{"title":"血管造影在胃肠道和泌尿系统出血中的价值。","authors":"F Lesak, J Andresen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The results of 68 abdominal angiographies were evaluated retrospectively with regard to localization of severe gastrointestinal and urological bleeding. Endoscopy prior to angiography was either impossible or showed poor results. Results of survey angiography were not encouraging. Selective angiography was very confident in localizing a bleeding. The possibilities of embolization or vasopressin treatment through the angiographic catheter are mentioned.</p>","PeriodicalId":77706,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic imaging in clinical medicine","volume":"55 3","pages":"126-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of angiography in gastrointestinal and urological bleeding.\",\"authors\":\"F Lesak, J Andresen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The results of 68 abdominal angiographies were evaluated retrospectively with regard to localization of severe gastrointestinal and urological bleeding. Endoscopy prior to angiography was either impossible or showed poor results. Results of survey angiography were not encouraging. Selective angiography was very confident in localizing a bleeding. The possibilities of embolization or vasopressin treatment through the angiographic catheter are mentioned.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic imaging in clinical medicine\",\"volume\":\"55 3\",\"pages\":\"126-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic imaging in clinical medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic imaging in clinical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The value of angiography in gastrointestinal and urological bleeding.
The results of 68 abdominal angiographies were evaluated retrospectively with regard to localization of severe gastrointestinal and urological bleeding. Endoscopy prior to angiography was either impossible or showed poor results. Results of survey angiography were not encouraging. Selective angiography was very confident in localizing a bleeding. The possibilities of embolization or vasopressin treatment through the angiographic catheter are mentioned.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
