叶草试验、显色头孢菌素试验和碘量试验定性试验的比较","authors":"J O Jarløv,&nbsp;V T Rosdahl","doi":"10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03077.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One hundred and twelve beta-lactamase producing strains of Staphylococcus aureus with known quantitative production were investigated together with 45 non-beta-lactamase producing derivatives by three qualitative beta-lactamase tests: the microbiological clover leaf test, the iodometric tube test and a chromogenic cephalosporin disc test. For the beta-lactamase producing strains strong positive reactions in the qualitative tests were not correlated with high beta-lactamase production, large degree of extracellularity or high induction ratio in any of the tests. Low beta-lactamase production was not correlated to weak reactions. Best results in identifying beta-lactamase production were obtained using the iodometric test in which 109 of 112 beta-lactamase producing strains were positive and no false positive reactions were observed. Some strains had only weak positive reactions but they were easily read. The clover leaf test and the chromogenic cephalosporin test detected 105 and 107 of 112 strains, respectively. The chromogenic cephalosporin disc test had more weakly reacting strains, which were difficult to read, especially among strains of phage type 95. Three non-beta-lactamase producing strains of phage type 95 were positive in the clover leaf test. It is concluded that the iodometric tube test is the most useful one for qualitative determination of beta-lactamase production in S. aureus. It is recommended as control when normal susceptibility testing for penicillin has shown susceptibility or doubtful susceptibility. Furthermore, it is useful when no susceptibility testing has been carried out and a rapid result is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7045,"journal":{"name":"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology","volume":"94 6","pages":"415-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03077.x","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative determination of beta-lactamase production in Staphylococcus aureus strains compared to qualitative testing by a microbiological clover leaf test, a chromogenic cephalosporin test and a iodometric test.\",\"authors\":\"J O Jarløv,&nbsp;V T Rosdahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03077.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>One hundred and twelve beta-lactamase producing strains of Staphylococcus aureus with known quantitative production were investigated together with 45 non-beta-lactamase producing derivatives by three qualitative beta-lactamase tests: the microbiological clover leaf test, the iodometric tube test and a chromogenic cephalosporin disc test. For the beta-lactamase producing strains strong positive reactions in the qualitative tests were not correlated with high beta-lactamase production, large degree of extracellularity or high induction ratio in any of the tests. Low beta-lactamase production was not correlated to weak reactions. Best results in identifying beta-lactamase production were obtained using the iodometric test in which 109 of 112 beta-lactamase producing strains were positive and no false positive reactions were observed. Some strains had only weak positive reactions but they were easily read. The clover leaf test and the chromogenic cephalosporin test detected 105 and 107 of 112 strains, respectively. The chromogenic cephalosporin disc test had more weakly reacting strains, which were difficult to read, especially among strains of phage type 95. Three non-beta-lactamase producing strains of phage type 95 were positive in the clover leaf test. It is concluded that the iodometric tube test is the most useful one for qualitative determination of beta-lactamase production in S. aureus. It is recommended as control when normal susceptibility testing for penicillin has shown susceptibility or doubtful susceptibility. Furthermore, it is useful when no susceptibility testing has been carried out and a rapid result is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"94 6\",\"pages\":\"415-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03077.x\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03077.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03077.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

通过微生物三叶草试验、碘量管试验和显色头孢菌素盘试验,对已知产量的120株产β -内酰胺酶金黄色葡萄球菌和45株非产β -内酰胺酶衍生物进行了定性研究。对于产生β -内酰胺酶的菌株,定性试验中强烈的阳性反应与任何试验中β -内酰胺酶的高产量、大细胞外度或高诱导率无关。低β -内酰胺酶的产生与弱反应无关。用碘量法鉴定112株产β -内酰胺酶菌株中109株为阳性,无假阳性反应。有些菌株只有微弱的积极反应,但它们很容易被解读。三叶草试验和显色头孢菌素试验在112株中分别检测到105株和107株。显色头孢菌素圆盘试验反应较弱的菌株较多,较难辨认,尤其是噬菌体95型菌株。三叶草试验中3株非产β -内酰胺酶的噬菌体95型菌株呈阳性。结果表明,碘量试管法是测定金黄色葡萄球菌β -内酰胺酶产量最有效的方法。当青霉素的正常药敏试验显示有药敏或可疑药敏时,建议将其作为对照。此外,在没有进行敏感性试验而需要快速得出结果时,它是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative determination of beta-lactamase production in Staphylococcus aureus strains compared to qualitative testing by a microbiological clover leaf test, a chromogenic cephalosporin test and a iodometric test.

One hundred and twelve beta-lactamase producing strains of Staphylococcus aureus with known quantitative production were investigated together with 45 non-beta-lactamase producing derivatives by three qualitative beta-lactamase tests: the microbiological clover leaf test, the iodometric tube test and a chromogenic cephalosporin disc test. For the beta-lactamase producing strains strong positive reactions in the qualitative tests were not correlated with high beta-lactamase production, large degree of extracellularity or high induction ratio in any of the tests. Low beta-lactamase production was not correlated to weak reactions. Best results in identifying beta-lactamase production were obtained using the iodometric test in which 109 of 112 beta-lactamase producing strains were positive and no false positive reactions were observed. Some strains had only weak positive reactions but they were easily read. The clover leaf test and the chromogenic cephalosporin test detected 105 and 107 of 112 strains, respectively. The chromogenic cephalosporin disc test had more weakly reacting strains, which were difficult to read, especially among strains of phage type 95. Three non-beta-lactamase producing strains of phage type 95 were positive in the clover leaf test. It is concluded that the iodometric tube test is the most useful one for qualitative determination of beta-lactamase production in S. aureus. It is recommended as control when normal susceptibility testing for penicillin has shown susceptibility or doubtful susceptibility. Furthermore, it is useful when no susceptibility testing has been carried out and a rapid result is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信